Gateway BP(1.3)-CS 991012The City With A Beautiful Future
RO. BOX 478
COPPELL, TEXAS 75019
McCann III
Catellus Development Corporation
4545 Fuller Drive, Suite 100
Irving, Texas 75038
-FILE
RO. Box 478
Coppell, Texas 75019
972-462-0022
October 12, 1999
RE:iRevised Impact fees for G~teway Business Park Block 1, Lot 2 and Common Area
Dear Mr. McCann:
In December, 1988 the City of Coppell assessed impact fees for the referenced project. At that
time, it was the City's understanding that the use would be primarily for warehouse. Thus, the
development was assessed roadway impact fees as a General Light Industrial development. The
resulting roadway impact fee for the 150,017 square feet development was $11,926.35, including
a -?5% roadway impact fee credit. This fee has already been paid per the requirements of the
Subdivision Ordinance.
It has recently come to our attention (see attached memorandum) that 35,058 square feet of this
development will be finished out for Comspace and 60,900 square feet will be finished out for
Quality Fabrications. Again, this space was assessed as a light industrial use in its entirety.
However, Comspace intends to use 22,886 square feet as office space and Quality Fabrications
plans to use 6,476 square feet as office. The change in proposed use to office space results in an
increase in roadway impact fees required for this development.
The difference in t~e impact fees required and those already paid is simply the change due to
using 29,362 (22,886 + 6476) square feet as office. As illustrated below, and detailed in the
attached roadway impact fee calculations, the difference is calculated as:
$8786.58 (office) - $2334.28 (light industriaO = $6452.30 (required)
Please make payment to the City of Coppell in this amount and forward to the Finance
Department along with a copy of the roadway impact fee assessment table. If you have any
questions, please contact me at (972)304-3679.
Sincerely,
Michael A. Martin, P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
CC:
Jennifer Armstrong, Finance Director
Doug Stevens, Engineering Technician
Glenn Hollowell, Assistant Director of Public Works
Greg Jones, Chief Building Official
Gary Sims, Director of Leisure Services
ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
PROJECT:
DATE:
OFFICE USE
Service Area *
Gateway Business Park, Block 1, Lot 2 & Common Area 1
10/12/1999
Category **
Land Use **
Building Area (sf)
Development Units **
Vehicle Miles per Development Unit **
Fee per Vehicle Mile ***
Roadway Impact Fee due = (Development Units x
9
Office
General Office Bldg.
29,362
29.36
3.99
$300
(Vehicle Miles per Development Unit) x (Fee per Vehicle Mile) = $35,146.31
* (Figure 2 - Roadway Impact Fee Study)
** (Table 3 - Roadway Impact Fee Study)
*** (Schedule 2, Page 3 - Roadway Impact Fee Study)
Percent of Credit Toward Roadway Impact Fees 75 %
Total Credit $26,359.74
......... :":": ============================ "":" ":"":" ' ' ': ........ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::~::'::::~" '": "' '" iS"'"
I ~ ~ ~ ...................... ~.::;:::~~ ~ ......................... ~ +~' '~ ........................................... i~I,'~
INDUSTRIAL USE
;ervice Area *
Category **
Land Use **
Building Area (sf)
Development Units ** -,
Vehicle Miles per Development Unit **
Fee per Vehicle Mile ***
Roadway Impact Fee due = (Development Units x
9
Industrial
General Light Industrial
29,362
29.36
1.06
$300
(Vehicle Miles per Development Unit) x (Fee per Vehicle Mile) = $.9,337.12
* (Figure 2 - Roadway Impact Fee Study)
** (Table 3 - Roadway Impact Fee Study)
*** (Schedule 2, Page 3 - Roadway Impact Fee Study)
Percent of Credit Toward Roadway Impact Fees 75 %
Total Credit $7,002.84
====================================== ...... .. ':. ~.`...`..:~:i:i:i:i:~:~:?~!~:i:.~`~:~i.`...:?:k....:.~?~..:i~.~;:!ii:~.;i.:i~..`..~.~i:.C ' ~?":i ':,,'~:i
Note: This revision only covers the space to be
finished out for Comspace and Quality Fabrications
October $, 1999
MEMO
To: Mike Martin, En~neering
From: Gre~ Jones, Chief Building
I am currently reviewing two interior finish outs for Cattellus st 955 Freeport Pkwy.
Tli:e original site review, I believe projected a 3% office/97% warehouse use ratio.
Quality Fabrications is now proposing 6476 s~f- office finish OUt in 60900 ~f- of space
and Comspace is proposing 22,886 s.f- of office finish out in 35,058 s.f- of space.
Since these office ratios exceed the ori~nal proposed, I wonder if your ira?act fees
require adjustment.
Please advise since there will be at least one other tenant that will locate here with an
increased office ~tio as well