Lauren Estates-CS 990318 (2)CASE NO.:
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
PD-169R, LAUREN ESTA
P & Z HEARING DATE:
C.C. HEARING DATE:
March 18, 1999
April 13, 1999
LOCATION:
Along the west side of Moore Road, approxima
of Sandy Lake Road.
SIZE OF AREA:
Approximately 1.5 acres of property.
CURRENT ZONING:
PD-SF-7 (Planned Development, Single-Family~
REQUEST:
Amend the development conditions from 3 lots t~
APPLICANT:
Developer:
Dewayne Randle
4012 Hackmore Loop
Irving TX 75061
972-438-9200
Fax 972-579-0734
HISTORY:
The property was platted as Lot 1 of Harrisot
1977. The zoning on the property has been
years. In February, City Council approved a ti
on the subject property. Since that time, the o~
re-plat this parcel into two lots.
TRANSPORTATION:
Moore Road is a C2U two-lane undivided co11¢
standard within a 60'-wide right-of-way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North- Stringfellow Addition; SF-12
South - Single-family residential; SF-12
East - Northlake Woodlands East Phase 2; PD-SF-7
West - Harrison Addition No. I; SF-12
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan shows the prot
Iow density residential uses.
Item # 8
YES
tely 680 feet south
Estates No. H in
F-12 for over 14
ree-lot subdivision
~er has elected to
ctor constructed to
erty as suitable for
DISCUSSION:
As indicated under the History Section, this
replatting the three lots granted by Council last
today. The explanation given by the applicant
buyer ready to purchase one-half of this pr(
redeveloped into the two lots. We supp{
subdivision, and there is no reason why we can
into two lots. One troubling aspect of this subn
the site plan shows a 16-foot access easement
508-foot length of this property. We do x
easement is required, and to date, the applican!
clear-cut reason for its inclusion on the replal
conditions for approval, which need to be clearl
of the PD application. Those conditions are
With inclusion of these conditions, this a
positive consideration.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSI(
The planning staff recommends approval of the
following conditions being placed on the face of
1. All drives shall be privately owned/n
2. Optional security gates shall be
property owners
3. Private drives shall be accessible by,
4. All private drives acting as fu
constructed of 6 inch concrete with
centers on 6 inch sand base
5. No buildings or structures shall be
1R and 2R until plans for sam~
submitted to and approved by
Architect. The architect shall revi
days of receipt. If plans have not b{
7 days, plans shall be conside~
accepted.
6. Opticom gates with knox box over r
if security gates are constructed.
In addition, as mentioned above, the applicant
purpose of the 16-foot easement, acknowled
fee/lot.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Site Plan
Item # 8
proposal requests
month into two lots
was that there is a
,perty if it can be
~rted the three-lot
not support a replat
fittal is the fact that
nmning the entire
lot know why the
has not given us a
· There are other
y stated on the face
~pelled out below.
~plication warrants
N:
PD, subject to the
the PD plan:
laintained
accessible to all
dl property owners
e lanes shall be
~3 rebar on 24-inch
constructed on lots
: shall have been
Dewayne Randle,
ew plans within 7
en reviewed within
'ed approved and
~de will be required
~eeds to explain the
the $1285 park