Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Gulf Bearing-LR 950612
HUNTINGDON/SWL P.O. Box 224227 · 2575 Lone Star Dflve ' Dallas, Texas 75212 * 214/631-2700 Metro 263-1133 REPORT NO: 26042 CLIENT: Gulf Bearing; Inc. DATE: June 12, 1995 The tabular data is available upon request. COMBINED OVERALL VALUE RESULTS: 90% Conf. Range 90% Conf. Range PLACEMENT Ff - :' -+ FI - + 2A 51.6 48.s s~.7 57.7 49.2 a~.1 2B 41.0 37.1 44.0 63.0 48.3 2C 52.2 47.2 57.2 59.1 45.1 73.0 2D 44.2 30.9 48.4 94.6 72.3 118.0 2E 44.0 30.8 48.2 65.6 5o.1 81.1 2F 64.0 57.0 7o.t 145.0 t~l.O 178.o 2G 63.2 57.~ .0.2 84.1 e4.2 103.0 2H 39.0 35.3 42.8 82:8 63.2 102.0 COMMENTS ~uperi::0r t0 the sPecified limits. TECHNICIAN: F. Tisdale * Based upon the number of samples taken, there is a OOO/b certainty that tho actual F-Number8 of the eurface8 surveyed will fall within tho range which follow tho respective estimated Flatness and Levelness F-Numbers. SPECIFIED LIMITS : Specified Overall Value - Ff 35 Specified Overall Value - FI 24 : The Composite F-Numbers on this placement are Tim Begole, Construction Materials Engineering Division PROJECT: Gulf Bearing, Coppell, Texas CLIENT NO: 3200037 A FLOOR SURFACE ANALYSIS LOCATION SURVEYED (Cast 6/7195): Placement 2A - Slab on Grade, A.5 to D.5 1 2.7 to 3.0 Placement 2B - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 3.8 to 4.0 Placement 2C - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 4.8 to 5.0 Placement 2D - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 5.5 to 5.7 Placement 2E - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 6.3 to 6.5 Placement 2F - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 ! 7.0 to 7.2 Placement 2G - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 7.8 to 8.0 Placement 2H - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 ! 8.5 to 8.7 ASTM STANDARD : ASTM E 1155 INSTRUMENT USED : "Dipstick', manufactured by Face Technologies; Norfolk, Virginia SAMPLING METHOD : Point elevations were measured at regular 12 inch intervals along straight lines up to 19 feet in length. The elevation differences between all adjacent reading points, the arithmetic differences between all adjacent 1 2 inch elevation differences, and the elevation differences between all points separated 10 feet were then calculated. Estimates of the floor's flatness and level- ness F-Numbers (Ff &*FI) were obtained through a statistical analysis of these calculated profile values. HUNTINGDONISWL CLIENT: Gulf Bearing, Inc. PROJECT: Gulf Bearing, Coppell, Texas REPORT NO:~'26042 DATE: June 12, 1995 CLIENT NO: 3200037 A FLOOR SURFACE ANALYSIS LOCATION SURVEYED (Cast 6/7195): Placement 2A - Slab on Grade, A.5 to D.5 1 2.7 to 3.0 Placement Placement Placement Placement Placement Placement Placement 2B - Slab on Grade, 2C - Slab on Grade, 2D - Slab on Grade, 2E - Slab on Grade, 2F - Slab on Grade, 2G - Slab on Grade, 2H - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 3.8 to 4.0 A.5 to C.5 1 4.8 to 5.0 A.5 to C.5 1 5.5 to 5.7 A.5 to C.5 1 6.3 to 6.5 A.5 to C.5 1 7.0 to 7.2 A.5 to C.5 ! 