Copperstone FS-CS 890902Jerry Parcl & Consulting Eng,neer 10 Oy t.
September 2, 1989
Mr. David Lushbaugh
Management Engineering and Technical
Services Division
Dewberry & Davis
8401 Arlington Boulevard
Fairfax, Virginia 22031
RE:
JP No. 88009; Flood Plain Reclamation;
Denton Creek and Cottonwood Branch; Coppell, Texas
Dear David:
On February 21, 1989 we submitted a study to the City of Coppell
entitled Flood Plain Reclamation Study on Cottonwood Branch and
Denton Creek for Flood Plain Reclamation and Construction o:
Parkway Boulevard Bridge. This study was prepared for submittal
to FEMA in support of our request for a Conditional Letter of Map
Revision for the Parks of Coppell project. The proposed project
is located in the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas, on the
west side of Denton Tap Road. Our previous submittal contained
the following:
Four HEC II hydraulic models of the 100-year flood in
Denton Creek and Cottonwood Branch as follows:
Model DCEX - Existing Conditions on Denton Creek
from Section 32150 to Section 39440.
Model COEX - Existing Conditions on Cottonwood
Branch from Denton Creek Section 32150 to
Cottonwood Branch Section 8000.
Model DCPR - Conditions on_ Denton Creek with
proposed fill in the Parks of Coppell project.
The reach analyzed in this model extended from
Denton Creek Section 32150 to Section 39440.
Model CPR4 - Conditions on Cottonwood Branch with
proposed fill in the Parks of Coppell and a
proposed Parkway Boulevard bridge over Cottonwood
Branch. The reach analyzed in this model extended
from Denton Creek Section 32150 to Cottonwood
Branch Section 8000.
B. Exhibit "A" showing Existing Conditions Prior to
Construction.
C. Exhibit "B" showing Conditions with Proposed
Reclamation and Bridge.
320 L~'estway Place, Suite 501 * Arlington, Texas 76018 * Metro (817) 467-2418 · (817) 465-0259
Mr. David Lushbaugh
JP No. 88009
September 2, 1989
Page 2 of 5
Cross sections of Denton Creek and Cottonwood Branch as
included in the hydraulic models presented in the
February, 1989 report. These were submitted separate
from the bound report.
The information presented herein provides an update of the
aforementioned February, 1989 submittal in response to a letter
received from Mr. John L. Matticks, Chief, Risk Studies Division,
Federal Insurance Administration, Dated July 3, 1989. A copy of
Mr. Matticks letter is enclosed. In his letter, Mr. Matticks
cites differences in the technical report we presented in
February, 1989, and a report submitted by Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. in January, 1989 on behalf of the City of
Coppell to revise the City's Flood Plain maps. Mr. Matticks
letter states that these differences should be resolved so that a
single HEC II model of existing conditions in Denton Creek and
Cottonwood Branch results.
In response to this request, the city's flood plain consultant,
Mr. Ron Morrison of Kimley-Horn and Associates, and I have met on
several occasions and have resolved all differences between our
respective' existing condition models in the project area. A
letter regarding this is being provided to FEMA by the City. The
City of Coppell F.I.S. containing these revised models of Denton
Creek and Cottonwood Branch will be submitted to FEMA in early
September, 1989.
Ail hydraulic models presented in our February, 1989 submittal
have been rerun and are included herein. The downstream limit of
these hydraulic models is Section 24700 on Denton Creek.
Hydraulic models of the 100-year flood with existing conditions
in Denton Creek and Cottonwood Branch are included herein in
Appendix A. Hydraulic models of proposed reclamation and the
proposed Parkway Boulevard bridge over Cottonwood Branch are
included herein in Appendix B. These hydraulic models are
identified below.
Model DCEXKH - Existing Conditions in Denton Creek from
Section 24700 to Section 39440.
Model CEX3KH - Existing Conditions in Cottonwood Branch from
Denton Creek Section 24700 to Cottonwood
Branch Section 8000 in the Villages of
Cottonwood Creek project which is upstream of
the Parks of Coppell.
Mr. David Lushbaugh
J? No. 88009
September '2, 1989
Page 3 of 5
Model DCPRKH - Proposed Conditions in Denton Creek. From
section 24700 to section 32230 on the
upstream side of Denton Tap Road this model
is similar to model DCEXKH since this reach
is outside of the project area and no
reclamation is proposed. Sections 32250,
32305 and 32725 are in the combined Denton
Creek-Cottonwood Branch flood plain area and
contain proposed reclamation on the south
side of Cottonwood Branch authorized by a
Conditional Letter of Map Revision received
from FEMA dated January 26, 1989 (Case No.
