Lakeside V2-LR 960318 (2)MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
~aterial~ F. avironmeutal ami C~o~clmical ~oa~llafioa, l~mdam~tai Tmtia8 aad Analy6ml Set'~cm
P.O. Box 224227 * 2575 Lone Slat Drive * I)das, Tm 75212 * 214/631-2700 Melro 263-1133
REPORT NO: 38941
CLIENT: The Kroger Company
DATE: March 18, 1996
PROJECT: Kroger Store #448, Coppell, Texas
CLIENT NO: 0903506037
PAGE I of 2
A FLOOR SURFACE ANALYSIS
LOCATION SURVEYED : Slab on Grade, E.7to K.5 and 11 to 17
Placement 4
APPROXIMATE AREA : 8,600 sf
ASTM STANDARD : ASTM E 1155
INSTRUMENT USED "Dipstick", manufactured by Face Technologies;
Norfolk, Virginia
SAMPENG METHOD Point elevations were measured at regular 12 inch intervals along
straight lines up to 52 feet in length. The elevation differences between all adjacent reading points, the
arithmetic differences between ail adjacent 12 inch elevation differences, and the elevation differences
between all points separated 10 feet were then calculated. Estimates of the floor's flatness and level-
ness F-Numbers (Ff & FI) were obtained through a statistical analysis of these calculated profile values.
The tabular data is available upon request.
COMBINED OVERALL VALUE RESULTS: PLACEMENT 4
90% Conf. Range 90% Conf. Range
Ff - + Fl - +
29.0 27.2 3o.9 24.1 22.4 25.8
· Based upon the number of samples taken, there is a g0% certainty that tho actual F-Numbers ol the surlaces surveyed WILL left wtthin the rang~
which follow the respective eslim&tad Flatnesl and Levelness F-Numbers.
SpE(~IRIL"~:LIMITSi-i.!-:'..:~i~..'::..' ':' :::.~ :':~: '. ::~ :.:: i~.~-i..::...:::.i!i.:::::~.i~, i ::i i". ::.--.:..:.':..': 'i.:~::::'
' '::~= "::-::':~:i'~i=;;..;/s~ified'~rallValUe:'.iFf25i.:: ..'i :..'::~. ;-'ii': ~ -:'::-i-'::~i..:::!:~;:::--:--:::.'i"=-:-~:~..~- '.-':' ~;:'::.:..'.: i':::-! i '
:.': ..;' .: .i!.~.:~:::::'i:.'s~if-~Ci.-~ei~ii-~/~iue!:.~:~ .::::-:; ..-:.~. ::~:~....:¥ ::.:::..::;::::::::~i.~:'i-::~:-~.~.!;:.;:;;.:i;':~:::.;.!:~:~:.~;'::.~..:::.. -. ======================= .:
:.:: -': :' ':-.' :'. :.' ':'" .~i-~.-';~:::'-~::' '.i :.: '.:: ::' ... :-.'.: i:-::...' '.::: :::~:~:::?: ::...":~:'.:'. ::'" ':.'::..:'-::~-':' '::.':'...:,
COMMEN'TS: The composite F-Ratne.*-~ and F-Leveln~ Numbers on this placement are SHPI~I!OR =.' to the specified lim~.
TECHNICIAN: L. BRACKEN Max/m T¢chnoIogJes, ~_nc.
Construction Materials Engineering Division
MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
REPORT NO: 38941
CLIENT: The Kroger Company
DATE: March 18, 1996
PROJECT: Kroger Store #448, Coppell, Texas
CLIENT NO: 0903506037
PAGE 2 of 2
A FLOOR SURFACE ANALYSIS
LOCATION SURVEYED '. Slab on Grade, E.7 to K.5 and 11 to 17
Placement 4
APPROXIMATE AREA : 8,600 s.f.
PLACEMENT DATE 03/15/96 90% Conf. Range 90% Conf. Range
Survey Line Pts. Ff - + FI - +
I- I 52 30.70 25.32 36.08 27.57 22.74 32.40
I - 2 52 18.71 15.43 21.99 26.51 21.86 31.16
I - 3 52 31.38 25.88 36.88 34.04 28.07 40.01
I- 4 52 37.09 30.59 43.59 20.93 17.26 24.60
I - 5 52 32.04 26.42 37.66 22.00 18.14 25.86
I - 6 52 46.62 38.45 54.79 20.75 17.11 24.39
OVERALL AREA Pts. Ff - + FI - +
COMBINED: 312 29.0 27.20 30.90 24.1 22.40 25.80
* Based upon the number ot samples taken, there is a g0~ certainty that the actual F-Numbers of the suffn,~__ surveyed WILL fall
within the ranges which follow the mspecthte estima2ed Flatne~ and Le~elnes~ F-Number~