Freeport NIP(7.2)-LR001026 TSIT
2502 Gravel Drive - Ft. Worth, TX 76118
817-589-9933
Date: October 26, 2000
Report of Built- Up Roof Inspection
PROJECT: Freeport Building V
Coppe11, TX
GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Hill & Wilkenson
800 Klien Rd. Suite 100 - Piano, TX 75074 -'
CONTACT: Mike Worley 214-299-4300 Mob. 214-914-7854
- ROOFING CONTRACTOR: Pinks~on Hollar
2887 A W. Pioneer Pkwy. - Arlington, TX
ROOFING FORF_~MAN: Scott Lock~'ood Mob. 817-401-0809
~~ACTOKER: Tarnko System - T,vl~ III Asphalt - 4 Ply with aggregate ballast
Technical Information
WEATHER CONDITIONS: Pt Cloudy AMBIENT TEMPERATURES: 71 to 80
FORECAST FOR NEXT DAY: Same
SIZE OF CREW 10 TIME: NA
ROOFING MATERIALS RECEIVED? No LABELS ATTACHED? Yes
MATERIALS STORED AS REQUIRED? Yes MATERIALS REJECTED? No
NOTE: **Specialty Products Asphalt- Wynnewood, OK - Generic Labeling
SPECIFIED TEMPERATURES: (Asphalt)
Kettle: 500 + 25 degrees F. EVT (Application): 450 +25 degrees F.
Kettle: 10:15 am - 520 EVT: 10:45 am - 480
DECK INSPECTED? NA
CRICKETS INSTALLED? No Location: NA
AREA OF ROOF APPLICATION: North east corner was completed, building "dried in"
Number of SQ's (SF X 100) placed this date: NA surfacing
Was placement per specifications: Yes
OPERATIONS INSPECTED: Inspection this date at the above referenced project revealed
Surfacing on the north roof sections. Application was as required with hot asphalt applied
to the completed membrane and aggregate immediately applied. Embeddment was
considered good with approximately 75% of the aggregate applied fully embedded.
Some areas will require brooming to cover exposed asphalt.
Patching and detail work was on-going on the two south roof sections. The roof area was
dean and free of debris. '
The expansion joint had not yet been fried with the vapor barrier or insulation.
Technician: I. Halverson/Williams Time: 4 hours
Chad McEntee
TSIT
2502 Gravel Drive - Ft. Worth, TX 76118
817-589-9933
Date: December 5, 2000
Report of Built-Up Roof Inspection
PROJECT: Freeport Building V
Coppell, TX
GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Hill & Wilkenson
800 Klien Rd. Suite 100 -Plano, TX 75074
CONTACT: Mike Worley 214-299-4300 Mob. 214-914-7854
ROOFING CONTRACTOR: Pinkston-H~o'llar
2887 A W. Pioneer Pkwy.. - Arlington, 3=X---
ROOFING FOREMAN: Scott Lockwood Mob. 817-401-0809
MANUFACTORER: Tamko System - T,vpe III Asphalt - 4 ply with aggregate ballast'-
Punch List
On this date a representative for Reed Enginee. ring was on site to examine the
completed roof at the above referenced project. The following items were noted for
correction:
1. No counterflashing on the south and half of west parapet walls. COMPLETED
2. No indication of the additional fasteners requested on the top edge of the parapet
base flashing. On the last inspection the foreman was advised that nailing off the
base flashing 2 to 3 feet oc, was unacceptable. The counter flashing has been
attached and no additional fasteners were evident. ADDITIONAL
FASTENERS WERE CONSIDERED THOSE USED TO ATTACH
COUNTERFLASHING. NOT PER SPECIFICATIONS
3. No caulk on thc lip of counterflashing that is in-place. COMPLETED
4. Several incomplete corners (inside and outside) of counterflashing on thc
parapets. CAULKED
5. Additionally at some corners large gaps were noted that con not be filled with
caulk alone. Backer rods should be utilized. COULD NOT VERIFY
PLACEMENT OF BACKER RODS - CAULKED
6. No tie in of the counterflashing at all ends of expansion joints. COMPLETED
7. The far north expansion joint cap tacked down and not nailed off properly.
COMPLETED
8. On the south side of the center expansion joint the parapet base flashing is
separated from the wall. This is a water ent~ area, and the base flashing was not
properly nailed off to prevent this occurrence. TACKED DOWN -
COVERED WITH COUNTERFLASHING - COMPLETED
PUNCH LIST (continued):
9. The two middle roof section are light of aggregate. There is sufficient embedded
aggregate, not enough loose aggregate to cover asphak. No additional
aggregate added. Embedded surfacing good, little to no loose aggregate.
Technician: Iacque HalversonFvVilliams, RRO Time: 4 hours
TSIT
TSIT
2502 Gravel Drive - Ft. Worth, TX 76118 817-589-9933
December 6, 2000
Arthur Etherly
Reed Engineering
2424 Stutz Drive Suite 400
Dallas, TX 75235
Completion Letter
'RE: Freeport V - Coppell, TX
Dear Mr. Ehterly:
In accordance with your request, a representative of T.S.I.T. performed a visual
roof inspection on the completed, above referenced project on December 5,
2000.
Based on this review, the results represented by visual observation and reports
indicate that the in-place BUR complies with the project plans and
specifications or were reported to others for review.
Additionally, based on this review and the final walk-over performed this date
the quality of workmanship for this project was considered to be "fair''~ .
Sincerely,
Jacque Halverson/Willliams, RRO
Senior Roof Consultant - (T.S.I.T.)
I Items noted as incomplete or not per specifications may or may not be accepted by the manufacturer
holding the warranty on the project. These items have been previously reported as not in compliance.
TSIT
Freeport V & VI
Coppell, Texas
ROOF MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
Roof maintenance should be performed on a bi-annual basis or following any large
storms which may effect the performance of the system.
Protecting the system will extend the life of the system. The following are
recommendations to insure the maximum quality of the roofing system.
1. Notify roofing contractor immediately after a roof leak occurs. If possible, note
conditions resulting in leakage. Heavy or light rain, wind direction, temperature, time
of the year that leak occurs are all important clues in tracking leak area. Note
whether the leak stops shortly after rain or continues until the roof is dry.
2. Set up a regular maintenance schedule and document all parties on roof and any
maintenance items which required attention.
3. Do not allow foot traffic on the system during extreme cold or very hot weather as
this can damage the system. Do not allow installation of any mechanical equipment
or additional penetrations without ~rst contacting the roofing contractor. This could
void the manufacturer's warranty. Allow only authorized personnel on the roof.
4. In emergency situations, roof cement may be used to patch leak areas to prevent or
minimize property loss.
5. Contact your roofing professional on a yearly basis for a complete and professional
annual maintenance check:
MAINTENANCE CHECK LIST:
Remove all debris from roof surface.
Check drains and drain cages, remove all collected debris from around
drain area and from drain cages to insure proper drainage at all times.
Check for ponding water. Ponding water is considered to be water
which sets in one location for longer than 48 horn's with no apparent ..
drainage.' .....
Check around all rooftop equipment which require maintenance for
damages.
Check flashing areas at perimeter and curbs for damages - split seams
especially in areas that sustain high winds and/or foot traffic.
Check and repair deteriorated caulk (i.e., equipment stands~ roof
dividers, expansion joints, top edge of the counterflashing).
Check for loose or wind damaged counterflashing or coping, especially
after heavy wind conditions.
Examine annually coping joints for caulk deterioration.
Have a Roofing Professional examine the roof every 1 to 2 years to
detect the onset of any abnormal conditions.
Prepared by T. Smith Inspection and Testing Services