Lakeside V2-LR 960130 Maxim Tech. e Southwestern Labs
2575 Lone Star Dr. · P.O. Box 224227
Dallas, Texas 75222
Telephone: (214) 631-2700
FAX: (214) 920-1891
REPORT OF
IN-PLACE DENSITY
CLIENT: THE KROGER CO
Attn: Michael Roaas
100 Kroger Drive
Keller, TX 76248 PROOECTNO.: 0903506037
REPORT NO.: 36454
PROJECT: Kroger DATE OF SERVICE: 1/22/96
AUTHORIZATION:
REPORT DATE: 1/30/96
SERVICES: Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine the degree
of field compaction.
PROJECT DATA MOISTURE;qDENSITY RELATIONS
CONTRACTOR: David Christopher, Inc. OPTIMUM MAXIMUM
MATERIALS MOISTURE % DENSITY, pcf
TEST OF: Building Pad 36371A-Reddish brown silty 13.5 116.5
sandy clay w/ iron ore frag.
METHOD OF TEST:
DENSITY: ASTM D2922 SPECIFICATION
MOISTURE: ASTM D3017 DENSITY: 95% DRY DENSITY MOISTURE: +_ 2% opt moist
REPORT OF TESTS
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCATION (%) (%~ (Pcfl (Pc~ ~% maxi
1. 30' South & 10' west of the
northeast conrer, second lift 10.9 * 13.5 109.4 116.5 94 *
2. 60' South & 10' west of the
northeast corner, second lift 13.4 13.5 110.9 116.5 95
2. 30' South & 10' west of the
northeast corner, first lift 13.5 13.5 l!O.a 116.5 95
4. 60' South & i0' west of the
northeast corner, first lift 13.6 13.J = !i0.~ 116.5 95
Report Of Tests Continued On Page 2
1007 LW Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are adaressed and shall not be reproduced except in
fu~l without the approval of the testincJ labcratory. The use of ourname must receive our w.tten approval. Our letters and reoorts
amply only to the sample tested and/Or inscectei:l, and are not inclicative of the quantities of aDparently identical or s~milar pro~3ucts.
THE KROGER CO REPORT NO. 36454
PROJECT NO. 0903506037 PAGE 2
DATE OF SERVICE: 1/22/96
REPORT OF TESTS (Continued)
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCATION I%1 (%) (PM IPcfl (% mm)
5. 30 South & 65~ west of the
northeast corner second lift 14 6 13 5 110 1 116.5 95
6. 30 South & 65' west of the
northeast corner first lift 13 9 13 5 110 7 116.5 95
7. 60 South & 65' west of the
northeast corner second lift 13 2 13 5 112 4 116.5 96
8. 60 South & 65~ west of the
northeast corner first lift 14 0 13 5 110 1 116.5 95
9. 30 South & 120' west of the
northeast corner second lift 14 2 13 5 110 6 116.5 95
10. 30 South & 120' west of the
northeast corner first lift 15 5 13 5 110 1 116.5 95
I~. 60 South & 120' west of the
northeast corner second lift 14 0 13 5 110 5 116.5 95
~2. 60 South & 120' west of the
northeast corner first lift 13 8 13 5 110 2 116.5 95
An asterisk (*) appears next to test results which
do NOT meet the project specifications as noted on page 1.
Technician: Paul D. Butler Started: 08:00A~M Stopped: 10:O0~M
C.E.T.
Report Distribution: MAXIM TECH..SOUTHWESTERN LABS
(1) THE KROGER CO
(1) David Christopher, inc. ~ E~
(1) City of Coppe[[
III, CET
1007 LW
Cur letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in
,~11 'without the acproval cf the testing laboratory. The use of ourname must receive our written approval. Our letters and rec)orts
&D=ly Only to the sample tested and/or inspecte~l, and are not indicative of the cluantit~es of apparently identical or s~milar ,3rcduc:s.