Loading...
Northlake 635(2)-LR 970206 (7)TECHNOLOGIES INC · Southwestern Labs Lone Star Dr. · P.O. Box 224227 Dallas, Texas 75222 Telephone: (214) 631-2700 FAX: (214) 920-1991 REPORT OF WATER INJECTION INSPECTION CLIENT: Lincoln Property Co. 500 N. AKARD, SUITE 3300 ATTN: LARRY MOON Dallas, TX 75201 PROJECT: COPPELL BUSINESS CENTER WRANGLER DR. & BELTLINE RD. COPPELL, TX PROJECT NO.: 090:' ~05034 REPORT NO.: 1120 51 DATE OF SERVICE: Z/01/97 AUTHORIZATION: REPORT DATE: 2/:)6/97 SERVICES: Water Injection Inspection. REPORT OF INSPECTION On this date, a representative arrived on site as Water Injection Inspection. See attached report for result~ inspection. to perform a of the Time: 7:00 am - 5:00 pm Technician: David King Technician Report Distribution: (1) Lincoln Property Co. (1) BUTLER CONSTRUCT[ON [NCORP. (1) BROCKETT-i)AV[S-DRAKE, [NC. (1) THE CITY OF COPPELL / 1099 ~ O~ ~m ~ r~ fall with~ t~ ~ovd of ~ply ~y tO ~ s~ple :ken, B.S. 'oject Manager ed except in imil~' I~reductS. LABS TECN IIGLGI, I ES IBIC LINCOLN PROPERTY CO. Project Na:0903605034 Service Date:02/01/97 2575 Lone Star Drive · P.O. Box 224227 · Dallas, Texas 75222 (214) 631-2700 s Fax (214) 920-18!11 of MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES, IN( On February 1, 1997 a representative injection of water into the building subgrade for compliance with project speci was observed. of rigs probes (ea) Number 1. Injection depth intervals marked on rig. 2. Surfactant added to each load. 3. Injection pressure maintained between 50 and 200 PSI. 4. Probes forced downward in 12 to 18 inch intervals until refusal. 5. Total depth required on injection 10 feet. 6. Spacing for injection @ a five feet maximum. For explanation of any NO response, see REMARKS below. Additional injection for Building A at the request of GEOTECH Lab Maxil attached map. TIME: 7:00 am to 5:00 pm Report N°: 112061 Page 2 of 2 ,.' observed the pressure Technologies Inc. See except in full without the approvei etters and reporte apply only to the NO NO YES YES Our letters and re,aorta are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shell not be reproduce of the te~tJng laboratory. The u~e of our name mu~t receive prior written approval of Maxim Technologies, Inc. sample tested and/or inspected and are not indicative of the quantity of aoparectlv identical or similar products. Technician: David King tilding I A ;mber I fieations. The following rnz