Loading...
Lakeside V2-LR 960429 (2) Maxim Tech. e Southwestern Labs 2575 Lone Star Dr. · P.O. Box 224227 Dallas, Texas 75222 T E ¢ H N O L O G I E $ I N ¢ Telephone: (214) 631-2700 FA~ (214) 920-1891 REPORT OF CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CMENT: THE KROG~.R CO Attn: Jeff Kruegar 100 Kroger Drive Keller, TX 76248 PROJECT NO.: 0903506037 REPORT NO.: 39500 PROJECT: Kroger ~/~448 DATE OF SERVICE: 4/01/96 Coppell, TX AUTHORIZATION: John REPORT DATE: 4/29/96 SERVICES: Sample concrete at location of placement, perform required field tests, prepare and test concrete compressive strength specimens. PROJECT DATA CONTRACTOR: David Christopher, Inc. CLASS OF CONCRETE: }(ix Number 46 CONCRETE SUPPLIER: TXI DATE OF PLACEMENT: 4/01/96 PLANT: 41 TIME SAMPLED: 07 :iSAM BY: Marlo Villanueva SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS TEMPERATURE ('F) - AIR: 46 CONCRETE: 58 STRENGTH: 3000psi @ 28 DAYS TRUCK NO: 458 TICKET NO: 562511 SLUMP: 5" Max. AIR CONTENT(%): N/A AIR: N/A LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: METHOD OF TEST: ASTM C-39 Dock area slab-on-grade on Lines L-M/13-22 ASTM C-143 Sampled @ Line L/13. REPORT OF TESTS CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH - 6 X 12 CYLINDERS CYLINDER MEASURED MAXIMUM COMPRESSIVE MARKED SLUMP DATE AGE DIAMETER AREA LOAD STRENGTH SET NO. (inches} TESTED (days) (in.} [sq.in.) (lbs. force} [psi} REMARKS 1 1 5.25 4/08/96 7 6.00 28.27 98890 3500 1 2 5.25 4/08/96 7 6.00 28.27 103480 3660 1 3 5.25 4/29/96 28 6. O0 28.27 126860 4490 1 4 5.25 4/29/96 28 6.00 28.27 116890 4130 Technician: Marlo Villanueva Started: 06:30AM Stopped: 09:30AM Technic ian Report Distribution: MAXIM TECH.,~)UTHWESTERN LABS (1) THE [ROGER CO (1) David Christopher, inc. ~. ~ (1) City of Col=pelt - Eng. Dept. . (1) City of Coppe[[ - Bldg. Insp. Arthur ~.cnerly III, CET Project Manager 1001 LW Our letters and reoorts are for the exclusive use of_the client .to w~orn they are addressed and shall not he reproduced excel3t In full without the approval of tl~e testing laboratory, ina use oz ourname must receive our %vrttten aml~roval. Our letters and reports al~p~y only to the sarn~e tested and/or inspecte~l, and are not inc~icative of the quantities of aDl~arently identical or similar Droducts.