MacPlaza 1 Sun-CS 960215 (2)CASE:
CITY OP COPPEI~
PLANNING DIIPARTMENT
~FAFF REPORT
MneARTHUR PLAZA. PRRLVMIN~
P & Z HEARING DATE: February 15,
C.C. HEARING DATE: March 12, 1996
LOCATION:
SIZE OF AREA:
Total sit~ are~: 6.907
ZONING:
c (Comme~ial)
Approval of the preliminary plat
APPLICANT:
CED Construction, Inc.
s445 Fre~,n PkU, Su~.
Irving, TX 75063
(214) 929-7127
Nath~ D. Maier Cons
Dallas, TX 75231
(214) 739-4741
HISTORY:
Family Regdmtial to "O' Office. A lawsuit remdted. In
settlement agreement not yet apppoved by the eou~t, ~ (I
zoning to "C" Commercial in late 1995. There has been
TRANSPORTATION:
1 lO'-wide ri~ht-of-way shown on the thorou
6-lane divided thorou~.
Itnn# 14
kRY PLAT
~ay, Sic. ~
from 'MF-2" Multi-
~ with a
orou~ ~ in a
thfare plan as a P6D,
SURRO~ING LAND USE & ZONIN0:
Northw~t -
South -
East-
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
DISCUSSION:
TU Electric Ir~mmission line r.o.w.
vacant; "C" Commerdal
Jefferson al Rivewhsse Apamnents; "MF-2"
The 198'7 Comprehensive Plan shows
This property is subject to a declaration of covm
restrictions for Rivewhase. The document stipula~
Multi-Family
rots, conditiom and
that:
n be ~nni~ i~
a ~ plan approved by the A
Comrmttee will be required;
~ ouiaem~ sov~ the comp~t
nmittee with no roof
~s pmpedy screened
)mmittee;
promuip~ specific
Guidelines and be approved by Akchi~ Review
Commiliee; ~d ,
parkin~ shall b~ loca~ at fl~e sides r~r of building.
However, where ~, ~ may I~..allowed in front of,
the buildings if ~ and landscaping ~s are acceptable
In addition, the applicant has submitted proposed
requirins approval by Dallas Area Affordable 1~
exterior design and signs.
propaly coven~ts
rmers IV, L.P., of
llem# 14
helpful for City review of the project, if the develc
cop~ of the Riverch~ Desisn Ou~delines.
Most important of all, there are major di~
submitted by the engineerl~ consultant and the
consultant. For example: ,
the northwesUm~ boundary of Lot 1 is about 3.'
than it is on the si~e plan and ~ plan.
&e buildings shown on the irrigation plan ap~
the City's drainage easement.
the landscal~ plans show Lot 2 as a landsc
while the plat and si2 plan do not.
~r would provide a
d siU~ plan tlum it i~
the landscape and ~ plato show a l~posed
Boulevard median break at the north end of th~ pmpe~, while the
plat and si~e plan do not.
RON:
ante which requires
in the deeds for the
a. According to the
ded for that type of
with the si~e plans
4 nnd 5.
RF_X~O~NDATiON TO THE PLANNING ~ ZONINO COMMI~
Staff recommends ~ of the ~ plm
Section VIII, ~ C.6. of the $~ Ordk
a site plan, approved by the Riverchase
Commitl~e, which correlal~ with the si~e
r~ming to the PD District on Lot I and
submitted for Special Use Permits on Lots
a landscape plan, ~ by the Ri~
owners by paragra~ 5 of the ~ ~ and Mutual
Item # 14
a copy of the Riverchase Archi~ Revie~
Guidelines.
copies of Exhibits "H' and 'I' of the pmpo
Covenants and Mutua~ Insress, ~ and Pa~
inclusion of ~ ~ assessment
any common area shown on the plat, site plan
3) Modi~ ~ ~ P~t
1) Preliminary Plat
2) Sit~ PLan
4) ~t~ Comm~t~
Item# 14
~ D~P Propmy