ST9801-LR001003 9200 King Arthur Drive
Dallas, Texas 75247-3610
Phone 214/631-4372 Fax 214/631-4380
Mr. Kenneth Griffm, P.E.
City of Coppell
255 Parkway Boulevard
Post Office Box 478
Coppell, Texas 75019-4409
Project No.:
Project:
Location:
Report No.:
1520COP03
Coppell Road Paving & Drainage
Paving Subgrade
120
RESULTS OF LIME TREATED BASE FIELD GRADATIONS
TEST DATE
NO.
29 10/03/00
30 10/03/00
PETEST
OF
TEST
NUMBER
TEST LOCATION LIFT/ PERCENT PERCENT
DEPTH PASSING PASSING
13/4" No. 4
SIEVE SIEVE
Bike Path @ Coppell Rd. at Sta. 15+00
Bike Path @ Coppell Rd. at Sta. 12+00
Grade 100% 65.6%
Grade 100% 67.0%
TESTS PERFORMED BY: Mohammed Kashem
REMARKS:
DISTRIBUTION: City of Coppell - Larry Davis
SIGNED
OF 1
OUR LETTERS AND REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE CLIENT 70 WHOM THEY ARE ADDRESSED, AND APPLY ONLY TO ~ SAMPLES TESTED.
TEST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATI~rE OF TI~ QUALITY OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR SAMPLES
THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF STANTECH
9200 King Arthur Ddve
Dallas, Texas 75247-3610
Phone 214/631-4372 Fax 214/631-4380
Mr. Kenneth Griffin, P.E.
City of Coppell
255 Parkway Boulevard
Post Office Box 478
Coppell, Texas 75019-4409
Project No.:
Project:
Location:
Report No.:
1520COP03
Coppell Road Paving & Drainage
Paving Subgrade
122
RESULTS OF LIME TREATED BASE FIELD GRADATIONS
TEST DATE
NO.
31 10/03/00
32 10/03/00
33 10/03/00
PETEST
OF
TEST
NUMBER
TEST LOCATION LIFT/ PERCENT PERCENT
DEPTH PASSING PASSING
I 3/4" No. 4
SIEVE SIEVE
Bike Path @ Coppell Rd. at Sta. 9+00
Bike Path @ Coppell Rd. at Sta. 6+00
Bike Path @ Coppell Rd. at Sta. 3+00
Grade 100% 65.8%
Grade 100% 66.0%
Grade 100% 65.0%
TESTS PERFORMED BY: Mohammed Kashem
REMARKS:
DISTRIBUTION: City of Coppell - Larry Davis
TEST METHODS: TEX 101E ~..aa~,_,~-~.x~~ 10- 5- OV
SIGNED ,
PAGE 1 OF 1
OUR LETTERS A":D REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE CLIENT TO WHOM THEY ARE ADDRESSED, AND APPLY ONLY TO THE SAMPLES TESTED.
TEST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITY OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR SAMPLES
THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF STANTECH
9200 King Arthur Drive
Dallas, Texa,~ 75247-3610
Phone 214/6314372 Fax 214/631-4380
Mr. Kenneth Griffin, P.E.
City of Coppell
255 Parkway Boulevard
Post Office Box 478
Coppell, Texas 750194409
Project No.:
Project:
Location:
Report No.:
1520COP03
Coppell Road Paving & Drainage
Lime Treated Paving Subgrade
119
RESULTS OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
TEST DATE RETEST
NO. OF
TEST
NUMBER
122 10/03/00
123 10/03/00
TEST LOCATION LIFT/ PROCTOR
DEPTH TEST
NO.
Bike Path @ Coppell Rd. at Sta. 17+50
Bike Path @ Coppell Rd. at Sta. 20+25
FIELD FIELD PERCENT
DENSITY MOISTURE OF
PCF % SPECIFIED
COMPACTION
Grade 7093 107.4 16.8 97.2
Grade 7093 107.0 19.0 96.8
TESTS PERFORMED BY: M. Kashem
REMARKS:
PROCTOR NO.: 7093 - 110.5 pcf @ 16.5% Moisture
SPECIFICATION: 95% Compaction @ Optimum +
DISTRIBUTION: City of Coppell - Larry Davis
TEST METHODS: ASTM D 2922, D 3017, D 1558, D2167 OR D 2937
SIGNED
PAGE 1 OF 1
THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT 1N FULL WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF STANTECH
Fqaeerial CL
9200 King Arthur Drive
Dallas, Texas 75247-3610
Phone 214/6314372 Fax 214/631-4380
Mr. Kenneth Griffin, P.E.
City of Coppell
255 Parkway Boulevard
Post Office Box 478
Coppell, Texas 75019-4409
P roj ect No.:
Project:
Location:
Report No.:
1520COP03
Coppell Road Paving & Drainage
Lime Treated Paving Subgrade
121
RESULTS OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
TEST DATE RETEST TEST LOCATION
NO. OF
TEST
NUMBER
124 10/03/00
125 10/03/00
LIFT/ PROCTOR FIELD FIELD PERCENT
DEPTH TEST DENSITY MOISTURE OF
NO. PCF % SPECIFIED
COMPACTION
Bike Path @ Coppell Rd. at Sta. 15+00
Bike Path @ Coppell Rd. at Sta. 12+00
Grade 7093 105.4 19.6 95.4
Grade 7093 107.2 18.4 97.0
TESTS PERFORMED BY: M. Kashem
REMARKS:
PROCTOR NO.: 7093 - 110.5 pcf @ 16.5% Moisture
SPECIFICATION: 95% Compaction @ Optimum +
DISTRIBUTION: City of Coppell - Larry Davis
TEST METHODS: ASTM D 2922, D 3017, D 1558, D2167 OR D 2937
SIGNED
OUR LETTERS AND REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE CLIENT TO WHOM THEY ARE ADDRESSED, AND APPLY ONLy TO THE SAMPLES TESTED.
TEST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITY OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR SAMELEg
THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE KEPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF STANTECH