Gulf Bearing-LR 950830TECHNOLOGIES INC
· Maxim Tech.. Southwestern Labs
2575 Lone Star Dr. · P.O. Box 224227
Dallas, Texas 75222
Telephone: (214) 631-2700
FAX: (214) 920-1891
CUENT:
PROJECT:
SERVICES:
REPORT OF
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
Gulf Bearing, Inc.
Attn: Ross Ramsay
501 Industrial Blvd.
Grapevine, TX 76051 CLIENT NO.: 3200037
REPORT NO.: 29408
Gulf Bearing DATE OF SERVICE: 8/21/95
Coppell, Texas AUTHORIZATION: ongoing
REPORT DATE: 8/30/95
Sample concrete at location of placement, perform required field tests,
prepare and test concrete compressive strength specimens.
CONTRACTOR: Rogers O' Brian
CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Lattimore
PLANT: 7
SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
STRENGTH: 4000psi @ 28 DAYS
SLUMP: 5" Max.
AIR: N/A
METHOD OF TEST: ASTM C-39
ASTM C- 143
PROJECT DATA
CLASS OF CONCRETE: Mix Number 44
DATE OF PLACEMENT: 8/21/95
TIME SAMPLED: 07:45AM BY: Larry Bracken
TEMPERATURE ('F)-AIR: 79 CONCRETE: 87
TRUCK NO: 300 TICKET NO: 7013199
AIR CONTENT(%): 4.5
LOCATION OF PLACEMENT:
Panel ~,~22 mlddle
CYLINDER MEASURED
MARKED SLUMP DATE AGE
SET NO. (inches) TESTED (days)
1 1 5.50 8/24/95 3
1 2 5.50 8/24/95 3
1 3 5.50 8/28/95 7
1 4 9/18/95 28
1 5 9/18/95 28
1 6 HOLD HOLD
REPORT OF TESTS
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH - 6 X 12 CYLINDERS
MAXIMUM COMPRESSIVE
DIAMETER AREA LOAD STRENGTH
(in,) (sq.in.) (lbs. force) (psi)
6.00 28.27 100360 3550
6.00 28.27 107200 3790
6.00 28.27 107710 3810
REMARKS
Report Of Tests Continued On Page 2
1001 LW
Our letters and reports are for the exc usive use of the c ant to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in
full without the approval of the testing aboratory The use of ourname must race ve our written approval. Our letters and reports
apply only to the sample tested and/or inspected, and are not nd cat ve of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products·
Gulf Bearing, Inc.
CLIENT NO. 3200037
DATE OF SERVICE: 8/21/95
REPORT NO.
PAGE 2
SET NO. 1
29408
REPORT OF TESTS (Continued)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Added 10 gallons water prior to test sample.
discharge.
Test sample taken at truck
Technician: Larry Bracken
Started: 06:30AM Stopped: ll:30AM
Report Of Tests Continued On Page 3
1001 LW
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the c ient to whom they are acidressed and shall not be reproduced except in
full without the approval of the testing aboratory The use of ourname must receive our written approval. Our letters and reports
apply only to the sarnple tested and/or inspected, and are not nd cat ye of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products,
Gulf Bearing, Inc.
CLIENT NO. 3200037
DATE OF SERVICE: 8/21/95
REPORT NO.
PAGE 3
SET NO. 2
29408
CONTRACTOR: Rogers O'Brien
CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Lattimore
PLANT: 7
SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
STRENGTH: 4000psi @ 28 DAYS
SLUMP: 5" Max.
AIR: N/A
METHOD OF TEST: ASTM ¢- 39
ASTM C- 143
REPORT OF
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
(Cont i nued)
PROJECT DATA
CLASS OF CONCRETE: Mix Number 44
DATE OF PLACEMENT: 8/21/95
TIME SAMPtED: iO:07AM BY: Larry Bracken
TEMPERATURE ('F) - AIR: 84 CONCRETE: 89
TRUCK NO: 573 TICKET NO: 7013210
AIR CONTENT(%): 5.0
LOCATION OF PLACEMENT:
Panel ~/82 bottom
CYLINDER MEASURED
MARKED SLUMP DATE
SET NO. (inches) TESTED
REPORT OF TESTS
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH -6 X 12 CYLINDERS
MAXIMUM
AGE DIAMETER AREA LOAD
(days) (in.) (sq.in.) (lbs. force)
2 1 6.25 8/24/95 3
2 2 6.25 8/24/95 3
2 3 6.25 8/28/95 7
2 4 9/18/95 28
2 5 9/18/95 28
2 6 HOLD HOLD
COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH
(psi)
6.00 28.27 85350 3020
6.00 28.27 88960 3150
6.00 28.27 89600 3170
REMARKS
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Test sample taken at truck discharge.
Technician: Larry Bracken Started: 06:30AM Stopped' ll:30AM
Report Distribution: MAXIM TECH.~SOUTHWESTERN LABS
(1) (;u[f Bearing, Inc.
(1) Gromatzky, Dupree & Associates ~
(1) Brockette, Davis, Drake
,\,
(2) Rogers o'arien F. King Cook, P.E
(1) City of Coppe[[ '
,O~)l)LwCity of Coppe[[
Our letters and reports are for the exc us ve use of the client to wi3om they are addressed ancl shall not be reproduced except in
fu without the approva of the testng aboratory. The use of ourname must receive our written approval. Our letters and reports
apply only to the sample tested and/or inspected, and are not ind cat ve of the quant t e5 of apparent y identical or similar products.