Lakeside V2-LR 960219 (3) Maxim Tech. · Southwestern Labs
2575 Lone Star Dr. · P.O. Box 224227
Dallas, Texas 75222
Telephone: (214! 631-2700
T E C H N O L O O I E S I N C FAX: (214) 920-1891
REPORT OF
IN-PLACE DENSITY
CLIENT: THE KROGER CO
Attn: Jeff Kruegar
100 Kroger Drive
Keller, TX 76248 PRO-~ECTNO.: 0903506037
REPORT NO.: 37080A
PROJECT: Kroger ~448 DATE OF SERVICE: 2/08/96
AUTHORIZATION: John
Coppell Tx. REPORT DATE: 2/19/96
SERVICES: Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine the degree
of field compaction.
PROJECT DATA MOISTURE/DENSITY RELATIONS
CONTRACTOR: David Christopher, Inc. OPTIMUM MAXIMUM
MATERIALS MOISTURE % DENSITY pcf
TESTOF: Building pad 36653 Red clay sand 13.0 117.5
METHOD OF TEST:
DENSITY: ASTM D2922 SPECIFICATION
MOISTURE: ASTM D3017 DENSITY: 95% Dry Density MOISTURE:-2% to +2% opt.
REPORT OF TESTS
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCATION (%) (%) (Pcf) {Pcf) (% max)
1. 40-' S. & 50' W. of the N.E.
corner of building, 4th lift. 15.0 13.0 115.5 117.5 98
2. 40' S. & 85' W. of the N.E.
corner of building, 4th lift. 13.4 13.0 111.6 117.5 95
3. 40' S. & 65' E. of the N.W.
corner of building, 4th lift. 13.4 13.0 113.2 117.5 96
4. 90' S. & 35' E. of the N.W.
corner of building, 4th lift. 13.6 13.0 111.7 117.5 95
Report Of Tests Continued On Page 2
1007 JS Our lettera and reportl Ma for the excluaive ule of the client to whom they Me oddre~led and ~hall not be reproduced except in
full withmJt tim 8pprovid of the tearing let)oratory. The use of ourname must recmve our written approvli. Our letters IrKI reports
M~pIy only to the simple teated ar, diM inipected, end Me not indicative of the quantitie~ of IppMefltly identical o~ simiior productl.
THE KROGER CO REPORT NO. 37080A
PROJECT NO. 0903506037 PAGE 2
DATE OF SERVICE: 2/08/96
REPORT OF TESTS ¢co. Hin~)
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCATION (%) (%) (Pcf) (Pcf) (% max)
5. 90' S. & 100' E. of the N.W.
corner of building, 4th lift. 15.3 * 13.0 114.5 117.5 97
6. 90' S. of 10' W. of the N.M.
corner of building, 4th lift. 13.6 13.0 111.9 117.5 95
7. Dock area, 4th lift. 14.0 13.0 112.7 117.5 96
An asterisk (*) appears next to test results which
do NOT meet the project specifications as noted on page 1.
Technician: Paul D. Butler Started: 07:30AM Stopped: 09:30AM
C.E.T.
Report Distribution: MAXIM TECH. ~SOUTHWESTERN LABS
(1) THE KROGER CO ~ -~-
(1) David Christopher, Inc.
(1) City of CoppeJ[
Arthur E I, CET
1007 JS Our Iottem and report~ are for the exclusive t~e of the client to whom they are ecl~lreaeed ~ ~heil not be reproduced excel~t in
full w:thout the a~proval of the te~ting laboratory. The u~e of surname mu~t rocewe our written ~oproval. Ou~ letter, and reports
~ol~y only to the sample te~ted Ind/or inlpected, end I~e not indiclt:ve of the qulrttitie~ of II,patently identical or aimila~ products.