Enclaves-CS 950615 (2) MEMORANDUM
To: Alan Johnson, Finance Director
Via: Ken Griffin, P.E., City Engineer/Assistant City Manager
From: Doug Stevens, Eng. Tech
RE: Partial Reimbursement of 2% Construction Inspection Fee for Enclaves
Date: June 15, 1995
On April 14, 1995, a 2% construction inspection fee for the Enclaves on the Parkway was
paid in the amount of $1,911.00. Since that time the contractor has separated the
construction costs of the channel to be $48,420.80 developer's cost and $42,387.00 city's
cost. Since the council has agreed to reimburse the developer up to $44,688.00, and since
the city normally doesn't charge an inspection fee for city funded projects, the contractor and
developer has submitted a request for reimbursement in the amoum of $942.58 or 2 % of the
$42,387.00. Enclosed please find the letter of request, a copy of the check paid, as well as
the journal emry of the finance departmem verifying paymem. The reimbursement should be
made to:
WPC-Parkway Developmem Corporation, Inc.
Operation Accoum
3960 Broadway, Suite 125
Garland, TX 75043
enclosures
f:\.., reimburs\enclaves
Cook-Jackson, Inc.
A '-EGHNIGAL SERVICES GQMPANY
June 8, 1995
M r. Doug Stevens
Engineering
City of Coppell
255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas 75019
Subject: Inspectior, Fees for The Enclaves on the Parkway
Dear Doug,
Over the past few days I have been ask about the inspection fees that we paid on the
Enclaves. Enclosed are copies of the canceled checks for the fees we paid. Based on
these checks we have paid the following fees:
Contract Amount Fee Paid
Excavation $13,500.00 $270.00
Utilities 81,184.55 1,623.69
Paving 87,513.25 1,750.27
Channel Retaining Walls 95,550.00 1,911.00
Wastewater Impact Fee 9,450.00
Water Impact Fee 14,175.00
Park Fee 26,985.00
I have previously submitted the contracts for the excavation, utilities and paving and I am
enclosing a copy of the channel wall contract which I have not submitted. When we had
the pre-construction meeting for the project we had not finalized our contract for the
walls so I used an estimate to calculate the fee. The fee also is based on both sides of the
channel. As you know, the east and south sides are to be paid for by the City. During one
of our conversations you mentioned that the City would not charge itself an inspection
fee; therefore I believe that we are due a reimbursement or credit of $942.58. This is
calculated as follows:
Original fee basis $95,000.00 $1,911.00
Actual Contract 90,807.80
Less city Portion (Area B) 42,387.00
Developer Portion 48,420.80 968.42
Refund/Credit Due $942.58
P.O. BOX 2728 · DALLAS. TEXAS 75221-2728 · (214) 565-1105
Mr. Doug Stevens
The Enclaves on the Parkway
Page 2
According to my records, we still owe 8171.99 for street signs mid the erosion control
bond or payment. Is it possible to use the channel wall inspection fee refund to offset
these outstanding fees, or do you want us to pay these fees separately and you refund us
for the overpayment of the channel inspection fee?
Doug, please review this and let me know how you want to handle it. I hope to be in a
position to final this project next week.
Sincerely ~- ~
Keith Jac~__~n
enclosures
xc: Mr. David Blom
-'i
EXHI'RIT "A"
CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL
Area A 4,384 sq.fL $9.95/s.f. $43,620.80
Area B 4,260 sq. fl:. 9.95/$.f. 42,387.00
Sidewalk Wall 480 sq. ft. 10.00/s.f. 4,800.00
TOTAL BI~D $90,807.80
Contractor shall provide structural engineering plans to the City of Coppell for approval.
· WPO..PARKWAY DEVELC; ENT CORPORATION, INC. I 0 0/-+
QP~RATIN~ ACCOUNT
3~0 BROADWAY, SUITE 125 ~8-123/1119
GARLAND, ~ 75043 _
WPO-PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC.
OPFJRAI'ING ACCOUNT
3~0 BROADWAY, SUITE 1~
by__~_~' JOURNAL ED,
::)proyed by POSTED
FUND: DATE: "f- ~ '~-¢,',.V' DATE:
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT DR. CR.
NUMBER
/ I -
TOTAL