Eckerd's-LR 981231 (3) GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEL,.,NG
. GEE Consultants,
Inc.
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING
10046 Monroe Drive · Dallas, Texas 75229 · (214) 352-5433 ° Fax (214) 352-6972
REPORT OF CONCRETE MIX INSPECTION
Report Date: December 31, 1998 Date Concrete Placed: December 3, 1998 Standard 6'x12"
Client: First United Methodist Church of Coppell Area 28.27 Square Inches
Pro}ect: First United Methodist Church-Sanctuary Concrete Report No.: 5
Coppell, Texas
Contractor: Strand Tech, Inc. Project No.: 298-0394
Concrete Supplier and Plant: Mid-Cities
Location i~f Placement: Firelane
MATERIALS ~,,~, sso Ba,~.. w~. INSPECTION DATA
D~scr,puon {Lhe. CuYd)
Mix Number: 9331 Time Sample Batched: 11:02 am
Cement: Time Sampled: 12:00 pm
Fly Ash: Sample Location: 150' N. & 90' E. of NE comer of existing
building
Coarse Aggregate: Truck/Ticket No: 391/45805
Intermediate Aggregate: Temperature:
Fine Aggregate: Ambient Range: 72°F
Admixtures: Concrete Range: 80°F
Slump Range 1inches): 5~A''
I Weather Conditions: Cloudy
2 Time Started: 09:30 am
Added Water: 0 Gallons Time Completed: 01:14 pm
Sample Air Content (%): 4%
Total Cubic Yards Placed: 20
Required Strength (Lbs.lsq.in.): 3.000
Speomen Measureu Age Dale Total Load Compressive Su'ength Rcnutrks
Nmnher S; umW) I:n. ~ i Days ~ Tea ted !Lbs. I I Lbs..'Sq. In. )
FUMC 17 7 12/10/98 88,660 3,140 Cylinders laying down when picked
FUMC 18 5 IA." 28 12/31/98 125,860 4,450 up from site.
FUMC 19 28 12/31/98 130,960 4,630
FUMC 20 H HOLD
Test Methocls Uuliz~d Fracture Regular
ASTM C-31.C-39.C-;43 {Unless .~o~ed Otherw,s¢~ Cylinders Made By: HG
Remarks and/or Distribution:
cc: Ms. Lynn Johnson - First United Methodist Church
Mr. Charles Harper - Harper Perkins Architects
Mr. Larry Davis - City of Coppell
Mr. Bill Anderson - Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc.
H
All letters and repons are for the exclus,ve use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall nm he reproduce~ the full approval of GEE Co~.ultann. Inc. The use of our .'mine must receive
our prmr writmn approval. Our letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or impect~l and are nm necessarily indicative of the quantmes of apparently identical or similar proclucts.