Enclaves-CS 940421 CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE: Stone Creek Addition (formerly The Marks
Apartments Addition), Preliminary Plat
P & Z HEARING DATE: April 21, 1994 (January 20, 1994, Preliminary Plat denied)
C. C. HEARING DATE: May 10, 1994
LOCATION: Along Parkway Boulevard, approximately 1,000 feet east of Heartz Road.
SIZE OF AREA: 5.843 acres of land, to be utilized for a 124 unit apartment complex
CURRENT SF-7 as passed by City Council on April 12, 1994
ZONING:
REQUEST: Approval of a preliminary plat to construct a 124 unit apartment
complex
APPLICANT: Jonas Properties Lane's Southwest Surveying
Glen Brovant (Prospective Owner) Jim Lane (Surveyor)
11615 Forest Central 3149 Highway//67, Suite F
Suite 100 Mesquite, TX 75150
Dallas, Tx. 75243 (214) 681-4442
(214) 553-5531
HISTORY: This plat was originally scheduled for Planning Commission review on
December 16, 1993, but was rescheduled by the applicant for January
consideration. In January the Planning Commission denied the request for
a number of reasons including the fact that topo was not shown on the
replat. The applicant has now resubmitted the plat.
TRANSPORTATION: Parkway Blvd. is a (C4D), four lane divided roadway built to
standard, in a 90-110 foot r.o.w.
Item 6
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North -Kid Country and Park; TC
South - single family; PD
East - single family; TH-2
West - developing single family; SF-7
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Plan shows single family uses as most appropriate for this
parcel
ANALYSIS: The History section of this report outlines the activities which have occurred on
this parcel in recent months. After the January Commission meeting and the plat
denial, it was staff's understanding that the applicant was going to make a
concerted effort to address the concerns of the Commission relative to the
drainage issue. When this plat was re-submitted in April, the drainage issue was
left unresolved, and staff concerns with that problem remained. On April 12,
1994, the Council held a public hearing to consider proper zoning for this tract
and by unanimous vote elected to zone the property for SF-7 use--a proposed use
incidentally, which had been discussed over a time frame which extended beyond
the original plat submittal.
Because of the Council action, and the fact that the plat before the Planning
Commission delineates multi-family platting, the plat should be denied, and that
is staff's recommendation.
ALTERNATIVES: 1) Approve the preliminary plat
2) Deny the preliminary plat
3) Modify the preliminary plat
ATI'ACHMENTS: 1) Preliminary plat