89-06-06R). Sections 33145 through 34950
include proposed reclamation on the south
side of Denton Creek in the Parks of Coppell,
if any. Sections 36970 through 39440 are
upstream of the project and are similar to
existing conditions model DCEXKH.
Model CPR4KH - Proposed Conditions in Cottonwood Branch.
From sections 24700 to section 32725 this
model is similar to model DCPRKH as described
above since this reach is in the Denton Creek
flood plain or combined Denton Creek-
Cottonwood Branch flood plain area. Sections
32816 through 33116 model the proposed
Parkway Boulevard bridge and channel
improvements. Sections 33560 through 34472
model proposed reclamation in the Parks of
Coppell. Sections 6710 and 8000 are existing
cross sections located upstream in the
Villages of Cottonwood Creek project.
In his letter of July 3, 1989, Mr. Matticks cites two specific
differences between the models we submitted to the City in
February, 1989 and the models submitted to FEMA by Kimley-Horn on
behalf of the City of Coppell in January, 1989. These
differences and the resolutions arrived at by Kimley-Horn and our
firm are described below.
Differences in the location of the upstream limits of
the common Denton Creek-Cottonwood Branch Flood Plain.
After reviewing the detailed topography available for
the Parks of Coppell project and comparing bank
elevations on the south side of Denton Creek with 100-
year flood levels, our firm and Kimley-Horn have agreed
that the upstream limits of the common flood plain are
approximately at Denton Creek section 32725. Both the
revised city models to be submitted to FEMA and revised
Mr. David Lushbaugh
JP No. 88009
September 2, 1989
Page 4 of 5
models contained herein for the Parks of Coppell
project evidence this by a change in discharge from the
combined flood plain discharge at section 32725 to the
100-year flood discharge in each creek at the next
section upstream.
Differences is the 100-year Flood Discharges used in
the City's models and the Parks of Coppell models.
Discharges used in the City of Coppell study prepared
by Kimley-Horn & Associates that will be submitted to
FEMA and our models of Denton Creek and Cottonwood
Branch prepared for the Parks of Coppell project as
revised and presented herein are now similar. Current
hydraulic models use the following 100-year flood
discharges at the sections listed in Mr. Matticks
letter.
CROSS SECTION
100-YEAR ULOOD DISCHARGE (c.f.s.)
Kimley-Horn & Jerry Parche'
Associates, Inc. Consultinq Enqineers
28870 (below
Cottonwood Branch)
21,300 21,300
32150 21,300 21,300
*32725 21,300 21,300
33145 14,900 14,900
36970 15,600 15,600
39440 15,600 15,600
39540 15,400
* This section was incorrectly identified in Mr. Matticks letter
as 32780.
The study description included with our initial submittal to the
City of Coppell in February, 1989 is included in Appendix C of
this report. Much of the information regarding the Parks of
Coppell project and the Denton.Creek and Cottonwood Branch flood
plains presented in that report is still current. Flood plain
and floodway elevations and flood discharges presented in our
February, 1989 report, however, are superceded by information
presented in this letter and in Appendices A and B contained
herein.
Mr. David Lushbaugh
JP No. 88009
September 2, 1989
Page 5 of 5
Exhibits "A" and "B" showing existing and proposed flood plain
conditions respectively in the Parks of Coppell are included in
the map pocket in the back of this report. Cross sections of
Denton Creek and Cottonwood Branch modelled for this study, as
revised herein, are presented separate with this report.
I trust that the information presented herein will permit
Dewberry & Davis to proceed with the review and issuance of a
Conditional Letter of Map Revision for this project. The City of
Coppell has informed me that they will provide a letter to FEMA
endorsing the proposed reclamation and Parkway Boulevard bridge
concurrent with this submittal to you.
If you need any other information or have any questions, please
call. Since time is now extremely important, I appreciate your
prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerel~
p/P.E.
JP:ch
Enclosures:
.July 3, 1989 Letter from Mr. John Matticks
Appendix A - Models DCEXKH and CEX3KH
Appendix B - Models DCPRKH and CPR4KH
Appendix C - Report included with February, 1989
submittal of this study
Map Pocket - Exhibit A - Existing Conditions
Exhibit B - Proposed Conditions
Separate - Creek Cross Sections - seven sheets
cc:
Mr. Jay Chester, e~--/A opment Corporation w/enc.
Mr. Russell Doyle, P.E./City of Coppell w/enc.
Mr. Ron Morris,, p.E./Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. w/enc.