Re CHANGE ORDER 1 FOR COPPELL ROAD (3)I think we need to use flowable fill. If that makes the cost go up, get me the number.
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: "Marty Murphy" <Martym@JRJPaving.com>
To: Keith Marvin <KMARVIN@ci.coppell.tx.us>
Cc: <longhorninc@hughes.net>
Cc: James Scott <Jamess@JRJPaving.com>
Sent: 8/28/2009 11:10:10 AM
Subject: RE: CHANGE ORDER 1 FOR COPPELL ROAD
I doubt if he planned on backfilling with anything other than the native
material. We can ask.
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Marvin [mailto:kmarvin@ci.coppell.tx.us]
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 11:01 AM
To: James Scott; Marty Murphy
Cc: Richard Odell; longhorninc@hughes.net
Subject: RE: CHANGE ORDER 1 FOR COPPELL ROAD
Marty,
I think we can make this work. I would be more comfortable with this if
we backfill to the top of this box with flowable fill. Would that be an
additional cost, or had you planned it that way already?
Keith
Keith Marvin, P.E.
Project Engineer
(972) 304-3681
>>> "Marty Murphy" <Martym@JRJPaving.com> 8/28/2009 10:52 AM >>>
Keith
If I understand your question correctly, we will have a piece of 36" RCP
between the manhole and the box structure for the connection just as if
it were two manholes.
I believe we will be placing a steel casing over the pipe and will have
to use ram neck or a rubber gasket around the casing. The settlement
issue should not be a problem as it will be backfilled just as would a
manhole and the adjoining RCP.
Brian, correct me if I am wrong.
Marty
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Marvin [mailto:kmarvin@ci.coppell.tx.us]
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 10:40 AM
To: James Scott
Cc: Marty Murphy
Subject: RE: CHANGE ORDER 1 FOR COPPELL ROAD
James,
Do you have an option 2 for a cast in place box connected to the
existing box?
If not, how do we connect this to the existing box, and how do we ensure
no settlement, and that it will be water tight?
Keith
Keith Marvin, P.E.
Project Engineer
(972) 304-3681
>>> "James Scott" <Jamess@JRJPaving.com> 8/28/2009 9:20 AM >>>
Here it is
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Marvin [mailto:kmarvin@ci.coppell.tx.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:06 PM
To: James Scott
Subject: RE: CHANGE ORDER 1 FOR COPPELL ROAD
Ok. The sooner the better.
Keith
Keith Marvin, P.E.
Project Engineer
(972) 304-3681
>>> "James Scott" <Jamess@JRJPaving.com> 8/27/2009 3:59 PM >>>
I just spoke to our sub contractor and he is putting the finishing
touches on it right now.
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Marvin [mailto:kmarvin@ci.coppell.tx.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 3:57 PM
To: James Scott
Cc: Richard Odell; Marty Murphy
Subject: RE: CHANGE ORDER 1 FOR COPPELL ROAD
James/Marty,
We need to close out Change Order #1. I need the pricing on the
water/storm box in Bethel in order to do that. Please send it over as
soon as you can. I need the final dollar amount for this change so I
can work on the sewer line change that needs to go to City Council.
If we don't have the numbers for CO #1 by Monday, then I can't do CO#2,
and we will miss the window for the 9/8 council meeting. If we miss
that meeting, we will not be able to get the sewer line approved until
the 9/22 City Council Meeting.
Keith
Keith Marvin, P.E.
Project Engineer
(972) 304-3681
>>> "James Scott" <Jamess@JRJPaving.com> 8/26/2009 10:25 AM >>>
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Marvin [mailto:KMARVIN@ci.coppell.tx.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 10:04 AM
To: James Scott
Subject: Re: CHANGE ORDER 1 FOR COPPELL ROAD
Is there supposed to be an attachment here?
-----Original Message-----
From: "James Scott" <Jamess@JRJPaving.com>
To: Keith Marvin <KMARVIN@ci.coppell.tx.us>
Sent: 8/26/2009 9:36:41 AM
Subject: RE: CHANGE ORDER 1 FOR COPPELL ROAD
After taling with my utilitie sub, it appears that they ran into s
problem with the SS at the service center. They need to lower it to
connect it. The attached change order reflects the work that neds to be
done. Apperently this is holding up my sub right now.
Thank you
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Marvin [mailto:kmarvin@ci.coppell.tx.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 8:47 AM
To: James Scott
Cc: Richard Odell; Marty Murphy
Subject: Re: CHANGE ORDER 1 FOR COPPELL ROAD
James,
Any word on the 16" water line box?
Keith
Keith Marvin, P.E.
Project Engineer
(972) 304-3681
>>> "James Scott" <Jamess@JRJPaving.com> 8/24/2009 10:26 AM >>>
Keith,
This is the change order # 1 we will send over the pricing for the 16"
box etc... by tomorrow
This is everything else tho.
James Scott
ost to improve crossing at south
Coppell rd. DOT number 789747J.
This invoice is over 90 days old. Please advise when FWWR can expect
payment
on invoice number 7542 for 640.00 and invoice number 7688 for 4720.00
Thanks and if you have any question please call me 817-529-7150
Charles Godsey
e less the amount owed to the
RR.
Keith
Keith Marvin, P.E.
Project Engineer
(972) 304-3681
>>> "Marty Murphy" <Martym@JRJPaving.com> 4/23/2010 10:05 AM >>>
Attached you will see that I am awaiting for them to get back with me
which has not happened to date. Per your email below you say you have
invoices for $74,377.97? I do not have a total amount that high.
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Marvin [mailto:kmarvin@coppelltx.gov]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 9:32 AM
To: Glenn Highland; Marty Murphy; Tery Chapman
Cc: Jerod Anderson; Ken Griffin
Subject: Fwd: RE: Crossing Agreement
Marty,
Have you had any further discussions with FWWR concerning these flagging
charges? They are now contacting our City Manager directly.
I am still holding invoice number 9 in the amount of $74,377.97. The
city does not intend to hold this invoice much longer, but we need to
have a resolution to this issue. If JRJ is not able to settle the issue
with FWWR by April 30, 2010 the city will withhold the $7,180 due from
this invoice, and process the balance for payment. The city will then
make payment to FWWR from project funds.
Please let me know by 4/30/10 whether you have come to an agreement with
the railroad.
Keith Marvin, P.E.
Project Engineer
(972) 304-3681
>>> Clay Phillips 4/23/2010 8:37 AM >>>
Charles,
It is my understanding that our contractor, JRJ, is obligated to pay for
the crossing reconstruction including the expenses associated with these
invoices which apparently pay someone $640/day to monitor the site for
trains that might require the clearing of construction workers. Keith
Marvin on our staff is th eprimary contact person. I also understand
that you or representatives of FWWR are having discussions regarding
this issue with JRJ. It is the City's intention to hold the contractor
to their obligation and pay for all costs associated with the crossing
reconstruction.
Please contact Keith Marvin at kmarvin@coppelltx.gov to discuss the
details of the issue further. Feel free to contact me directly if
necessary.
Clay Phillips
City Manager
City of Coppell
(972)304-3662
cphillips@coppelltx.gov
>>> "Charles Godsey" <cpg@fwwr.net> 4/23/2010 7:24 AM >>>
I have attached all outstanding invoices. If you have any questions
please
give me a call at 817-529-7150.
Thanks
Charles Godsey
FWWR
-----Original Message-----
From: Clay Phillips [mailto:cphillips@coppelltx.gov]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:13 PM
To: Charles Godsey
Subject: Re: Crossing Agreement
Charles,
I do not recall seeing an invoice regarding this issue. I will check
with
our staff and someone will get back to you very soon with an answer.
Thank
you for bringing this to my attention. Please send all future emails
intended for me tot he address below or feel free to contact me via the
phone number below.
Clay Phillips
City Manager
City of Coppell
(972)304-3662
cphillips@coppelltx.gov
>>> "Charles Godsey" <cpg@fwwr.Ɯ鴀쭑·ᚂ䶈ᙽ