7.8 to 8.0 A.5 to C.5 ! 8.5 to 8.7 APPROXIMATE AREA: 2,249 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 90% Conf. Range Survey Line Pts. Ff ..- + 2 A - I 19 70.59 so.22 go.ge 2 A - I 19 36.41 2s.go 46.82 2 A - 2 19 48.79 34.71 02.87 2 A - 3 19 55.03 3o.15 7o.81 2 A - 4 19 47.90 ~4.o? o1.~ 2 A - 5 19 50.13 3~.ge 34.so 2 A - 6 19 61.37 43.se 70.08 2 A - 7 19 71.68 so.ge 92.37 90% Conf. Range FI - + 103.99 7~.e7 134.Ol 53.48 38.04 84.63 so.2o 150.oe 38.28 27.23 46.~3 63.08 ~.87 79.92 ss.ss 45.62 32.46 38.7~ 60.80 43.23 2 B - 8 12 30.13 lo.42 4o.84 2 B - 9 12 64.75 41.72 87.78 2 B - 10 12 66.26 42.70 89.82 2 B - 11 12 43.99 28.3s 50.63 2 B - 12 12 40.86 20.33 50.30 2 B - 13 12 50.98 32.8s 2 B - 14 12 48.03 3o.9s 65.11 2 B - 15 13 32.21 2~.1e 2 B - 16 12 36.34 23.42 49.20 2 B - 17 12 45.15 29.09 61.21 2 B - 18 12 53.67 34.50 72.75 2 B - 19 12 29.81 ~o.2t 4o.41 2 B - 20 12 50.40 32.46 68.32 72.13 46.46 07.7~ 105.18 07.78 164.47 los.ge 222~e 69.91 45.05 04.77 44.32 28.50 eo.oe 97.99 &~.14 120.32 T/.~ 56.94 37.40 70.40 27.92 17,99 37.U 144.44 93.o8 292.80 l~.so 3ge..~ 47.38 3o.s3 ~4.23 79.05 so.94 .m7.1o 2 B - 21 12 37.59 24;22 so.ge 123.71 79.72 1~r.70 COMB:l:NED!~:ii!?:.:iiii!i~iii?~?i::i::?' i::ii116~ ::i~:ii:.i::::i?:?-~!!~ii :~?ii?:.::i!i!:'!~!~:'iii~:i i!i.~!~ii!i!i rll' i[ I:: ]1: I~1~1~ I ii HUNTING'DONISWL CLIENT: Gulf I~'earing, Inc. PROJECT: Gulf Bearing, Coppell,.Texas REPOR'I~'NO: 26042 DATE: June 12, 1995 CLIENT NO: 3200037 A FLOOR SURFACE ANALYSIS LOCATION SURVEYED (Cast 6/7/95): Placement 2A - Slab on Grade, A.5 to D.5 / 2.7 to 3.0 Placement 2B - Slab on Grade A.5 to C.5 i 3.8 to 4.0 Placement 2C - Slab on Grade Placement 2D - Slab on Grade PlaCement 26 - Slab on Grade Placement 2F - Slab on Grade Placement 2G - Slab on Grade Placement 2H - Slab on Grade A.5 to C.5 1 4.8 to 5.0 A.5 to C.5 1 5.5 to 5.7 A.5 to C.5 1 6.3 to 6.5 A.5 to C.5 1 7.0 to 7.2 A.5 to C.5 1 7.8 to 8.0 A.5 to C.5 ! 8.5 to 8.7 APPROXIMATE AREA: 2,249 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 90% Conf. Range Survey Line Pts. Ff - + 2 C - 22 12 52.11 ~.r~ 70.64 2 C - 23 12 52.60 33.;o 71.50 2 C - 24 12 65.27 42.06 88.4, 2 C - 25 12 47.22 3o.43 64.Ol 2 C - 26 12 63.07 4o.84 88.50 2 C - 27 12 56.20 56.22 76.18 2 C - 28 12 49.67 3=.Ol 67.33 2 C - 29 12 41.56 26.78 56.34 2 C - 30 12 63.70 41.o5 56.56 2 C - 31 12 43.20 27.34 s~.56 2 C - 32 12 43.65 28.13 ..s~.17 2 C - 33 12 64.32 ~' 41.45 87.19 2 C -. 34 12 56.57 56.~s 78.~ 2 C - 35 12 56.81 3e.61 77.Ol 90% Conf. Range FI - + 55.33 98.43 ~.4~ 42.43 27.34 29.96 lUl 4o.61 100.~ ~.~ ~.~ 118.65 76.~ ~m.~ 175.~ ~ ~=.~ ~.~ 43.29 ~ ~.~ 48.25 =~.oe ~.4~ 111.26 ~.~ ~.~ 71.65 ~.~ e~.~= 60.42 ~.~ s~.e~ 92.58 ~.~ 136.62 ~.~ 2 D - 36 12 47.66 3o.71 64.61 2 D - 37 12 55.05 35.47 74.63 2 D - 38 12 36.80 23.71 49.89 2 D - 39 12 46.56 ~o.oo e3.12 2 D - 40 12 59.41 3;.28 80.s4 2 D - 41 1.2 34.66 22.33 46.99 2 D - 42 12 27.92 17.9o 37.86 2 D - 43 12 36.45 23.49 49.41 2 D - 44 12 47.98 30.82 65.o4 2 D - 45 12 56.12 36.16 76.08 2 D - 46 12 45.47 29.30 61.~4 2 D - 47 12 88.07 5e.78 119.56 2 D - 48 12 77.08 49.87 lO4.49 2 D - 49 12 152.12 ~.o3 85.61 68.17 11e.os 162.68 104.83 183.79 118.43 249.16 58.48 ~.~ 7o.28 67.87 43.74 63.13 ~.~ 106.63 ~.71 83.09 ~.~ 112.~ 148.38 ~2 ~1.14 127.41 82.1o 1~.~ 141.77 Ol.a 1~.18 182.16 117.~ 2~.~ 44.23 28.50 s9.~e 76.70 45.4,1 1~.~-/ HUNTINGDONISWL CLIENT: Gulf B'~aring, Inc. PROJECT: Gulf Bearing, Coppell, .Texas REPOR~NO: 26042 DATE: June 12, 1995 CLIENT NO: 3200037 A FLOOR SURFACE ANALYSIS LOCATION SURVEYED (CastS/7195): Placement 2A - Slab on Grade, Placement 2B - Slab on Grade, Placement 2C - Slab on Grade, Placement 2D - Slab on Grade, Placement Placement Placement Placement A.5 to D.5 ! 2.7 to 3.0 A.5 to C.5 1 3.8 to 4.0 A.5 to C.5 1 4.8 to 5.0 A.5 to C.5 1 5.5 to 5.7 2E - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 / 6.3 to 6.5 2F.- Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 7.0 to 7.2 26 - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 7.8 to 8.0 2H - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 ! 8.5 to 8.7 APPROXIMATE AREA: 2,249 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,1 25 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 90% Conf. Range Survey Line Pts. Ff - + 2 E - 50 12 42.07 27.11 57.o3 2 E - 51 12 68.72 44.28 o3.15 2 E - 52 12 39.95 25.74 54.16 2 E - 53 12 64.52 41.58 87.40 2 E - 54 12 55.00 35.44 74.56 2 E - 55 12 44.54 28.70 00.38 2 E - 56 12 44.67 28.79 60.55 2 E - 57 12 45.47 29.3o 61.84 2 E - 58 12 66.81 43.06 oe.s7 2 E - 59 12 51.62 33.26 eo.o8 2 E - 60 12 31.16 20.08 ,42.24 2 E - 61 12 51.93 ~' 33.46 70.40 2 E -. 62 12 29.72 18.15 40.29 2 E - 63 12 40.23 25.92 54.54 90% Conf. Range FI - + 50.37 32.40 ~.28 1 83.49 118.24 246.74 43.62 28.11 5o. 13 52.15 33.el 70.50 202.62 13o.b'7 274.87 56.03 3~.11 76.50 92.90 55.55 12s.o4 74.80 46.20 lO'~.40 67.89 43.7s o2.o3 108.34 ~0.81 146.87 46.14 2e.73 ~..50 114.60 73.85 135.35 100.12 e4.r~ 135.~ 61.55 38.es .3.44 2 F - 64 12 59.54 38.37 ~0.71 2 F - 65 12 67.80 43.e~ Ol.91 2 F - 66 12 86.40 ss.ss 117.12 2 F - 67 12 93.07 59.07 126.17 2 F - 68 12 52.54 33.86 71.22 2 F - 69 12 52.82 34.04 71.6o 2 F - 70 12 48.12 31.01 65.23 2 F - 71 12 73.40 47.30 99.50 2 F - 72 12 83.66 s3.Ol 113.41 2 F - 73 12 85.26 54.~4 115.58 2 F - 74 12 72.56 48.78 98.38 2 F - 75 12 93.30 so.12 128.48 2 F - 76 12 77.42 40.89 104.95 2 F - 77 12 41.76 2O.Ol 56.61 92.22 58.~ 125.01 184.89 110.14 250.64 221.45 142.70 300.20 120.23 77.46 1~.~ 248.50 180.13 338.87 291.73 187.50 385.47 189.39 122.o4 89.1 7 67.46 120.50 355.30 228.oe 4.~.64 133.30 85.oo 18o.7o 1 1 1.89 72.10 151.68 242.46 155.24 206.78 133.2S 210.31 1 99.?8 128.74 270.32 HUNTINGDONISWL CLIENT: Gulf Bearing, Inc. PROJECT: Gulf Bearing, Coppell, Texas REPORT~NO: 26042 DATE: June 12, 1995 CLIENT NO: 3200037 A FLOOR SURFACE ANALYSIS LOCATION SURVEYED(Cast 6/7195): Placement 2A - Slab on Grade, A.5 to D.5 1 2.7 to 3.0 Placement 2B - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 / 3.8 to 4.0 Placement 2C - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 ! 