Northlake 635(2)-LR 961216TECHNOLOGIES INC
CUENT:
L£ncoln Property Co.
500 N. AF~%RD, SUITE 300
ATTN: LARRY MOON
Dallas, TX 75201
PROJECT:
25~
REPORT OF
WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
COPPELL BUSINESS CENTER
WRANGLER DR. & BELTLINE RD.
COPPELL, TX
SERVICES: PERFORM WATER INJECTION INSPECTION.
ON THIS DATE,
INSPECTION.
Technician: Daniel Hernandez
Technician
Report Distribu~on: (1) Lincotn Property Co.
(1) BUTLER CONSTRUCTION INCO~P.
(1) BROCKETT-DAVIS-DRAK:E, INC.
(1) THE CITY OF COPPELL
(1) THE CITY OF COPPELL
lOge DY
PROJECT NO.: 09031
REPORT NO.: 1097E
DATE OF SERVICE: 12
AUTHORIZATION:
REPORT DATE: 12/1
REPORT OF INSPECTION
MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES REPRESENTATIVE PERFORMED
SEE ATTACHED REPORT FOR RESULTS FOR RESULTS OP
~ Tech. ·Southwestem Labs
'5 Lone Star Dr. · P.O. Box 224227
Dellae, Texe, 75222
Telephone: (214) 631-2700
FAX: (214) 920-1891
~05034
4
~11/9G
WATER INJECTION
THE INSPECTION.
MAXIM TEC ..SOU WE ERN LABS
PtfoJect Manager
TECNNQLOSIES INC
LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY
Project N°:0903605034
Service Date: 12/11/96
2575 Lone Star Drive * P.O. Box 224227 · Datla~l~ Texu 75222
(214} 531-2700 · F~ (214) 920-18'~ '
REPORT OF
WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Report :109764.
Page 2
On December 11, 1996, a representative of MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
injection of water into the building subgrade for compliance with project specific
observed.
2.
3.
4.
,bserved the pressure
ations. The following was
Injection depth intervals marked on rig.
Surfactant added to each load.
Injection pressure maintained at 50 PSI.
Probes forced downward in 12 to 18 inch intervals until
Total depth required on injection 10 feet.
Spacing for injection @ a five feet maximum.
RE~~: SFF ATTACHED DIAGRAM.
TIME: 6:30 am to 7:00 pm
Our lettere and reporta are for the exclueive uae of the c~ent to whom they are addre~ed and eha# not be relxoc~
a~Orovd of the t~'dng I~boratoW. The u~e of our n~ne mu~t receive Ixior written ~olxovd of Mmdrn Technoiogi,
only to the sample ta~ted ,ndl,r iml~ected ~nd ,re not indicative of the quantity of apparently identical or
C(1)
w~d except in full without the
m. Inc. Letter, and reoort, aoply
~oduct,.
/ / //!
YICH NOLOIIIES INC
LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY
Project N~:0903605034
Service Date: 12/11/96
2575 Lone Star Ddv® · P.O. Box 224227 · DIdla B, Texa, 75222
(214) 631-2700 * Fax (214) 920-18:11
REPORT OF
WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Report: 109764
Page 3
On December 11, 1996, a representative of MAXIM TECHNOLOGIF_.S, INC. (,bserved the pressure
injection of water into the building subgrade for compliance with project specifi~ ~ttions. The following was
observed.
1. Injection depth intervals marked on rig. } IO
2. Surfactant added to each load.
3. Injection pressure maintained at 50 PSI.
4. Probes forced downward in 12 to 18 inch intervals until 'F_S
refusal.
5. Total depth required on injection 10 feet. 'F_,S
6. Spacing for injection @ a five feet maximum.
S~ ATrACI-I~,D DIAGRAM.
TIME: 6:30 am to 7:00 pm
Our I~ttm ~nd r~m~ ~re for the ~xol~ive ~e of ~he ~li~t to whom they ~re ~ldr~sed ~1 ah,a! not b~ r~'od, i¢~1 exert in full without the
~.ov,a of the t~tin~ I~ao~toeV. lhe t~e of our nm mu~t r~ive ~io*
only to the sample tested and/or inspected ~nd ara not indlc~tive of the quantity of a;)parontly idonticai or similar ~oduct..
..!