Loading...
MacPlaza1 Speed-CS 960118CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO: S-1103R, SPEEDEE OIL CHANGE P & Z HEARING DATE: January 18, 1996 C.C. HEARING DATE: February 13, 1996 LOCATION: West side of MacArthur Boulevard; approximately 888' north of Beltline Road SIZE OF AREA: Total site area: .70523 acres CURRENT ZONING: C (Commercial) REQUEST: C-S.U.P. (Commercial, Special Use Permi0 APPLICANT: Owner: Ron Wilson 15317 Midway Rd. Dallas, TX 75244 (214) 661-1204 Engineer: Hennessey Engineering, Inc. 1409 Third Ave. Carrollton, TX 75006 (214) 245-9478 HISTORY: In 1994 the City reclassified the zoning of this property from MF- 2 Multi-Family Residential to O Office. A lawsuit resulted. In connection with a settlement agreement not yet approved by the court, the City changed the zoning to C Commercial in late 1995. Agents for the owner are in the process of preparing a preliminary plat of the property between MaeArthur Boulevard and the electric transmission line, north of Riverchase Drive. TRANSPORTATION: MacArthur Boulevard is a 4-lane divided thoroughfare built in a 110'-wide right-of-way shown on the thoroughfare plan as a P6D, 6-lane divided thoroughfare. Item # 12 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North - South - East - West - vacant; "C" Commercial vacant; "C" Commercial Jefferson at Riverchase Apartments; "MF-2" Multi-Family vacant; "C" Commercial TP&L transmission line r.o.w.; "A" Agriculture COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The 1987 Comprehensive Plan shows Office. DISCUSSION: This proposal is the lead project of a probable 5-site development involving two automobile-related uses, a drive-in restaurant and a self- storage facility. All four of the known prospective land purchasers require special use permits prior to site improvements. It is possible to construct these types of facilities without adverse effects on community image. It requires very careful attention to landscaping, skillful coordination of building materials and architectural design, and restraint in the use of signage. The site plan review process required by a special use permit affords the City the mechanism by which it can orchestrate an urban design solution which will set the tone for future commercial development on MacArthur Boulevard and elsewhere as well. MacArthur Boulevard is a divided thoroughfare with a bermed median planted with street trees. There are no overhead power lines on either side to clutter the appearance. The majority of the existing development along MacArthur is residential in character with landscaped masonry wails and, in some cases, housing facing the street. While all major thoroughfares within the city are considered primary image zones, in terms of visual appearance, this street has more at risk and more to protect. The applicant has been very cooperative in making revisions to improve the site plan and its visual impact on the street. An earlier submission on a smaller property resulted in negotiation for a larger tract and a much improved site layout. The land planner reversed the building on the site to present a simple, unencumbered brick wall to the street side. The applicant has agreed to coordinate brick type and color with that of adjoining properties. Several highly important details remain unresolved, however. Staff has not seen a landscape plan for the entire subdivision and, therefore, does not know if the landscaping for this site is consistent with that of the others. The applicant has not provided building material selections nor information concerning color and type of attached signs. Without further information regarding site development on adjoining properties, staff Item # 12 cannot assess properly the location of the fire lane. If, for example, Waffle is to be one-way on any part of a cross-easement, it may be better for the fire lane to be located on a cross-easement which is two-way its entire length. While staff is satisfied that this applicant is attempting to accomplish known city development objectives regarding this property, the lack of a cohesive plan for all that is take place around it makes it difficult to evaluate the proposal thoroughly, without rather specific conditions as listed below. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a Special Use Permit for an automotive facility on this property subject to revision of the site plan, landscaping and building elevations to observe the following conditions: Materials as shown on building elevations with face brick of commercial grade no lighter than Boral 3205 Doeskin and no darker than Boral 3605 Red Brown, with the exception of accent bands which may be lighter or darker. Provision of cornice details and information concerning cornice materials. Provision of details regarding attached signs and directional signs, if any; including their size, color, type and lighting. Provision of trees a minimum of 3" in caliper and coordination of landscaping with that provided on adjoining sites. Provision on either the east side or west side of the site of a fire lane which is two-way across its full .length connecting the two driveway entrances from MacArthur Boulevard north and south of the property. 6. Compliance with Engineering comments. Unless additional plans and information are provided at or before the January hearing, which clearly address and respond to these concerns and therefore do not require additional review time, the best course of action will be to hold the public heating open until February 15. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Approve the Special Use Permit 2) Disapprove the Special Use Permit 3) Modify the Special Use Permit Item # 12 ATTACHMENTS: 1) Preliminary Site Plan 2) Engineering Comments Item # 12