Lauren Estates-CS 980416 crrY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO.: PD-169. LAUREN ESTA
P & Z HEARING DATE:
C.C. HEARING DATE:
April 16, 1998
May 12, 1998
LOCATION:
Along the west side of Moore Road, appr,
south of Sandy Lake Road.
SIZE OF AREA:
Approximately 2 acres (3 residential lots).
CURRENT ZONING:
SF-12 (Single Family-12).
REQUEST:
APPLICANT:
Zoning change to PD-SF-7 (Planned Developn
7).
Developer:
Dewayne Randle
4012 Haclcmore Loop
Irving TX 75061
972438-9200
Fax 972-579-0734
HISTORY:
The property was platted as Lot 1 of Harrisc
1977. The zoning on the property has been
years.
TRANSPORTATION:
Moore Road is a C2U two-lane undivided coil
standard within a 60'-wide right-of-way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North-
South -
East-
West -
Stringfellow Addition; SF-12
Single-family residential; SF-12
Northlake Woodlands East Phase 2; PD-SF-7
Harrison Addition No. I; SF-12
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan shows the pfc
low density residential uses.
Item # 6
)ximately 680 feet
tent, Single Family-
n Estates No. II in
SF-12 for over 14
ector constructed to
~xty as suitable for
DISCUSSION:
This proposal is an unusual and innovative sol~
of a relatively narrow small-acreage tract into
of which is over 21,000 square feet in area.
front Moore Drive cornply with SF-7 developr
3, which comprises less than 3:5 % of the tota
from SF-7 development standards. Its sial,
reduced to 5 feet and its access to a public str(
driveway easement. This is within the gu
Planned Development District.
Issues concerning exact firelane radii, site dn
have yet to be resolved totally. However,
addressed during the platting process.
The issue which the planning staff finds mo:
request for a Special Use Permit for stucco ma
designs were such that the project would gte
use of brick, the planning staff would be more
However, staff believes that the fight choice
mortaring technique and/or a surface treaunen
yield an entirely satisfactory Mediterranean al
that is the style that is sought.
Staff believes that stucco construction by Spec
was established for the purpose of scrutinizj~
Each applicant should provide strong jusfifical
case cost-cutting does not appear to be the mo
would be prudent to reserve judgment on the
as final design of at least one of the homes has
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSI(
The planning staff recommends denial of the I
Use Permit for stucco type construction and
Planned Development District subject to the
being corrected as follows:
Provision of inside firelane radii a miniruum of
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a late
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Site Plan
Item # 6
tion to development
3 lots, the smallest
The two lots which
lent standards. Lot
property, deviates
yards have been
;t is via a 24'-wide
[defines of the PD
tin,age and the like,
hese details can be
problematic is the
erials. If the home
~ly suffer from the
favorably inclined.
of brick, the right
of the brick could
~earance, if indeed
iai Use Permit only
l§ its use closely.
ion. While in this
tlvafion, we think it
ssue until such time
~en completed.
equest for a Special
approval of the PD
site plan submitted
30' in length.
date.