Loading...
Gateway BP(1.1)-CS 920312 NICHOLS. JACKSON. KIRK & DILLARD ''~'''' · · -~ '-z ~ -~d- (Formerly Sallinger, Nichols. Jackson. Kirk & Dillard) l ~'~ -: ;' Attorneys & Counselors at Law ~c-~-~- ~ -.~-~ .!.~ T'~W~ENCEK'~ W O^CKSON 1800 Lincoln Plaza ~E-E~ s~. -~ ~:. qos~q* c ~:c~: .., 500 X. Akard ~o.[ql D H[--~ql__ Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 954-3333 J~N ~css~-b _oo,s-' e'~',,c.c~s-' Facsimile (214) 954-3334 ~.i.~ ~ o= CC~SE~ .... ~r. Alan Ratl~ff City Manager Coppell, Texas FAX NO. 393-0948 Nu~er of Pages: 2 Re: Catellus Development Co~oration (Gateway Project) Dear Mr. Ratliff: Section 26-3 i(A) of the zoning ordinance establishes a minimum front yard for the light industrial district of 30 feet where there is no front yard parking. Section 26-4 states that "no parking shall be allowed within thirty (30) feet of the front property line." Catellus wishes to make application to the Board of Adjustment for a variance which will pe~it parking within 15 feet of the front property line on property where the front yard setback would be 30 feet. Your ~estion to me is whether or not Section 41 (4) of the Zoning Ordinance will prohibit the Board of Adjustment from hearing a re~est for variance in view o~ the fact that there is a pending replat of the property which will not be acted upon prior to the hearing before the Board on the variance re~est. It is my opinion that the Board of Adjustment may hear the re~est for variance prior to action on the replat. The first paragraph of Section 41 (4) of the Zoning Ordinance provides in effect that administrative procedures of the Zoning Ordinance with regard to Concept Plans, Detail Site Plans Preliminary Plats and Final Plats must be exhausted prior to re~esting a variance. I find no administrative procedure red,red by the zoning or4inanoe concerning the replating of property. Such procedure is found in the Subdivision Ordinance. This paragraph, to the extent it mentions Preliminary Plats Oiil61NAL OF DOCUMENT SENT BY FAX and Final Plats, serves no legal purpose and probably should be changed the next time we amend the zoning ordinance. Very truly yours, NICHOLS, JACKSON, KIRK & DILLARD