Northlake 635(2)-CS 960919CASE:
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
NORTHLAKE 635 BUSINESS PARI
OF LOT 1. BLOCK A
P & Z HEARING DATE: September 19, 1996
CC HEARING DATE: October 8, 1996
LOCATION:
Southwest comer of Beltline Road and Wra~
SIZE OF AREA:
CURRENT ZONING:
12.425 acres of property- 3 buildings totalinl
Building A- 116,480 s.f.
Building B- 64,000 s.f.
Building C- 42,240 s.f.
hi (Light Industrial)
REQUF_3T:
Approval of replat
APPLICANT:
HISTORY:
Owner:
Lincoln CBC, Ltd.
300 Lincoln Plaza
Dallas, TX 75201
(214) 740-3300
Representative:
Brockette/Davis
4144 North Centr
Dallas, TX 752C
(214) 824-3647
A preliminary plat for the entire Northlake 63:
approved by the Planning and Zoning Co:
However, only the road system of this businesf
Plat approval on January 22, 1985.
TRANSPORTATION:
Belt Line Road is an existing &lane divided
120' wide fight-of-way. Wrangler Drive is a
with side ditches in a 60' wide right-of-way.
shows it as C4U in a 70' wide right-of-way.
an existing C2U, two-lane undivided road buill
of-way.
Item # 8
L RI .PLAT
let Drive
222,740 s.f.
Drake, Inc.
~ Expwy., Ste. 1100
4
Business Park was
~mission in 1984.
park received Final
major arterial in a
2-lane asphalt road
Thoroughfare plan
Lakeshore Drive is
in a 60' wide right-
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North
South -
East -
West
Park West Commerce Center II warehouse/dis!
vacant (proposed Prentiss office/warehouse f
Industrial zoning
vacant (proposed Vari-lite office/warehouse
Industrial zoning
North Lake; City of Dallas
vacant; ~LI* Light Industrial zoning
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan shows the a
industrial/showroom uses.
DISCUSSION:
This replat is to create a single 12.425 acre lot to accommodate the ct
warehouse distribution facilities. The distribution facilities being proposed a
than the ones reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission in previous
B and C will be accessed from Wrangler Drive and Building A will be acces
Drive. Staff had raised some concern with regards to the eastern most drivel
to Belt Line Road. The driveway as shown meets City's minimu:
requirements. However, to avoid any conflicts with the Wrangler Dri
intersection the Engineering Department has requested the applicant look at
driveway further west.
Space and use allocation of each building appears to be similar. Approx
building will be office, the rest will be used for warehousing. Building B
with front yard parking, therefore, it observes a 60' front yard setback.
For the most part this submittal conforms to the City's requirements, howew
be required to make minor modifications to both the replat and landscape
providing adequate landscaping. The area enclosed behind the 6'-high masor
from landscaping. Approval of the application requires a variance of
screening wall requirement to permit the hedge screening of the loading dc
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISS
Staff recommends approval of this replat subject to the following condition
Change plat reference in City Secretary's signature block from fina
Modify Floodplain Administrator's signature block to include only th
floodplain development permit application number.
Provide site and landscape plans which agree. Brick pavers are show
Item # 8
ribufion facility and
tcility); *LI~ Light
~cility); 'LI' Light
~a suitable for light
,nstruction of three
re of a smaller scale
months. Buildings
~ed from Lakeshore
ray being too dose
n driving spacing
ye/Belt Line Road
)ossibly shifting the
mately 10% of the
the only structure
the applicant will
plan. Applicant is
ry walls are exempt
the brick masonry
ck of Building A.
[ON:
being met:
plat to replat.
~ portion that refers
n at drive entrances
on landscape plan but not on site plan.
On both Site Plan and Landscape Plan, under the tabulation for "Sit
R.O.W.", correct the square footage figure for feature landscapin
312,203 s.f.
Show tree ratios in the tabulations on Landscape Plan.
Modify note on Landscape Plan which references the 6'-high scree
variance being sought for hedge screening of Building A loading do
6. The irrigation plan must be signed and sealed by a licensed irrigato~
7. Compliance with Engineering comments.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the Replat
2) Recommend disapproval of the Replat
3) Recommend modification of the Replat
A"FI'AC~S:
1) Replat
2) Site Plan
3) Landscape Plan
4) Departmental Comments
Item # 8
Less 5' Wrangler
from 318,531 to
hedge to read "a