Loading...
ST9902-LR1310110 �urr�ce C'�OT�Ct1f11CflL C�iOUP Consulting Engineering * Geotechnical Engineering * Construction Materials 3228 Halifax Street, Suite A, Dallas, Texas 75247 Phone: (972) 444 -8889 Fax: (972) 444 -8893 Acct ID: 1770 File No: C13 -0634 Report Date: 10/11/2013 Previously Reported: 09/24/2013 Project: West Sandy Lake Road Location: Bent #2, Sampled: Bent #2 above Column 2E Client: City of Coppell Date Sampled: 09/13/2013 Sampled By: Armas, Brandon By Order Of: Order Number: 1770 Number of Specimens: 5 REPORT: REPORT OF CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST LAB NO: 151320 Material: Concrete Test Method: See Below TEST RESULTS Report No: 151320 Page 1 of 1 Maximum Compressive Average Spec Age Tested Diameter Area Load Cure Strength Strength Tested Nbr (date : days) (in) (in 2) (Ibs) Break Type Loc (PSI) (PSI) By Comments A 09/16/13: 3 6.00 28.27 78,855 Type 3 Lab 2,790 2,790 B 09/20/13: 7 6.00 28.27 95,695 Type 3 Lab 3,380 3,380 C 10/11/13: 28 6.00 28.27 118,120 Type 3 Lab 4,180 D 10/11/13: 28 6.00 28.27 113,710 Type 3 Lab 4,020 4,100 E HOLD (see remarks) - F P-Im Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5 Type 6 Specification CONFORMS Strength: 3,600 psi @ 28 days Slump: 3 -5 Slump: 5.0 Inches Transported By: LMC Air Content: 3 -6 Air Content: 4.0% Source /Sampled At: Truck / Center Mix Code: 5409 Plant: 955 Date Received: 09/14/2013 Truck /Ticket No: 1424 / 64349617 Curing Method: Standard Time Sampled: 2:00 pm Time Batched: 12:56 pm Temp.: Ambient: 96 °F Mix: 93 °F Quantity Represented: 9 cu. yds. at 9 cu. yds. placed of a 17 cu. yd. total placement Remarks: Test Method (As Applicable): Unless noted, concrete was sampled and tested in accordance with ASTM C31, C172, C143, C231 or C173, C1064 and C138. Compressive strength tests per ASTM C39. Client: City of Coppell Attn: Mr. Rick O'Dell (1 -cc copy) Ong: City of Coppell (Coppell, TX) Attn: Mr. Keith Marvin, P.E. Respectfully Submitted, Alliance Geotechnical Group el— %T Perry C. Kakara, CME Department Manager THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED AND /OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS OR PROCEDURES, NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ONGOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENTAND ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION.