Loading...
Lake Park-CS 900924 GINN, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 51990 Ms. S shmand, P.E. ~ ~. City of Coppell P.O. Box 478 Coppell, Texas 75019 Re: Lake Park Addition - Drainage System (Proposed) Dear Ms. Daneshmand: We have reviewed the revised engineering plans for the Lake Park Addition as per your request of September 20, 1990. With the exception of the Drainage Plans and the dedication of a larger utility easement for the sanitary sewer between Lots 7 and 8 of Block A, it appears that all of our previous comments have been addressed in a satisfactory manner. For your convenience we have marked the Final Plat and plans with our comments and are transmitting them and a set of the previous comments herewith. Before getting into the drainage issues we feel it prudent to mention that since an area of wetlands has been located on the project site, outside of the lake, the developer should be required to show the location of these wetlands on the plans and indicate his intentions regarding construction in that area. After review of the September 10, 1990 letter from the Army Corps of Engineers, it is clear that a 404 permit will be required prior to construction which would effect the area of wetlands found on the project site. We suggest that you require the developer to satisfactorily address the onsite wetlands (not to be confused with the lake) before you issue any construction permit5 Also, under the unusual situation that exists with the Floodplain/Floodway status of this project, the developer should be required to provide the City with a letter of indemnification, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, which will hold the City of Coppell harmless from any damages or actions arising from the developer's or his contractor's activities in the floodplain associated with this project. I believe that this approach has been used in the past on a couple of projects. With regard to the main purpose of this review, the proposed storm drainage system, we have performed a cursory review of the system and determined the areas of street flooding which may occur during the 100 year storm rainfall event. Please be aware that the drainage plans as submitted, are based on a 25 year storm and are acceptable under the Subdivision Ordinance No. 185. 17103 Preston Road · Suite 100 · LB 118 · Dallas, Texas 75248 · Phone 214/248-4900 Based on our review of the Drainage Plans, sheets 1,2 and 3 of 3 sheets, we have plotted areas of ponding on Paving Plan sheets 1,2,4 and 5 of 7 sheets, transmitted herewith. The Hydraulic Gradients we have calculated for the drainage system backwater elevations, representing the ponding in the streets, are marked on sheets 2 and 3 of the Drainage Plans transmitted herewith. The best indication of where ponding may occur during th 100 year storm event is marked on sheets 1 and 2 of the Site Grading Plans transmitted herewith. As you can see, the only lots in the subdivision which would have any accessibility problems during the 100 year storm are Lots 13, 14, 15, 22 and 23 of Block E on Briar Cove Drive. We have performed some cursory calculations based on increasing the pipe sizes proposed for storm sewer lines "B","C" and "D", ~-hich indicate that the &tree~ flooding may be ~reatiy reduced or eliminated. In our calculations, we have used a 100 year storm water surface elevation of 454.16, furnished by Kimley-Horn and Associates, representing the 100 year storm with ultimate development discharges for Denton Creek adjacent to the site. We received this information during our initial review of the subdivision, prior to the completion of the Albert H. Halff and Associates study. We have never received or reviewed the Halff Associates study and therefore have no knowledge of the water surface elevations they have calculated adjacent to this site. The revised Hydraulic Gradients, larger pipe sizes, and slopes for storm sewer lines "B", "C" and "D" are marked on sheets 2 and 3 of the Drainage Plans. Increasing the size of the storm sewer pipes appears the most economical way of reducing or eliminating the street flooding during the 100 year storm. Before proceeding with such a plan, the project design engineer should be consulted and allowed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed changes. With the larger diameter pipes we've suggested there may be some problems with depth of cover or conflict with other underground utilities. Please call me if you have further questions. Sincerely, John C. Karlsruher, P.E. Senior Engineer cc: H. Wayne Ginn, P.E. File 90441