4.8 to 5.0 Placement 2D - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 5.5 to 5.7 Placement 2E - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 6.3 to 6.5 Placement 2F - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 7.0 to 7.2 Placement 20 - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 7.8 to 8.0 Placement 2H - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 ! 8.5 to 8.7 APPROXIMATE AREA: 2 249 S.F. 125 S.F. 125 S.F. 125 S.F. 125 S.F. 125 S.F. 125 S.F. 125 S.F. 90% Conf. Range Survey Line Pts. Ff - + 2 G - 78 12 64.05 41.27 ~.83 2 G - 79 12 59.27 38.~9 8o.=s 2 G - 80 12 61.67 ~.74 83.83 2 G - 81 12 104.33 07.23 141.43 2 G - 82 12 45.00 29.00 61.oo 2 G - 83 12 52.19 33.83 7o.76 2 G - 84 12 132.91 86.83 1~o.17 2 G - 85 12 54.70 ss.2s 74.15 2 G - 86 12 119.03 76.70 16t.38 2 G - 87 12 59.16 38.12 ~o.20 2 G - 88 12 66.03 42.65 .~9.$1 2 G - 89 12 59.67 38.45 80.89 2 G -. 90 12 59.36 38.26 80.47 2 G - 91 12 67.70 43.63 91.77 90% Conf. Range FI - + 71.04 45.7~ 00.~) 74.66 43.11 lol.21 74.61 48.0~ 101.14 1 09.1 4 70.33 147.00 70.86 4s.00 00.~ 166.61 107.~ ~5.~ 337.89 217.74 ~.~ 318.81 ~s.~ ~.~, 94.29 ~.7, ~27.~" 109.45 7o.~ ~.~ 73.19 47.~e ~.= 58.74 37.85 ~., 69.16 ~.~ ~.~ 75.72 ~.~ ~o~.~ 2 H - 92 12 40.34 26.00 54.68 2 H - 93 12 29.63 ~9.oo 4o.17 2 H - 94 12 18.22 11.74 24.70 2 H - 95 12 54.23 =4.96 73.51 2 H ' §6 12 52.23 ~.ee ?o.~o 2 H - 97 12 64.79 41.75 87.83 2 H - 98 12 58.13 37.46 78.80 2 H - 99 12 51.97 33.49 7o.45 2 H - 100 12 53.05 =4.19 71.91 2 H - 101 12 51.78 33.37 7o.19 2 H - 102 12 25.61 16.5o 34.72 2 H - 103 12 76.08 40.03 103.13 2 H - 104 12 87.23 56.21 118.25 2 H - 105 12 66.55 42.68 ~o.22 285.36 183.8o 38e.33 75.87 4~.80 ~o~,.as 1 50.42 ..93 203.91 72.34 46.~ ,.o~ 47.77 ~o.7~ ~.~ 56.65 ~.61 7e.7o 59.25 38.18 80.32 73.89 47.81 100.17 73.67 47.47 00.87 222.23 143-21 3o1.~s 294.32 160.00 300., 1 38.23 8o.o8 187.3o 98.60 83.54 133.00 101.19 es.21 I~7.17 HUNTINGDONISWL CLIENT: Gulf 8~aring, Inc. PROJECT: Gulf Bearing, Coppell,.Texas A FLOOR SURFACE ANALYSIS LOCATION SURVEYED (Cast' 6/7195): Placement 2A - Slab on Grade, A.5 to D.5 1 2.7 to 3.0 Placement 2B - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 3.8 to 4.0 Placement 2C - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 / 4.8 to 5.0 Placement 2D - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 5.5 to 5.7 Placement 2E - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 1 6.3 to 6.5 Placement 2F - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 / 7.0 to 7.2 Placement 2G - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.5 / 7.8 to 8.0 Placement 2H - Slab on Grade, A.5 to C.51 8.5 to 8.7 90% Conf. Range REPORT NO: 26042 DATE: June 12, 1995 CLIENT NO: 3200037 APPROXIMATE AREA: 2,249 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 1,125 S.F. 90% Conf. Range Survey Une Pts. Ff - + I FI - + * Based upon the number of samples taken, there is a 90% certainty that the actual F-Numbers of the surfaces ~uweyed will fail within the ranges which lollow the respective estimated Flatness and Levelness F-Numbers.