Loading...
Park, Peter-CS 970204 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Mr. Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E. Assistant CiW Manager / CiW Engineer CiW of Coppell 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019 Subject: Revisions and Additional Data Requests 18.9 acre Sandy Lake Road Property Dear Mr. Griffin: We have addressed the issues raised during our meeting with you on January 23, 1997 regarding the project cited above. These issues relate to desired revisions to the Grading Plan and to additional data pertaining to hydraulic analyses for Denton Creek. These items are discussed individually below. Grading Plan Revisions The development located on the opposite side of Sandy Lake Road from our project site intends to discharge storm water to the existing draw through the central portion of the property. According to the plans we reviewed in your office, 2 - 30 inch diameter storm sewer pipes will discharge into the draw just north of Sandy Lake Road. Contrary to the preliminary plans for the Sandy Lake Road expansion which we received from Dallas County, this storm sewer outlet will be permanent. We have therefore made provision to connect to and extend these pipes through our site to empty into Denton Creek on the north side of the property. A revised Grading Plan illustrating this addition is enclosed. We would like Dallas County to consider connecting the storm sewer system from the southern development into the system proposed for Sandy Lake Road. If you so desire, we can pose this question to Dallas County. Please let us know how you would like to proceed in this regard. If connection to the Sandy Lake Road system is not feasible, we will install the pipes as shown at the time of fill placement for the project site. Concern was also expressed that the cut slope in the southeastern portion of the property begins too close to the proposed right-of-way such that transition to the proposed grade will be steeper than a 4:1 slope. This cut slope has been moved about 10 feet further north into the property to provide for the slope transition to the proposed right-of-way grade. Other cut slopes have been adjusted such that the storage volume is preserved. These modifications are shown on the provided Grading Plan. Three NorthPark / 8800 N. Central Expwy. / Suite 300 / Dallas, Texas 75231 / (214) 739-4741 Mr. Griffin 2..'4.."97 Page 2 You mentioned some revisions that may be necessary to the planned site layout as previously submitted. The previous plan was intended only to give a general idea for the planned single family residential land use. Details of the site plan will be coordinated with your office to ensure City of Coppell (City) requirements are met. This will be pursued once the floodplain reclamation permitting has been accomplished Denton Creek Hydraulic Analyses Denton Creek is analyzed for the conditions where the project area is not controlled by backwater from the Elm Fork of the Trinity River. A total of 10 cross sections were derived from the Corps of Engineers (CoE) aerial topographic mapping assembled for the Elm Fork Feasibility Study. The sections are shown on the enclosed Cross Section Location Map. In addition, two sections are repeated at locations 10 feet downstream and 10 feet upstream of the subject property to provide transition to the area to be modified. Approximations are necessary for the channel of Denton Creek since the channel bottom is not portrayed on the aerial topographic mapping. The flow line elevations at the section locations are determined from the stream bed profile within the Flood Insurance Study report. Side slopes of 2:1 are then assumed for the channel up to the banks determined from the aerial topography. The primary purpose of these hydraulic analyses is for comparison of water surface elevations along Denton Creek for existing and proposed floodplain conditions as related to reclamation for the Sandy Lake Road Property. Effective flow limits for these sections and other hydraulic parameters are subject to engineering judgment. Thus, the results of these preliminary analyses may differ significantly from the results of other studies or reference materials. Denton Creek hydraulics are analyzed for four different discharges. A discharge of 2000 cfs is used as a typical release rate from Grapevine Lake upstream, as per the CoE. The ultimate development 2-year and 100-year discharges for Denton Creek are determined from the City-Wi¢le Storm Water Management Stucly by Albert H. Halff Associates, Inc. (January 1991). These are determined to be 7432 cfs for the 2-year and 23,083 cfs for the I00-year. A regression analysis is performed using these two values in order to estimate a 10-year ultimate development discharge of 13,871 cfs. Manning's "n" values are also determined from the Halff Study as 0.045 for the overbanks and 0.040 for the channel. For the four discharges mentioned above, two different starting conditions are considered. A normal depth assumption is used as a condition for each of the discharges. Secondly, conditions on the Elm Fork are assumed to dictate the starting condition for Denton Creek. For the lake release, the 2-year ultimate and 10-year ultimate discharges the normal water level for the Elm Fork is used as a starting condition. This is equal to elevation 431.0, which is the crest elevation for the Carrollton Dam located a short distance downstream on the Elm Fork. For the 100-year ultimate discharge on Denton Creek, the 10-year ultimate water surface elevation on the Elm Fork is used as a starting condition. This elevation is determined from the CoE HEC-2 Feasibility Model. Mr. Griffin 2."4.-'97 Page $ The scenarios described above are evaluated using the HEC-2 computer program for both existing and proposed floodplain conditions. The only differences between the existing and proposed conditions are the modifications in the right overbank for development of the Sandy Lake Road Property. For all four discharges, the difference in water surface elevation at the downstream end of the subject property due to starting condition is negligible, as shown in the output tables of the included HEC-2 models. Thus, further discussions and comparisons address only the starting condition dictated by the Elm Fork. A comparison table is included which illustrates the water surface elevations at the cross section locations for the four discharges analyzed. Some increases of proposed over existing are noted at the downstream end of the project site, at sections 23+70 and 26+I0. For all other locations, the proposed yields water surface elevations less than or equal to the existing conditions. No increases in water surface elevation occur upstream of the Sandy Lake Road Property due to the proposed modifications for any of the discharges analyzed herein. Summary Modifications have been made to the Grading Plan based on the concerns expressed in our previous meeting. Hydraulic analyses have been performed for Denton Creek to assess the impact of the project development. Results indicate development of the Sandy Lake Road Property will have negligible impact on the water surface elevations of Denton Creek. The project has previously been illustrated to have negligible impact on the water surface elevations of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River. We hope this fulfills all of the City's requirements for this project and that City approval will be quickly forthcoming. If you have any questions or would like to discuss these results further, please let us know. Sincerely, NATHAN D. MAIER CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Mark D. Walter, P.E. enclosures COMPARISON OF DENTON CREEK WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS 18.9 acre Sandy Lake Road Property Lake Release 2-Yr Ultimate 10-Yr Ultimate 100-Yr Ultimate Section Exist I Prop Exist Prop Exist Prop Exist Prop Remarks 13+30 435.70 435.70 440.44 440.44 441.57 441.57 443.57 443.57 23+60 437.38 437.38 442.16 442.16 444.02 444.02 445.16 445.16 23+70 437.39 437.50 442.19 443.04 444.06 444.39 445.18 445.33 Dnstrm End of Property 26+ 10 437.63 437.62 443.21 443.20 444.47 444.49 445.38 445.42 31 +40 437.75 437.67 443.43 443.23 444.74 444.57 445.65 445.52 34+20 437.98 437.79 443.61 443.40 444.83 444.69 445.74 445.64 38+90 438.26 437.52 443.86 443.32, 445.03 444.72 445.94 445.71 44+20 439.24 438.80 444.12 443.86 445.28 445.06 446.23 446.07 Upstrm End of Property 44+30 439.25 438.81 444.13 443.88 445.29 445.08 446.25 446.09 47 + 80 439.61 439.23 443.97 443.88 446.19 446.19 446.97 446.96