Lakeside V2-LR 960206 Maxim Tech.. Southwestern Labs
2575 Lone Star Dr. · P.O. Box 224227
Dallas, Texas 75222
T E C H N O L O G I E $ I N C Telephone: (214) 631-2700
FAX: (214) g20-1891
REPORT OF
IN-PLACE DENSITY
CLIENT: ~;. ~OGF. R CO
Attn: Jeff Kruegar
100 Kroger Drive
Keller, l~Z 76248 PROJECT NO.: 0903506037
REPORT NO.: 36578
PROJECT: Kroger DATE OF SERVICE: 1/24/96
AUTHORIZATION: John
REPORT DATE: 2/06/96
SERVICES: Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine the degree
of field compaction.
PROJECT DATA MOISTUREmENSFrY RELAllONS
CONTRACTOR: David Christopher, Inc. OPTIMUM MAXIMUM
MATERIALS MOISTURE % DENSffY oc~
TEST OF: Utility backfill 35458A-Tan Sand 12.0 110.5
Utility backfill 35461-Lt bwn clayey sand s/grv 12.0 121.5
METHOD OF TEST:
DENSITY: AS~[ D2922 SPECIFICATION
MOISTURE: ASTM D3017 DENSFFY: 95Z DRY DENSITY MOISTURE: _+ 2Z opt moist
REPORT OF TESTS
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSFFY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCATION (%) (%) (Pcfl (Pcfl (% max)
1. Water Line, North sidez 65'
east of inlet, final lift 13.9 12.0 105.0 110.5 95'
2. Water Line. North side, 65'
- eas-t -of- ~nle~;" =2~ "1~ .... - ...... -.- h ._~ ._~ .--=--~ .... ~ ...........
grade 12.9 12.0 116.4 121.5 96
3. Water Line, North side, 30'
west of fire hydrant, final
lift 12.9 12.0 105.4 .110.5 95
4. Water Line, North side, 30'
west of F/H, -2' below grade 13.2 12.0 108.4 110.5 98
Report Of Tests Continued On Page 2
1007 LW ~ I .e~.~ers. ~ repo~s We. f..or ~e .excl.u$1ve use of_the cllef~ .to v~om ~ey .are ad,~essad .a~.,d sh~l not be reproduced ex. ce~ In
m, .vmnqm.me. a~rov~, o~ me tesa.n.g .m~oratory.. m.e use oT pu..rna.m.e mgq.~ receive, our ~. ~en apgro.vN.. Ou~ letters aha reRorts
apply only to the sample tested aha/or inspectea, ana are no~ inalcaave o~me quammes o~ apparermy laentlcal or similar proaucts.
THE I<ROGF, R CO REPORT NO. 36578
PROJECT NO. 0903506037 PAGE 2
DATE OF SERVICE: 1/24/96
REPORT OF TESTS
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCA~ON f~ (%) (P~ (P~ ~ m~)
5. Inlet fill, northwest corner
of site 13.2 12.0 105.0 110.5 95
6. Water Line, North side, 75'
east of northwest corner,
-2' below grade 13.0 12.0 110.5 110.5 100
7. Water Line, north side, 75'
east of northwest corner,
grade 14.0 12.0 110.0 110.5 100
8. Junction Box, north side 12.4 12.0 112.8 110.5 102
9. Water Line, west side, 120'
south junction box 12.0 12.0 115.4 121.5 95
10. Water Line, west side, 200'
south junction box 12.3 12.0 116.1 121.5 96
Test results on this report meet project
specifications as noted on page 1.
Technician: Paul D. Butler Started: 09:30AM Stopped: 12: 30PM
C.E.T.
Report Distribution: MAXIM TECH.~SOUTHWESTERN LABS
(1) THE KROGER CO
(1) David Christopher, ir~.
(1) City of
theL ~3~J~II, CET
1007 LW Our letters and reports .are for the .exc~..slve u. se of_the client .to whom they .are ad. dressed an~cl shall not .be .[epr.qd~u_ced n~Creel~olr~s
full without the approve, of the.res .1~g..mlmorazory; {~ use OT pu..mam, e mys3 rece'~q~pur w;~en epp~ro.v[u~._.._u~_[ ,errse/msll~a_ro~ucts
apply only to the sample testea aha/or lnspectea, aha are not irlalCaave o1' me quamme$ or apparenw ~aenacm or s p .