RE Main Street - Lots 10R 11R Block DThe east end of the SVC 1 pad is only 2 tenths higher than the rear
alley I believe?
We couldn’t figure out a way to put the ramp in the public walk (unless
we move the light pole) since the people getting out of the cars would
be blocked by the handrail?
We can move it north if you prefer.
Thanks,
Gregory K. Yancey
Provident Company, Inc.
PO Box 1790
Coppell, TX 75019
V (214) 215-9400
F (214) 276-1709
gregyancey@verizon.net <mailto:gregyancey@verizon.net>
From: Michael Garza [mailto:MGarza@coppelltx.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:49 PM
To: Greg Yancey
Cc: Keith Marvin; Matt Steer
Subject: RE: Main Street - Lots 10R; 11R Block D
Greg,
I do not have any objections to your proposed handrail locations, I
think you have the right idea. For both buildings there is an island in
front of one tree well so that will help with the parking issue a
little. You may be able to reduce the finish floor by half a foot on
service 2 which would help with your slope in the service court area.
Just as a general question, why are all the pads so high? I do have some
concerns with the public ramp/walk that gets onto the private property.
You may need to dedicate a sidewalk easement by separate instrument to
accommodate this.
If you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience.
Thanks,
Michael Garza, P.E.
Civil Engineer
City of Coppell
972-304-7019
From: Greg Yancey [mailto:gregyancey@verizon.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 7:07 PM
To: Michael Garza
Cc: Keith Marvin; Matt Steer
Subject: Main Street - Lots 10R; 11R Block D
Hi Michael:
We’ve been working on the Service 1 & 2 lots on Houston Street to see
how we can make the public sidewalks work with the proposed building
footprints.
This is the answer we have right now and want City Staff opinions
before we move these properties toward the DRC process.
Like Lewisville and Roanoke, the sidewalks require steps from the
street to the sidewalks.
In Roanoke, the steps are not adjacent to parking. In Lewisville, they
have the same detail we do with angled parking areas. Roanoke’s handrail
details made more sense to me so I attached those photos.
We tried to keep the first stair riser far enough from the curb that a
vehicle would not strike the handrail extensions around the treewells.
The treewells are still the full 4’6” x 10’ like the rest of this block.
Parking in the service court area on the south side of the buildings is
problematic since the slopes are as great as 5%, far beyond the 2% TDLR
would permit. Our recommendation is not striping those areas.
We have no immediate plans to build Service 2, but do want to start
Service 1 soon. We can’t bring it through the process without planning
the walks to Hammond.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks,
Gregory K. Yancey
Provident Company, Inc.
PO Box 1790
Coppell, TX 75019
V (214) 215-9400
F (214) 276-1709
gregyancey@verizon.net <mailto:gregyancey@verizon.net>