Latter-day-CS 930520 CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE #: S-1066
(The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Additi~
P & Z HEARING DATE: May 20, 1993
C. C. HEARING DATE: June 8, 1993
LOCATION:
Fronting on the west side of MacArthur Boulevard,
Boulevard.
SIZE OF AREA: 3.527 Acres.
REQUEST:
Special use request for a church.
APPLICANT:
The Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter Day Saints
61 East lq. Temple Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84150
John R. Horton
P.O. Box 1537
Ft. Worth, Tex
(817) 534-0222
HISTORY:
There has been no recent zoning history on this tra~
TRANSPORTATIOIq:
MacArthur Boulevard is an improved P6D major t
divided street contained within 110 feet of right-of-
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
Iqorth - single-family residential - SF-0
South - single-family residential - SF-9
East developing single-family residential - SF-~
West - single-family residential - SF-0
ITEM
~n)
southeast of Samuel
Architect
:t.
~oroughfare, six-lane
way.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan shows low density single-fart
this parcel.
ANALYSIS:
Because churches are identified as being compatible
land use, this proposal meets the objective of our Cc
A close look at the site plan reflects the appropriate br.
adequate yard dimensions, and landscaping which a
criteria of the Streetscape Plan.
Our major development concern with this request rela
circulation, and patterns of traffic generation. We
that this church work with the Coppell Independent
land owner adjacent on the west - to provide vehict
site to Samuel Boulevard, probably parallel to the exi.~
have concerns relative to where MacArthur Boulev:
provided, the potential need for a deceleration lane,
alignments with existing median openings. Because
Waffle study which will satisfactorily address these issu
Other issues regarding drainage easements, fh'e hy,
water and sanitary sewer issues will be addressed at ,,
Suffice it to say here that these concerns must be sari
at platting.
If we receive satisfactory answers to our traffic-relate
above, (we understand the applicant has hired a traffic
these issues), and the site plan, landscaping, sc
circulation, and aesthetic concerns are satisfactorily.
would be in order. In that the traffic study has not ye
staff review, we will leave judgements regarding all~
in limbo until a thorough analysis of the traffic data h
- hopefully, before the public hearing.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Approve the zoning request
2) Deny the zoning request
3) Modify the zoning request
ATrACHMENTS:
s1066.stf
1) SUP Site Plan
2) Rendering
ily development on
with single-family
~mprehensive Plan.
.ok screening walls,
~pears to meet the
es to traffic access,
a'ongly recommend
ehool District - the
ar access from this
ting alley. We also
trd access is to be
and concerns about
Df these concerns, a
es is recommended.
trant requirements,
,ubdivision platting.
ffactorily addressed
d concerns outlined
engineer to address
:reening provision,
iddressed, approval
t been submitted for
xaffic related issues
as been completed -