Lakeside V2-LR 960213 (4) Maxim Tach. · Southwestern Labs
2575 Lone Star Dr. · P.O. Box 224227
Dallas, Texas 75222
T E C H N O L O G I ~: $ I N C Telephone: (214) 631-2700
FAX: (214) 920-1891
REPORT OF
IN-PLACE DENSITY
CLIENT: TBS KROGF. R CO
Attn: Jeff Kruegar
100 Kroger Drive
Keller, TX 76248 PROOMCT NO.: 0903506037
REPORT NO.: 36815
PROJECT: Kroger DATE OF SERVICE: 1/30/96
AUTHORIZATION: John
REPORT DATE: 2/13/96
SERVICES: Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine the degree
of field compaction.
PROJECT DATA MOISTURE/DENSITY RELATIONS
CONTRACTOR: David Christopher, Inc, OP33MUM MAXIMUM
MATERIALS MOISTURE % DENSITY ocf
TEST OF: Paving Subgrade 35461-Lt. bwn clay sand w/gr. 12.0 121.5
Paving Subgrade 35460A-Tanntsh bwn clay sand* 8.5 130.0
Paving Subgrade 35459A-Tannish bwn clay sand** 7.5 135.0
METHOD OF TEST:
DENSITY: ASTM D2922 SPECIFIGA~ON
MOISTURE: ASTM D3017 DENSITY: 95% DRY DF_~SITY MOISTURE: _+ 2% opt moist
REPORT OF TESTS
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCATION t'%} (%1 (Pct') (Pcfl (% max)
1. Paving subgrade, 50' north
& 75' east of the southwest
corner 11.0 12.0 116.9 121.5 96
2. Pavin~ subgrade, 50' north
& 200 east of the southwest
corner 7.6 8.5 127.1 130.0 98
3. Pavin~ subgrade, 50' north
& 100 west of the southeast
corner 11.3 12.0 117.4 121.5 97
Report Of Tests Continued On Page 2
1007 LW .O? I .e~..ers. s.nd reports .ere. f? the.exclusive use of_the client .to whom t~ey are addressed and shell not be reproduced except tn
IUll .WCllqU~ m{. approvm, oz. m.e.tesRn, g Ip. borat.ory: m n.e use o! pu.r. na.m. e mvs..t receivp. ~ v~r. ttten approval.. ~ letters .and rep. orts
apply only to me sample ~esteo eno/or Inspec~eo, ar~ are not in=lcaave or me quammes o~ appareritly laenflca o~ similar proaucts.
THE KROGF~ CO REPORT NO. 36815
PROJECT NO. 0903506037 PAGE 2
DATE OF SERVICE: ~/30/96
REPORT OF TESTS (Continu~)
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCA~ON ~%) ~1 {P~ (P~ {% m~)
4 Paving subgrade, 175 north &
100' west of the southeast
corner 10.5 8.5 125.9 130.0 97
5 Paving sub,fade, 175 north &
200' east ~f the southwest
corner 5.7 7.5 133.2 135.0 99
6 Paving subgrade, 175' north &
75' east of the southwest
corner 5 8 7.5 133.9 135.0 99
7 Paving sub,fade, 225 north &
75' east of the southwest
corner 6 0 7.5 132.8 135.0 98
8 Paving subgrade, 225 north &
150' west of the southeast
corner 7 4 8.5 126.1 130.0 97
9 Paving subKrade, 150 south &
75' west o[ the northeast
corner 12 0 12.0 117.7 121.5 97
10 Paving subgrade, 40' south &
175' west of the northeast
corner 8 5 8.5 124.6 130.0 96
11 Paving sub,fade, 45' south &
50' east of the northwest
corner 10 0 12.0 118.9 121.5 98
12 Paving sub~rade, 100' south &
30' east of the northwest
corner 10 1 12.0 121.0 121.5 100
13 Paving subKrade, 150' south &
75' west o~ the northeast
corner, first lift 12 1 12.0 118.0 121.5 97
Test results on this report meet project
specifications as noted on page 1.
Report Of Tests Continued On Page 3
1007 LW Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use ofthe client.to wflom they are addressed a.n.d shall not .be_reproduced ex. cept In
ful .wffho. ut the_approval, of the test nc] I~boratory: ~ n.e use o!..oufpa..m.e m.us.t receive, our .written app. ro.v~...uu.r letters..an(] rep. o~s
app,y omy to me sample tested and/Or inspectea, ana are not inolCaTJve OT TJle quammes o~ apparemly iaenacm or similar proauc~s.
THE KROGER CO REPORT NO. 36815
PROJECT NO. 0903506037 PAGE 3
DATE OF SERVICE: 1/30/96
REPORT OF TESTS
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
* 35460A- w/gravel ** 35459A- w/gravel
Technician: Paul D. Butler Started: 08:30AM Stopped: ll:30AM
C.E.T.
Report Distribution: MAXIM TECH.~UTHWESTERN LABS
(1) THE KROGER CO
(1) David Christopher, inc.
(1) City of Coppe[[
Arthur ~:tnerly III, CET
1007 LW Our le..~.ers and reports are for the exclusive use ofthe client .to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except In
full .wknout the_approva! of the.testin¢; laboratory. ~n.e use oT ourname m~st receive, our wr. itten approveJ. Our letters and reports
apply only to ;ne sample testeo and/Or inspected, ann are not Indicative o1' the quarnmes oT apparerttly identical or similar products.