Northlake 635(2)-LR 961218 (3)TECHNOLOGIES INC
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
SERVICES:
REPORT OF
WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Lincoln Property Co.
500 N. AKARD, SUITE 300
ATTN: LARRY MOON
Dallas, TX 75201
COPPELL BUSINESS CENTER
WRANGLER DR. & BELTLINE RD.
COPPELL, TX
PROJECT NO.: 0903
REPORT NO.: 1099]
DATE OF SERVICE: 1'~
AUTHORIZATION:
REPORT DATE: 12/]
PERFORM WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
REPORT OF INSPECTION
ON THIS DATE, A MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVED C
SCHEDULED TO PERFORM A WATER INJECTION INSPECTION. SEE AT~
RESULTS OF THE INSPECTION.
TIME:6:30A TO 4:30P
Technician: Daniel Hernandez
Technician
Tech. · Southwestem Labs
Lone Star Dr. · P.O. Box 224227
Oella8, Texas 75222
Telephone: (214) 631-2700
FAX: (214) 920-1891
505034
,6
/14/96
,8/96
SITE AS
~CHED REPORT FOR
Report Distribution: (1) Lincotn Property Co.
(1) BUTLER CONSTRUCT]ON ]NCORP.
(1) BROCKETT-DAVI$-DRAKE, ]NC.
(1) THE CITY OF COPPELL
(1) THE CTTY OF COPPELL ..O4ect_.,
Manager
epply only to the simple telted ~nd/or ~nlpected, and itl not ~ndlclt~vl of ~ ClUltttltlll o~ I~&-er~rf Kze~u~ o~ ~, 4,~ m ·
1
~......--'~./~/a,~np~l~acken, S.S. Ch.E.
TICHNOLOIIll INC
LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY
Project Nu:0903605034
Service Date: 12/14/96
2575 Lone Star Drive · P.O. Box 224227 · Dallas
(214) 631-2700 · Fax (214) 920-189
REPORT OF
WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
,Texas 75222
eport N~: 109916
P~ge 2
On December 14,1996, a representative of MAXIM TE HNOLO(HES, INC. o1~
injection of water into the building subgrade for compliance with project specific
observed.
1. Injection depth intervals marked on rig.
2. Surfactant added to each load. Y
3. Injection pressure maintained at 50 PSI. Y
4. Probes forced downward in 12 to 18 inch intervals until Y
refusal.
5. Total depth required on injection 10 feet. Y
6. Spacing for injection @ a five feet maximum. Y
RF_lVlARKS: See attached drawing.
TIME: 6:30 am to 4:30 pm
Our la<tm and repcxl~ are for the exclusive use of the dient to whom they ire edclra4eed ~ sbe# not be rel~rodu
aplxovd of the testing liboratmy. The u~e of our n~rns must receive pdor written i4~xovd of Maxim Technologic
only to the ~arnide teated .nd/or inspected and are not indicative of the quantity of ~p~)orentiy identic4d or ~imilar
served the pressure
ttions. The following was
0
=ed except in full without the
Inc. Lettem .nd reporm apply
roduct..
L-