Northlake 635(2)-LR 970109Ma~
TECHNOLOGIES INC
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
SERVICES:
REPORT OF
WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Lincoln Property Co.
500 N. AKARD, SUITE 300
ATTN: LARRY MOON
Dallas, TX 7'5201
COPPELL BUSINESS CENTER
WRANGLER DR. & BELTLINE RD.
COPPELL, TX
PROJECT NO.: 0903
REPORT NO.: 1105(
DATE OF SERVICE: 1~'
AUTHORIZATION:
REPORT DATE: 1/(
PERFORM WATER INJECTION INSPECTION.
REPORT OF INSPECTION
ON THIS DATE, A MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVED
SCHEDULED TO PERFORM A WATER INJECTION INSPECTION AS SC~ED(
ATTACHED REPORT FOR RESULTS OF TRE INSPECTION.
TECHNICIAN TIME: START 6:30AM STOP 6:30PM
Technician: Daniel Hernandez
Technician
m Tech. · Southwestern Labs
rS Lone St,,r Dr. · P.O. Box 224227
Dallas, Texas 75222
Telephone: (214) 631-2700
FAX: (214) 920-1891
505034
~5
:/30/96
,9/97
)N SITE AS
· ~ED. SEE
Report Distribution: (1) L~ncoLn Property Co.
(1) BUTLER CONSTRUCTZON ]NCORP.
C1) BROCI~ETT-DAVZS-DRA~E, [NC.
(1) THE CITY OF COFPELL
(1) THE CZTY OF COPPELL
P::oject
Manager
~l)tdy only to t~m ~mlx~ te~tad A, vd/~c in~ed, ~ .re not ~nd~cst~ve m
/
~OUTHWESTERN LABS
TECHNOLOelIS INC
LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY
Project Nn:0903605034
Service Date: 12/30/96
2575 Lone Star Drive · P.O. Box 224227 · Dallal Texa. 75222
(214) 631-2700 · Fax (214) 920-189
REPORT OF
WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Report N°: 110505
Page 2
On December 30, 1996, a representative of MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. c
injection of water into the building subgrade for compliance with project specific
observed.
2.
3.
4.
4
2
bserved the pressure
ations. The following was
Injection depth intervals marked on rig.
Surfactant added to each load.
Injection pressure maintained at 50 PSI.
Probes forced downward in 12 to 18 inch intervals until
refusal.
Total depth required on injection 10 feet.
Spacing for injection @ a five feet maximum.
REMARKS: SEE ATTACHED DIAGRAM
TIME: 6:30 am to 6:30 pm
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be repro;
approval of the testing laboratory. The use of our name must receive prior written approval of Maxim Technolog
only to the sample tested and/or inspected and are not indicative of the quantity of epparantly identical or similar
A
uced except in full without the
es. Inc. Letters and reporr~ apply
;educts.