Northlake 635(2)-LR 970515 (2)TECHNOLOGIES INC
REPORT OF
DRILLED pIER INSPECTION
CLIENT: Lincoln Property Co.
500 N. AKARD, SUITE 3300
ATTN: LARRY MOON
Dallas, TX 75201
PROJECT:
COPPELL BUSINESS CENTER
WRANGLER DR AND BELTLINE RD
COPPELL TX
PROJECT NO.: 0903~
REPORT NO.: 11657
DATE OF SERVICE: 5
AUTHORIZATION: On
REPORT DATE: 5 / 1
SERVICES: Perform Drilled Pier Inspection.
REPORT OF INSPECTION
On this date, a Maxim Technologies representative arrived o
scheduled to perform a Drilled Pier Inspection. See attach
results of the inspection.
Technician Time: 7:00am to 5:30pm
Page 1 of 2
Technician: Rusty Bowers
Technician
Report Distribution:
MA~ C
(1) O'BRIE_R AS,~3ClATE~ INC.
b/La~n.c~
· Tech. Southwestern Labs
;75 Lone S~r Dr. P.O. Box 224227
D.It~% Texas 75222
Telephone: (214) 631-2700
FAX: (214) 920-1891
105034
8
/12/97
going
5/97
n site as
~d report for
~ABS
~Br~cken, B.S. Ch.E.
~ject Manager
TECHNOLOGIES INC
LINCOLN PROPERTY CO.
Project N":0903605034
Service Date:05~12~97
2575 Lone Star Drive * P.O. Box 224227 · Dalla~, Texas 75222
(214) 631-2700 · Fax (214)
DI~ILLED pIIZR INSPECTION
(STRAIGHT SHAFT)
Report N°: 116578
Page 2 of 3
Date Drilled:O5/12/97***OBSERVATION OF DRILLED FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION***
Pier identification H.4-9 G.9-9 H.6-9 J-8.4 J-8
Pier diameter(in)/Type 24 24 24 ~.0 24
Depth of pier from surface(ft) 37.0 37.2 36.0 37.6
Depth of bearing stratum from surface(ft) 30.5 30.5 30.0 29.5 31.5
Required penetration(ft) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Actual penetration(fO * 6.5 6.7 6.0 6.5 6.1
Condition of bottom{wet/dry) 2" Water 3" Water Trace 2" Water 2" Water
Plumb within tolerance(yes/no) yes yes yes yes yes
Casing diameter(in)/Length(ft) N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R
# of bars/Reinforcing bar size{#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of reinforcing steel(ft) 38.3 35.7 37.0 35.2 36.6
Time drilling was completed(am/pm) 10:17am 11:04am 1:47pm 1:10pm 3:03pm
Time concrete was placed(am/pm) 10:40am 11:27am 1:59pm 1:25pm 3:18pm
Depth of pier from top of concrete(ft) 38.8 36.2 37.5 35.7 37.1
Elevation:Surface (ft}* · 96.2 96.5 96.5 96.3 96.5
Elevation:Top of pier (ft)** 98.0 95.5 98.0 96.0 96.0
Elevation:Bottom pier (ft) °* 59.2 59.3 60.5 60.3 58.9
Elevation:Top of bearing stratum(fi)** 65.7 66.0 66.5 6618 65.0
Bearing stratum (Description) Dark gray unweathered shale.
NOTE: SEE REPORT # 116579 FOR COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST SPECIMENS.
* ADDITIONAL PENETRATION NOT REQUESTED UNLESS NOTED.
** ELEVATION BY OTHERS
TIME: 7:00 A.M. TO 5:30 P.M.
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproc uced except in full without the
approvaJ of the testing laboratory. The use of our name must receive prior written approvaJ of Maxim TechnoJog es, Inc. Letters and reports apply
only to the sample tested and/or inspected and are not indicative of the quantity of apparently identical or similar )roducts.
TECHNOLOGIES INC
LINCOLN PROPERTY CO.
Project N~:0903605034
Service Date: 05/12/97
2575 Lone Star Drive * P.O. Box 224227 s Dallas
(214) 631-2700 · Fax (214) 920-189
DRILLED PIER INSPECTION
(STRAIGHT SHAFT)
Texas 75222
Report N°: 116578
Page 3 of 3
Date DrilIed:O5/12/97***OBSERVATION OF DRILLED FOUNDATION
Pier identification J-8.6
Pier diameter(in)/Type 24
36.2
Depth of pier from surface(ft)
Depth of bearing stratum from surface(ft)
Required penetration(ft)
Actual penetration(ft) *
Condition of bottom(wet/dry)
Plumb within tolerance(yes/no)
30.0
Length of reinforcing steel(R)
Time drilling was completed(am/pm)
Time concrete was placed(am/pm)
Depth of pier from top of concrete(ft)
Elevation:Surface (ft)* °
Elevation:Top of pier (ft)**
Elevation:Bottom pier fit) ° °
Elevation:Top of bearing stratum{ft)ss
6.0
6.2
1" Water
yes
Casing diameter(in)/Length(ft) N/R
//of bars/Reinforcing bar size(//) 6/#6
34.9
Bearing stratum (Description)
4:02pm
4:16pm
35.4
96.8
96.0
60.6
66.8
Dark gray unweathered
CONSTRUCTION***
hale.
NOTE:
TIME:
SEE REPORT # 116579 FOR COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST SPECIMENS.
ADDITIONAL PENETRATION NOT REQUESTED UNLESS NOTED.
ELEVATION BY OTHERS
7:00 A.M. TO 5:30 P.M.
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reprodu
approval of the testing laboratory. The use of our name must receive prior written approval of Maxim Technologic
only to the sample tested and/or inspected and ars not indicative of the quantJW of apparently identical or similar
ced exce~ in full without the
s, Inc. Letters and reports apply
,roducts.