Park Meadow-LR 851119Maxim Engineers Inc. 2342 Fabens
Geotechnical P,O. Box 59902
Materials Testing Dallas, Texas 75229
Con ......... m~4) ,~A~ -~.r r.
General Report
m
m
Report Date
To
Project
Iclentification
Method of Test
11/19/85 ~mpleDa~ 11/13/85 (Scheduled)
Coppell Municipal Utility District c/o Pierce-Lunsford Associates, Inc.
Park Meadow II - Coppell, Texas
Standby Time
Results
Time Maxim Engineers, Inc. scheduled for service: l:O0 p.m.
Type of service scheduled: In-Place Density Tests
Reason for cancellation: Contractor not prepared for tests.
Time left lab:
Time arrived at job:
Time left job:
Time returned lab:
Total standbY time:
12:30 p.m.
l:O0 p.m.
1:30 p.m.
2:00 p.m.
1 1/2 hours
3155-411026
Technician: R.E.D.
TN
Distribution:
Coppell Municipal Utility District c/° Pierce-Lunsford Associates,
Inc. - Jeff Hawkins
Coppell Municipal Utility District c/o Pierce-Lunsford Associates,
Inc. - Craig Goodpastor
Ginn, Inc. - Steve Pennington
Wiseco Land Development - Tom Wise
American Developers & Contractors - Glen Hemphill
Maxim Engineers, Inc.
Maxim Engine. ers Inc.
Geot6~¢h nical
Materials Testing
Consultants
2342 Fabens
P.O, Box 59902
Dallas, Texas 75229
(214) 247-7575
m
m
In-Place Density of Soil
Report Date 11/19/85
Sample Date
Page 1
11/11/85
Coppell Municipal Utility District c/o Pierce-Lunsford Associates, Inc.
Project
Park Meadow II - Coppell, Texas
Material
1. Brown and light brown sandy clay with minimal
stones
2. Brown clayey sand with clay balls and gravel
Maximum Dry Density Optimum Moisture
(Lbs./Cu,Ft.) (Percent)
lO1.3 16.2
125.1 10.3
Density Test Methods:
ASTM D 2922 and D 3017
Method of Compaction:
ASTM D 698
et,
0
z
Test Matedal
No. No.
k, 23 2
% 24 2
25 2
~ 26 2
Dry
Lift Location Den~/
I I.bs./Cu,Ft.
Finished Waterline, Moore Rd., 100' ll2.0
grade north of Parkway Blvd.
Finished Waterline, Moore Rd., 125' 106.3
grade north of Parkway Blvd.
Finished Waterline, Moore Rd., south
grade end of Moore Rd., lot 14
120.8
Finished Waterline, Moore Rd., lot 17 106.5
Waterline, Moore Rd., lot 20 106.0
Waterline, Moore Rd., lot 23 97.5
Waterline, Moore Rd., lot 23 87.3
Waterline, Moore Rd., lot 9 102.5
Moisture Content
(%)
10.2
13.3
grade'
27 2 1st
X~ 28 1 1st
~ 29 1 1st
30 .1 1st
8.0
13.3
18.9
18.5
Percent (%) of
I Maximum Dry Density
90.0
96.6
101.0
*Does not meet project specifications for moisture content.
**Does not meet project specifications for dry density.
Remarks and/or Distribution
Maxim Engineers, Inc. Reviewed by: ~
Maxim Engineers Inc,
Geote'chnical
Materials Testing
Consultants
2342 Fabens
P.O. Box 59902
Dallas, Texas 75229
(214) 247-7575
m
m
In-Place Density of Soil
Report Date Sample Date Pa ge 2
11/19/85 11/11/85
To
Project
Park Meadow II -Coppell, Texas
Material
Coppell Municipal Utility District c/o Pierce-Lunsford Associates, Inc.
Maximum Dry Density Optimum Moisture
(Lbs./Cu. Ft.) (P~'cent)
1. Brown and light brown sandy clay with minimal
stones
2. Brown clayey sand.with clay balls and gravel
lO1.3 16.2
125.1 10.3
Density Test Methods:
Test Material
No. No.
r.~ 31 1
~ 32 i
o,,u D ou,7
Location
Lift
1st
Finished
grade
~33 1 Finished
grade
34 1 Finished
grade
35 1 Finished
grade
~ 36 1 Finished
grade
'x37 1
x% 38 1
Method of Compaction:
Lbs./Cu.R.
Moisture Content Percent (%) M
(%) I M~imum Dry Density
Waterline, Moore Rd., lot 2
Waterline, Still Forest Rd.
atlot 12
Waterline, Still Forest Rd.
at lot 3
Waterline, Still Forest Rd.
at lot 6
Waterline, Still Forest Rd.
.at lot 9
Waterline, Still Forest Rd.
at lot 12
Finished Waterline, Clear Haven at lot
subgrade 4
Finished Waterline, Clear Haven at lot
subgrade 9
102.5
103.8
lOl.1
102.5
102.8 17.7 lO1.5
lll.O 16.2 109.5
102.8 ~ lO1.4
105.3 19.2 103.8
103.3 17.1 101.9
95.8 ~ 94.5
*Does not meet 3roject specifications for moisture content.
Remarks and/or Distribution
Maxim Engineers, Inc. Reviewed by: ~
Maxim Engineers Inc. 2342 Fabens
Geote~hnical ~ P.O. Box 59902
Materials Testing Dallas, Texas 75229
Consultants (214) 247-7575
m
m
In-Place Density of Soil
noport Det® 11/19/85
San~e Date
Page 3
1 l/11/85
To
Coppell. Municipal Utility District c/o Pierce-Lunsford Associates, Inc.
Project
Park Meadow II - Coppell, Texas
Material
1. Brown and light brown sandy clay with minimal
stones
2. Brown clayey sand with clay balls and gravel
Maximum Dry Density
(Lb~./Cu. Ft.)
lO1.3
125.1
Optimum Moisture
(Percent)
16.2
10.3
Density Test Methods:
ASTM D 2922 and D 3017
Method of Compaction: ASTM D 698
Test
NO.
39
~'~ 40
~" 42
<X~ 43
D~
Mstedal Lift Location D~.~ MoistureContent Percent(%)~
No. I Lbs./Cu. Ft. I (%) 1 M~imum D~ Den~ty
1 Finished Waterline, Clear Haven at 98.3 ~2~1'~ 96.9
subgrade lot 12'
1 Finished Waterline, Clear Haven at 111.0 15.7 109.5
subgrade lot 7
1 Finished Waterline, Parkview Place at 97.5 3.~
96.2
subgrade lot 6
~ 95.2
Finished Waterline, Parkview Place at
subgrade lot 8
Finished Waterline, Moore Road at lot
subgrade 23
96.5
lll.3 15.0 109.8
*Does not meet project specifications for moisture content.
~marks ~m Dis~b~
Technician: J.M. 3155-411026
TN
Coppell Municipal Utility District c/o Pierce-Lunsford Associates,
Inc. - Jeff Hawkins
Coppell Municipal Utility District c/o Pierce-Lunsford Associates,
Inc. - Craig Goodpastor Wiseco Land Development - Tom Wise
Ginn, Inc. - Steve Pennington~-~ American Developers & Contractorsm~.- Glen Hemphill
M~im Engin~rs, Inc. Re~ by: rT~