Northlake 635(01)-CS 860518Rcp/let
HATTIE MAE LESLEY
Plaintiff
VS.
CITY OF COPPELL
(A Municipal Corporation)
Defendant
Cause No. g6-15013-B
IN THE DISTRICT C
Ot~TH 3UDICIAL CO
DALLAS COUNTY~
STIPULATION RE: TARYON BOWMAN
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES now HATTIE MAE LESLEY~ Plaintiff by and thro~
the CITY OF COPPELL by and through its attorney~ and t~
attorneys hereby agree and stipulate to the offering and admissiol
out below by Taryon Bowman, Planning and Zoning Coordinator of
who could~ will~ and does testify to the following:
Testimony of Taryon Bowman
A. "My name is Taryon Bowman and I am over the age of 18 y
mind. I am fully competent to give this testimony. I have person
facts stated herein from a review of the records of the City
knowledge from my work and experience as the Planning and Zon
the City of Coppell and these statements are true and correct.
willing, and do testify to them as follows:
B. 1. "The property on the west side of Belt Line Road Nort!
north to the south edge of what is known as the C~
Company Northlake 635 Business Park~ and as more pa
as Tract 2, in Exhibit B-#6#-01/0t~ being a true ar
attached and incorporated herein of City of Coppell Or
STIPULATION RE TARYON BOWMAN - Page I of t~
OURT
JRT
tEXAS
gh her attorney and
parties and their
of the evidence set
he City of Coppell~
ears. I am of sound
al knowledge of the
of Coppell and my
lng Coordinator for
I am ready, able,
~/South, from 1-635,
}nnell Development
rticularly described
Ld correct copy is
dinance No. 86-359,
Rcp/let
C.
E. 1.
was zoned ~~A~/C~'/'~'~' has been zoned
was annexed into the City of Coppell on June 2#, 1986.
"The zoning has not been changed and there have
made or granted to change that zoning since
statement.
"The property on the east side of Belt Line Road
Hackberry Road North to the south edge of what is
Park, and as more particularly described as Tracts 3
~65-01/0% being a true and correct copy attached and
of the City of Coppell Ordinance No. 86-360, was zon.
and has been zonedfl~/~rr~tr~z since it was anne>
Coppell on 6/2#/86.
The zoning has not been changed and there have been
or granted to change that zoning since 6[2t,~[86 t.
statement~ except as reflected in the attached and in,
dated .
The attached copy of "Plate 9, City of Coppell Existin
at Pasge 59 of the February 1987 City of Coppell
(Exhibit C-#~5) is not correct concerning the Lesley
Paragraphs B and C herein. Plate 9 shows the existing
Light Industrial. That is wrong. The zoning lot the pre
B and C herein are and have been zoned ~'~c~e~r~'~e,
Coppell since 6[2t4186 and have not been and are not n(
Industrial by the City of Coppell. There is no pending
granted to change the zoning of these properties to Lig]
Exhibit C-2178-12 to -14 is a true and correct
incorporated herein of page 9 of the Zoning Ordinan¢
with reference to Section 8) "A" Agricultural)
since it
~een no applications
to the date of this
North/South, from
k aown as North Lake
STIPULATION RE TARYON BOWMAN - Page 2 of ~
and q in Exhibit B-
incorporated herein
:ed into the City of
~o applications made
the date of this
:orporated copies of
Zoning", appearing
:omprehensive Plan
roperty described in
,.oning to be 'LI" for
~erties in Paragraph
~z. by the City of
>w zoned "LI", Light
application made or
~t Industrial.
copy attached and
:e, City of Coppell~
Rcp/let ~,
F. 1.
02 (a true and correct
currently zoned
since
to that date.
The property on the west side o! Belt Line Road No
north edge of the Lesley property~ described in Paragrl
south edge of Cowboy Drive~ known as the Northlake
and reflected in Exhibit 38q-01/02, particularly the dra'
copy is attached and incc
. All of that proper
. It was zoned
DAY OF
SIGNED THIS
sworn to before
Subscribed and
day of
seal of office.
STIPULATION RE TARYON BOWMAN - Page 3 of ~
TARYON P. BOWMA
PLANNING AND ZOI
COORDINATOR
CITY OF COPPELL
me, the undersigned no
~ 19 ~ to certify which
Notary Public
My commission expir
:th/South~ from the
~ph B herein~ to the
635 Business Park,
ring in Exhibit 884-
rporated herein) is
ty has been zoned
prior
1989.
N
qING
tory public on this
witness my hand and
Rcp/let ~
The parties agree and stipulate that the above statements
may be offered into evidence by either party without further pr
objection, except as to relevancy.
By the signature of the attorneys reflected below~ the atto
the agreement and stipulation of their respective clients and them
Date:
Date:
STIPULATED AND !
ROBERT C. PRATHE
Attorney for Plaintif
DON COLLELUORI,
Attorney for Defenda
STIPULATION RE TARYON BOWMAN - Page q of #
of Taryon Bowman
edicate and without
rneys are reflecting
,elves.
GREED:
.R,
nt