Coppell Heights- DRC1501161 of 1
COPPELL
CITY OF COPPELL
COPPELL
*
,
DRC REPORT
1/28/2015
�,.
M
review only. They are not the result of a full Building
Protect ID
RPNR-15-0004
Protect No.
Coppell Heights Addition, Lots 9C1 & 9C2, Block r
Address
920 5 Belt Line Rd
Proiect Type
Replat- Non -Res
Application Date
1/16/2015
Case Manaoer
NO Steer
Proiect Description
, to allow the subdivision of
the existing property into two lots (one building per lot) and
provide for shared packing, dumpers and access
on 2.6 acres
Tim Oates
1/26/2015
1 of 1
Agency
Reviewed By
Review Data
Comments
Building Inspection
Jack Foster
1/28/2015
1. These Comments are the result of a site plan
review only. They are not the result of a full Building
plan review. Further comments should be expected
when building and related plans are submitted with
permit application(s).
2. Will there be a shared parking agreement?
3. Parking may be an issue due to possibility of
restaurant with drive-through.
Engineering
Fire Administration
Tim Oates
1/26/2015
Fire lane easement shall encompass the entire width
of the three (3) drive openings to city streets. Once
the fire lane intersects the tat drive aisle, it may
taper down to 24-8.
Parks and Recreation
John Elias
1/2842015
No Comments
Planning Department
Matt Steer
1/28/2015
1. Label all existing and proposed easements.
2. Rename to Lot 9C1 & 9C2, Block A, Coppell
Heights Rapist and revise all areas of plat
accordingly.
3. Move vicinity map to the top right corner of the
plat.
4. Include owners signature blank. below the owners
dedication.
5. include bearing and distance of property line on
Sanders Loop.
COPPELL
as
Proect ID
Address
Proiect Tvce
Aoolicatlon Date
Case Manager
PD -15-0003
920 S Bell Dns Rd
Re -Zoning PD
1/182015
Mad Steer
CITY OF COPPELL COP FELL
DRC REPORT w
Proiect Name PD 278R, Copped Heights Add, Lots 9C1 8 9C2,
Proiect Description a zoning change request from R(Retail) to Planned Development 278R (Planned Development 278-RetaiO to allow the subdivision of
the existing property into two lots (one building per lot) and provide for shared parking, dumpers and access and to establish a
landscape variance
Agency Reviewed By
Building Inspection Jack Foster
Po r---���4V-�
Engineering
Fire Administration Tim Oates
Parks and Recreation John Elias
Planning Department Matt Steer
1 of 2
Review Data Comments
1/28/2015 1. These Comments are the result of a site plan
review only. They are not the result of a full Building
plan review. Further comments should be expected
when building and related plans are submitted with
permit application(s).
2. Need dumpster for Lot 9D
3. Curb not shown at SE corner of lot.
1/26/2015 The Fire Department does not have any issues with
the proposed zoning change request.
1/28/2015 No Comments
1/28/2015 1. Revise lot naming convention to "Lots 9C1 8 91
Block A, Copped Heights Addition". Ensure all
documents and plans are revised accordingly.
2. If there are shared utilities, please include in
private agreement.
Site Plan:
1. Additional signage is not allowed on Sanders Loop.
2. Monument Sign height dimension is measured from
peak of sign to grade; therefore, proposal is too large.
3. Show all setbacks and existing and proposed
easements on site plan.
4. Label property to the north (Lot 9A, Block A) as
Retail zoning.
5. Label lots and buildings within there respective
footprints on plan.
6. Add parking to the northeast corner of parking lot
northeast of Building A, as the total parking provided
is two spaces deficient for medical office.
7. Correct proposed property line on site plan.
8. Note that no signage will be allowed on the east
elevation of Building A and south elevation of Building
B as this is considered the rear of the buildings.
9. Dimension parking spaces and all building
setbacks.
10. Verify 8.2' dimension on west property line of
building A.
11. Include a PD Conditions table outlining the
sideyard setback deficiencies and the 10' perimeter
COPPELL
-MW,k *
Agency
CITY OF COPPELL
DRC REPORT
COPPELL
Reviewed By Review Date comments
buffer requirement not being met on the mutual
property line of both lots.
12. Remove the off premise advertaing from the
draft agreement as this is not allowed.
Tree Survey:
1. Several tree deficiencies on both lots are evident
and should be addressed on the Landscape Plan.
Landscape Plan:
1. The Landscape Plan needs to include the entire
property not just Building A.
2. Landscape summary for area calculations:
Required Area:
a. Perimeter is 15' adjacent to rights-cf-way and 10'
adjacent to interior lots;
b. Interior (parking lot landscaping) is 10% of parking
paved area including all abutting sidewalks and ensure
that the end of each parking row has a landscape
island (min. 150 square feet) with no more than 15
spaces without an island;
c. Nonvehicular landscape area is 15% (site area -
building area).
These are all stand alone categories and cannot be
counted more than once.
3. Landscape summary for calculations and tree
requirements:
a. Revise tree calculations to show 18 required trees
for interior as there are 18 existing parking islands that
can accommodate and overstory tree,
b. 35 total perimeter trees as one tree is required per
40 feet along the Belt Line frontages and one tree per
50 feet along the interior property lines, and
c. nonvehicular open space requires 1 tree per 2,500
square feel.