Hooptown-CS001116 (2) CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO.: PD-189R, HOOPTOWN
P & Z HEARING DATE: November 16, 2000
C.C. HEARING DATE: December 12, 2000
LOCATION: Along the north side of Beltline Road, approximately 1,200 feet
east of the intersection of Beltline and Denton Tap Roads.
SIZE OF AREA: Approximately 17.761 acres of property (Lot 1, Block A
Hooptown).
CURRENT ZONING: PD-189-LI (Planned Development-189, Light Industrial)
REQUEST: Zoning change request to amend PD-189 to allow the enlargement of
the lot area for the construction of a 109,000 square foot facility
containing 10 basketball court and related activities.
APPLICANT: Applicant: Engineer:
Hooptown, LLC Stock & Associates
708 S. College St., Ste. 209 425 N. New Ballas, Ste. 165
McKinney, Texas 75069 St. Lois, Missouri 63141
(214) 544-2300 (314) 432-8100
Fax: (214) 544-2302 Fax: (314) 432-8171
HISTORY: On October 10, 2000, City Council approved a Preliminary Plat and
zoning change from Light Industrial to PD-189 to allow the
development of an indoor basketball/recreation facility on 17.063
acres.
As approved by City Council on October 10, 2000, the proposed site
plan removed 892' of protected trees. In accordance with the zoning
ordinance, only 50% landscape credit could be given due to the
removal of 100% of the existing trees. The landscape credit
accounted for 446' of removed trees; requiting monetary reparation
of $100 per caliper tach for the remaining 446" of removed trees. As
indicated by the owner/developer, the tree mitigation dramatically
impacted the anticipated cost of the project.
Item#4
TRANSPORTATION: East Belt Line Road is proposed to be a P6D, six- lane divided major
thoroughfare built within a 120' wide right-of-way. Construction is
scheduled to begin in the fourth quarter this year.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North- Raikoad, CreekviewAddition; "SF-9-PD"
South- North Lake, City of Dallas
East - TXU Electric & Gas Right-of-Way, vacant; "LI" Light Industrial
West - Vacant, Shake & Shingle; "LI" Light Industrial
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable for
light industrial/showroom uses
DISCUSSION: The purpose of this request is to revise the property line between Lots 1 & 2
of Block A of the Hooptown Development. The property line between Lots 1
& 2, as shown on the approved plan, is a straight line extending fi.om the
fi.ont to the rear property lines (See attached Approved PD Plan). Due to
extensive tree mitigation costs associated with the development of Lot 1, the
applicant proposes to extend the land area of LOt 1 further west to include
additional trees that were previously located off-site. The revision will
transfer .70 of an acre fi.om Lot 2 to LOt 1. LOt 1 will be enlarged to 17.761
acres and Lot 2 will be decreased to 9.302 acres.
It is staff's intention to maintain a traditionally shaped Lot 2, while
providing a natural buffer along the rear of the property. The applicant has
worked with staff to create an acceptable solution to the re-design of the
shared property line between Lots 1 and 2. While staff does not encourage
the intentional design of non-traditional lots to reduce tree mitigation
costs, the extension of Lot 1 behind Lot 2 will provide a perpetual natural
landscape buffer between the residential properties to the north and any
future uses on Lot 2. Therefore, although somewhat unusual in shape, in
this particular case, staff can support the request to revise the property
areas.
On October 14, 2000, a brush fire occurred on the subject property,
destroying a significant number of trees; many which were to be
preserved. The attached tree survey reflects the damage caused by the
fire. The additional land area for Lot 1, coupled with provision of
additional trees to be planted around the building, brings the number of
preserved trees to an adequate level, equalizing the tree mitigation costs.
Item#4
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed amendment, subject to the following
condition:
1) Revise inconsistencies among lot areas shown on plan sheets.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Approved PD Plan (App'd 10-10-2000)
2) Site Plan
3) Existing Tree/Vegetation Plan
4) Existing Tree Plan (Detail)
5) Revised PD Plan
Item # 4
Inl.dNT l
.,.o...,...--...,...,.,,.... ""' "' , ,,,,~-t,__~--pp_,.--. ,--- ', ..... '-~ M m m.'--'J~'l~-- /y~,."7/".,,..,l~. \\
~.~--~-"-""---'~-"~'~'~ ..... ~ .... -/-~,"--~ % ~ .--- ~-~' '~i'~'"'""~--,-~'-~"~-N,I'' /'x ;¥'
.__.,~=,.= .... -._. ........ .~. ~:~' ,~. ~~%.m.. ~-C - =-,-..----
, .--...~..-----.___~._.~...----~ !/ - ..
· ,'"~"'T'~'--""--~ ....... ~ ~ '
Om' Og--- ~ '"~'"'"'"'"[""" '-': ,
-- ' -- '
[__[ ~ , · HI~'~'--
/
_.__~.21. · e , ---
'11"~ '- °"'l' °'"l"' '" ~I .... :'T"I, "~ I''~ II i I ~1~1~111~' L2
---- ~',L..
PLAT 1
& LOT 2, BLOCK A '
K $UR~Y, ,~$~ACT No. 312