Northlake 635(2)-LR 970108TECHNOLOGIES INC
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
SERVICES:
REPORT OF
WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Lincoln Property Co.
SO0 N. AKARD, SUITE 300
ATTN: LARRY MOON
Dallas, TX 75201
COPPELL BUSINESS CENTER
WRANGLER DR. & BELTLINE RD.
COPPELL~ TX
PROJECT NO.: 0903
REPORT NO.: 1096;
DATE OF SERVICE: 1',
AUTHORIZATION:
REPORT DATE:
PERFORM WATER INJECTION INSPECTION.
REPORT OF INSPECTION
ON THIS DATE, A MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES REPRESENTATIVE PERFORME£
INJECTION INSPECTION. SEE RESULT OF THIS TEST IS ATTACHED.
Technician: Daniel Hernandez
Technician
Report Distribution: (1) L~ncoLn Property Co.
(1) BUTLER CO~STRUCT[OIJ ZNCORP.
(1) BROCEETT-OAVIS-DRAEE, [NC.
(1) THE CiTY OF COPPELL
C1) THE CiTY OF COPPELL
lOgg DY
Tech. · Sou~westem Labs
Lone Star Dr. · P.O. Box 224227
D~lla8, TexM 75222
Telephone: (214) 631-2700
FAX: (214) 920-1891
505034
,5
/lO/9~
8/97
A WATER
STERN LABS
.S. Ch.E.
M~Iy Mdy to the W te4~cl m~d/M iflm~'ted, md Me no( mmcmve M me quammee M elN~renuy mermcm M ~mif proau~.
TIECHNOLQ,81ES INC
LINCOL~ PROPI~TY COMP~
Project :0903605034
Service Date: 10/09/96
2575 Lone Stm* Ddve · P.O. Box 224227 · D-Jla ~. Tex.s 75222_
(214} 631-2700 · Fix (214) 920-18~)1
REPORT OF
WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Repo~: 109685
Page :2
On December 10, 1996, a representative of MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
injection of water into the building subgrade for compliance with project specifi
observed.
2.
3.
4.
Injection depth intervals marked on rig.
Surfactant added to each load.
Injection pressure maintained at 50 PSI.
Probes forced downward in 12 to 15 inch intervals until
refusal.
Total depth required on injection 10 feet.
Spacing for injection @ a five feet maximum.
REMARKS: SEE ATTACHED DIAGRAM.
TIME: 6:30 am to 6:00 pm
Our lette~ and report~ me for the exclueive ue· of the cdient to wham they ere addree~ed end shall naif be repro
· ppcovd of ~he re·ting liboretc~/. The uae of our nmne mu~ receive prim written q)provd of Mmdm Technologi
anly to the ·mnple teeted and/or inspected ~nd are not indiemtJve of the qum~ity of ~ppmee~ly idenCic~ or simile
,bse, rved the pressure
~tions. The following was
Jr, sd except in full without the
m, Ino. La*tm, .nd regatta ~
wodu~--I~.
SO'30'O0"W
64.74'
/
-:; . .' , .... ' .. .. . .,-~ .,. '..:'-:. ,;'.' ,,~,. ,.~-~ -~ -...
....... "" '" I~'': - - 1, '": ~::'
~c;'.;~" :-".-;- ' ;%; _~?';?:.- l""'i' :-: ~ ,. ;;- .}' -
.. ..,~ .. ,..~,.~;.,.;.;,.. lC.- ~. ':~ ,:.'- ,
~,~ . . " ;-~"T ""': ~ "
; i~' -/-.~ ~"'
· ~. . . ,.'..,~.~o.-,'.' · o~:..~-...,..-;~,- ..:- ~..'~.
',,
TICNNOLOIIii INC
LINCOLN PROPERTY COlVIPANY
Project :0903605034
Service Date: 10/09/96
257S Lone $~r D~ve · P.O. Box 224227 ·
(214! 831-2700 _. F~x (214! 920-18~)1
REPORT OF
WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Report: 109685
Page 3
On December 10, 1996, a representative of MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. c
injection of water into the building subgrade for compliance with project specifit
observed.
1. Injection depth intervals marked on rig.
2. Surfactant added to each load.
3. Injection pressure maintained at 50 PSI.
4. Probes forced downward in 12 to 18 inch intervals until
5. Total depth required on injection 10 feet.
6. Spacing for injection @ a five feet maximum.
R~: SEE ATTACI-I~13 DIAGRAM.
TllVIE: 6:30 am to 6:00 pm
O~ btter8 ~nd repo~ m foe ~he &xdu~ve u~e of I~e cdi~nt ~o whom ~,/iwe Iddl'e~Nd ~nd d~ll not ~ ~
q)peov,d of the t~ting Idx~,~or~. The u~e of oul' n~me mu~t Nc~ve pfioe wrimm q)p~ovd of Mixim Tadmobgi~
ordv to 'the ~mpie ~e~ced ~ndloe inq)eo~d mid ~ n~t indir.~Jve of th~ quality of q)p~mntlV identie, i os' .imibr
,bserved the pressure
ations. The following was
· I
£J
[J
£J
~J
rj