Freeport NIP(3)-CS 950427Mr Sim Witt
Coppell
255 Parkway Blvd
PO Box 478
Coppe~
Re ~ss
Dear Jim ~
001/003
MEPC American
PrQperl]~ In=
1 ~_ _I~_ DGdi~ Partflv~y
Suite 100 I_BlO
D,dlas Texa~ 75248
April 27, 1995
Thank you for your assistance on the above referenced project Cka/muute International
and MI~ rem_sin inter~tcd in the possibility of constructing fadlifle~ in such park As
discussed, the following is a list of rernsinln~/ssues MEPC and Craftmade would like to
~hSFirm '
~.5] u~x abatement deal in place as soon as posdble for the full 32 acre site.
~\/o~ ~-~ ~ Coppell to provide m~dian cuts (includin8 any utility relocation im.nact)
~ o t- ~ ~--,,~ Craftmade buiJains and thc future lViBPC buila~n~(s).
~/~ ~ to us~ 4,000 psi concrete in lieu o~ llme stabilizatioll.~~j
Property to be re-platted as soon as possible. '~- ~
MEPC to ?,uild ]20' deep truck court at we~t side of Cra_fmc-ac bui]di~ which
wi]] go 120 beyond the evcumal Craflmade property line (o-ce pitted as two
sites).
Defer the lanchcaping of the site adjacent to thc ~de building until thc
time of construction of such second 5uildi.& ! ~
No landscape islands for the entire site and no landscaping except in the areas
shown on the attached site plan. f~ '/* :?
Need extremely fast approval of all perm/ts (I suggest wc meet to discuss
MHPC and Cka/tmade will not be responsible for Cr¢ckvicw Drive extension or
assodated impact fees and such will not affect MF_.PC's re-platting process.
Cvfading to commence prior to landscape plan submittal.
Craflmade requires no more than 150 parking spaces which would require a
Coppell to allow MEPC flexibility in selecting landscape trees and shrubs.
04/'27/95
16:19 ~214 2;15 1717 kIUESTECB 8BRVICI~
~ OO~/OO~
mmmm
2
Jim, it is important for us to address these item~ as soon as possible and I would
recommend that we arrange a meeting between our engineers, architect, lartdscape
arch/mc-t, contractor and the pertinent people at Coppell to go over these issues in more
deudl. Th~nk you for your cooperation in this matter.
$ineerely,
Ab Atldns
Re~nal Vice President
Industrial
Enclomre(s)
jimwit~l.ltr
'~'~ ~00
ESCROW / ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CALCULA,IONS
PROJECT:
DATE:
MECP, Lot 2 (Freeport North)
4/6/95
ESCROW:
Street Name(s) Creekwiew Dr.
Street T~ae C2U
~ost per Foot $110.00
m~th of Adjacent Frontage (Linear Feet) 900
Escrow due = (Cost per Foot) x (Length of Adjacent Frontage) = $99,000.00
ROADWAY IMPACT FEE:
Service Area *
Category **
I.and Use **
Building Size (Sq. Ft.)
Development Units **
Vehicle Miles per Development Unit
Fee per Vehicle Mile
INDUSTRIAL
GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
259,200
259
** 1.06
$300
Roadway Impact Fee due = (Development Units) x
(Vehicle Miles per Development Unit) x (Fee per Vehicle Mile) = $82,362.00
Amount due is the lesser of the Street Escrow or the Roadway Impact Fee.
* (Figure 2 - Roadway Impact Fee Study)
** (Table 3 - Roadway Impact Fee Study)
ESCR~)W / ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CALCULA ~ IONS
PROJECT:
DATE:
MECP, Lot I (Freeport North)
4/6/95
ESCROW:
Street Name(s) I Creekview Dr.
Street Type ! C2U
Cost per Foot $110.00
Lend-th of Adjacent Frontage (Linear Feet) 0
Escrow due = (Cost per Foot) x (Length of Adjacent Frontage) =
ROADWAY IMPACT FEE:
;ervice Area * 4
Category ** INDUSTRIAL
Land Use ** GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Building Size (Sq. Ft.) 368,000
Developmem Units ** 368
Vehicle Miles per Development Unit ** 1.06
Fee per Vehicle Mile $300
Roadway Impact Fee due = (Development Units) x
Vehicle Miles per Development Unit) x (Fee per Vehicle Mile) = $11~7,024.00
Amount due is the lesser of the Street Escrow or the Roadway Impact Fee.
* (Figure 2 - Roadway Impact Fee Study)
** (Table 3 - Roadway Impact Fee Study)
Ioo0
~o
60000
ro ~, ooo