Loading...
Eckerd's-LR 981231 (2) GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEI-~,NG · ENVIRONMENTAL CONSU LTING GEE Consultants, Inc. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING 10046 Monroe Drive · Dallas, Texas 75229 · (214) 352-5433 · Fax (214) 352-6972 REPORT OF CONCRETE MIX INSPECTION Report Date: December 31, 1998 Date Concrete Placed: December 3, 1998 Standard 6"x12" Client: North American Properties-SW Area 28.27 Square Inches ProJect: Eckerds - Coppell Concrete Report No.: 4 Contractor: C.A. Walker Project No.: 298-0412 Concrete Supplier and Plant: TXI Plant/#41 Location of Placement: Piers MATERIALS Source,' SSO ~,,c, w,,. INSPECTION DATA Descripti(m , Lbs:CuYd! Mix Number: 47 Time Sample Batched: 09:30 am Cement: 5.5 Sacks Time Sampled: 10:15 am Fly Ash: Sample Locanon: B-b; M-§.I Truck/Ticket No: 805/1193521 Coarse Aggregate: Temperature: Intermediate Aggregate: Ambtent Range: ':2*F Fine Aggregate: Concrete Range: 78°F Admixtures: Slump Range iinches): 4." Weather Conditions: Cloudy I Time Started: 06:00 am 2 Time Completed: 03:00 pm Added Water: 10 Gallons Sample Air Content { % ~: N/A Total Cubic Yards Placed: 10 Required Strength (Lbs.:sq.in.): 4.000 Spec~n'en Measurca Age Date To(al Load Compressive Streng~ Remarks Numoer Slump i,n.i I Da_'.-s ) Tesled ~Lbs. i iLbs..Sq.ln.} ECK 13 7 12/10/98 118,760 4,200 ECK 14 28 12/31/98 169,820 6,010 ,J,." ECK 15 28 12/31/98 165,220 5,840 ECK 16 H HOLD Test Methods Utilized Fracture Regular Cylinders Made By: HG ASTM C-31.C-39.C-143 lUnless Noted Otherw~se'~ ' Remarks and/or Dismbution: cc: Mr. John Maggiore - North American Properties -SW Mr. Lance Lilly - Richmond Group Architecture & Planning Mr. Gary Stokes - C.A. Walker Construction Mr. Lee Stone - City of Coppell Mr. Larry. Davis - Cits' of Coppell All letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not he repfoduce~ vithout the full approval of GEE Comultants. Inc. The ~c of our ~me mtat receive mir prior wrtuen approval. Our letters and reports apply only to the sample tes~x[ and/or impeetnd and are no{ necessarily indicative of the quant]ties of apparently identical or similar p~oducts.