Loading...
Freeport NIP(7.4)-LR001221 GEOTECHN CAL AND E N ',t I R O ",i i~ E ",1 T A L CONSULTANTS December 21, 2000 Project No. 6542 ~'~ Report No. 128 Duke-Weeks Realty Corporation 5495 Beltline Road, Suite 360 Dallas, Texas 75240 ATTN: Mr. Paul Brown Re: Built-Up Roof Inspection Freeport VI Royal Lane and Creekview Coppell, Texas Gentlemen: Transmitted here are the results of the built-up roof inspection performed at the referenced site for Reed Engineering Group, Inc. from December 5, 2000, by TSIT. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, REED ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. Original Signed By James F. Phipps, P.E. JFP/mm copies submitted: (1) Duke-Weeks Realty Corporation/Mr. Paul Brown (1) Hardy McCullah/MLM Architects,qVlr. Norman Coates (1) TMBP - Consulting Engineers/Mr. Frank Merritt (1) Pacheco Koch/Mr. Jim Koch (1) Hill & Wilkinson, Inc./Mr. Steve Camp (1) City of Coppell/Mr. Lee Stone or Mr. Larry Davis 2424 STUTZ DR.- SUITE 400. DALLAS. TX 75235 · -;. [214] 350 5600 · =AX [214] 350 0019 TSIT 2502 Gravel Drive - Ft. Worth, TX 76118 817-589-9933 Date: December 5, 2000 Report of Bu il t- Up Roof Inspection PROJECT: Freeport Building VI ppcn, TX GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Hill & Wilkenson 800 Klien Rd. Suite 100 - Piano, TX 75074 CONTACT: Mike Worley 214-299-4300 Mob. 214-914-7854 ROOFING CONTRACTOR: Pinkston Hollar 2887 A W. Pioneer Pkwy. ~ Arlington, TX ROOFING FORFaMA&N: Scott Lockwood Mob. 817-401-0809 MANUFACTORER: Tamko S,vstem - Type III Asphalt - 4 ply with aggregate ballast Punch List On this date a representative for Reed Engineering was on site to examine the completed roof at the above referenced project. The following items were noted for correction: 1. Scupper details were incomplete, completed 2. Excessive debris over the entire system, from several trades, complete 3. Pitchpans need to be over filled and sloped to sides to promote proper drainage. completed 4. Caulk in the panel seams is separating. Incomplete - not roofers responsibility 5. Drain cages were not set, some drains will need to be cleaned free of asphalt to accomplish this. complete 6. Several pipe penetrations and pitchpans were set on the completed roof and flashed with roof cement, rather than the required roof plies and/or modified SBS with hot asphalt, completed 7. At the north expansion joint, north side, the aggregate application is thin and the aggregate in place is covered with asphalt. This area will require additional loose aggregate. No additional a§gregate added. Embedded surfacing good, little to no loose a§gre§ate. 8. At the north expansion joint, south side on west wall, parallel to the second scupper there is a gas leak in the pipe joint, a constant hissing sound was heard. completed 9. Several scupper on both sides of the building arc considered Iow. This is evident in that the water is draining through the scuppers instead of the drains. Thc water has discolored the exterior wall. It is recommended that dams (gravel guards) bc placed in front of the scuppers to divert the water to thc drains. A detail is attached with this report, completed Technician: 1. Halverson/Williams, tt3t, O Time: 4 hours TSIT 2502 Gravel Drive - Ft. Worth, TX 76118 817-589-9933 December 6, 2000 Arthur Etherly Reed Engineering 2424 Stutz Drive Suite 400 Dallas, TX 75235 Completion Letter .' RE: Freeport VI - Coppell, TX Dear Mr. Ehterly: In accordance with your request, a representative of T.S.I.T. performed a visual roof inspection on the completed, above referenced project on December 5, 2000. Based on this review, the results represented by visual observation and reports indicate that the in-place BUR complies with the project plans and specifications or were reported to others for review. Additionally, based on this review and the final walk-over performed this date the quality of workmanship for this project was considered to be "fair''~ . Sincerely, ~on/Willliams, RRO Senior Roof Consultant - (T.S.I.T.) I Items noted as incomplete or not per specifications may or may not be accepted by the manufacturer holding the warranty on the project. These items have been previously reported as not in compliance. TSIT Freeport V & VI Coppell, Texas ROOF MAINTENANCE PROGRAM Roof maintenance should be performed on a bi-annual basis or following any large storms which may effect the performance of the system. Protecting the system will extend the life of the system. The following are recommendations to insure the maximum quality of the roofing system. 1. Notify roofing contractor immediately after a roof leak occurs. If possible, note conditions resulting in leakage. Heavy or light rain, wind direction, temperature, time of the year that leak occurs are all important clues in tracking leak area. Note whether the leak stops shortly after rain or continues until the roof is dry. 2. Set up a regular maintenance schedule and document all parties on roof and any maintenance items which required attention. 3. Do not allow foot traffic on the system during extreme cold or very hot weather as this can damage the system. Do not allow- installation of any mechanical equipment or additional penetrations without first contacting the roofing contractor. This could void the manufacturer's warranty. Allow only authorized personnel on the roof. 4. In emergency situations, roof cement may be used to patch leak areas to prevent or minimize property loss. 5. Contact your roofing professional on a yearly basis for a complete and professional annual maintenance check. MAINTENANCE CHECK LIST: Remove all debris from roof surface. Check drains and drain cages, remove all collected debris from around drain area and from drain cages to insure proper drainage at all times. Check for ponding water. Ponding water is considered to be water which sets in one location for longer than 48 hours with no apparent drainage. Check around all roof top equipment which require maintenance for damages. Check flashing areas at perimeter and curbs for damages - split seams especially in areas that sustain high winds and/or foot traffic. Check and repair deteriorated caulk (i.e., equipment stands, roof dividers, expansion joints, top edge of the counterflashing). Check for loose or wind damaged counterflashing or coping, especially after heavy wind conditions. Examine annually coping joints for caulk deterioration. Have a Roofing Professional examine the roof every 1 to 2 years to detect the onset of any abnormal conditions. Prepared by T. Smith Inspection and Testing Services