Park West CC(4)-LR 9401201 ~~rracon
CONSULTANTS, INC.
12801 Stemmons Freeway, Suite 907
Dallas, Texas 75234
(214) 243-8838 Fax (214) 243-4014
January 20, 1994
Gerald W. Finn, P.E.
Clement B. Bommarito, PE.
Lewis Daniel Israel, P.E.
Eric J. Cleveland, P.E.
Dupey Management Corporation
9015 Sterling Street
Irving, Texas 75063
Attn: Mr. Robert McCann
Re: M J Designs Distribution Center
Coppell, Texas
lob No. 17931033
Dear Mr. McCann:
A representative of Terracon Consultants, Inc. has continued to perform earthwork observation
and testing services for the referenced project. This report covers the services performed from
January 3 to January 15, 1994. Services provided during this period consisted of performing
field density tests on compacted fill and observing water injection operations.
Clay fill is being placed in the storm sewer excavation and in the northeast parking lot. We
understand that clay fill below parking areas is to be compacted to at least 95% of it's maximum
standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D-698) at a moisture content at least 3 % above it's
optimum. Select fill is being placed in the building area and is to be compacted to at least 95
of it's maximum standard Proctor dry density at a moisture content of ±2%.
Results of the field density tests performed during this period along with two standard Proctor
tests performed on fill are attached. Tests 178 to 187 were performed on the northeast parking
lot and tests 209-214, 225-227, 248-250, and 271-273 were performed in the storm sewer
excavation. The remaining tests were performed on select fill and were referenced to the
northeast building corner which was given an assumed station of 0 south and 0 east.
Offices of The Terracon Companies, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Engineers
Arizona: Tucson ^ Colorado: Colorado Springs, Denver, Ft. Collins, Greeley, Longmont ^ Idaho: Boise ^ Illinois: Bloomington,
Chicago. Rock Island ^ Iowa: Cedar Falls, Cedar Rapids, Davenport, Des Moines, Storm Lake ^ Kansas: Lenexa, Topeka,
Wichita ^ Minnesota: St. Paul ^ Missouri: Kansas City ^ Nebraska: Lincoln, Omaha ^ Nevada: Las Vegas
^ Oklahoma: Oklahoma City, Tulsa ^ Texas: Dallas, Fort Worth ^ Utah: Salt Lake City ^ Wyoming: Cheyenne
QUALITY ENGINEERING SINCE 1965
Dupey Management Corporation
Job No. 17931033
January 20, 1994
Terracon
If you have any questions regarding this report or in need of any further services, please do not
hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
TERRA N CON',
c J. leveland, P
Project Engineer
EJC:kms
Attachments
Copy To: James, Harwick + Partners, Inc.
Mr. Mark Wolf
Albert Halff & Associates, Inc.
Mr. Dennis Chovan
Bob Moore Construction, Inc.
Mr. Phil Bell
City of Coppell
Mr. Larry Davis
2
.~,
FIELD COMPACTION REPORT
Job No. 17931033
Job Name and Location M.J. DESIGNS DISTRIBUl'ION CF3JI`II2 Date 1-15-94
Architect or Engineer JAMES HAFd~IICK + PAR'1'NIIZS INC.
Contractor BOB MOORS CONSTRUCTION INC.
Datum SITE DATiAK
Lift No. Maximum In-Place In-Place
Test Date Location or Mtl. Lab Dry Wet Water Dry Percent Comments
No. Elev. Mark Densit Densit Content Densit Co
.
205 1-5 220 - E LIFT 1 D 125
5 133
0 9
1 121
9 97
190 - S . . . .
206 1-5 280 - E
230 - S LIFT 1 D 125.5 132.1 9.5 120.6 96
207 1-5 160 - E LIFT 1 0 125.5 132
5 9.6 120.8 96
280 - S .
208 1-5 60 - E LIFT 1 D 125
5 132
0 8
8 121
3 97
230 - S . . . .
209 1-5 25 FT EAST OF LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.1 25.2 95.1 97 STORM
INLET
210 1-5 50 FT EAST OF LIFT 1 C 98.5 118.7 25.1 94.9 96 STORM
INLET
211 1-5 75 FT EAST OF LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.5 25.4 95.3 97 STORM
INLET
212 1-5 25 FT EAST OF LIFT 2 C 98.5 117.3 25.2 93.7 95 STORM
INLET
213 1-5 50 FT EAST OF LIFT 2 C 98
5 118.0 25.3 94.2 96 S70RM
INLET .
214 1-5 75 FT EAST OF LIFT 2 C 98
5 117
5 25
1 93
9 95 STORM
INLET . . . .
215 1-b 270 - S LIFT 1 D 125
5 6
132 9
5 121
0 96
30-E . . . .
216 1-b 290 - S LIFT 1 D 125
5 133
3 9.0 122.2 97
80 - E . .
217 1-b 260 - S
140 - E LIFT 1 D 125.5 132.5 9.5 121.0 96
218 1-b 290 - S LIFT 1 D 125
5 132
8 9
0 121.8 97
200 - E . . .
219 1-6 280 - S LIFT 1 D 125
5 134
2 8
6 123
5 98
290 - E . . . .
220 ~-b 260 - S LIFT 1 D 125
5 133.5 9.0 122.4 98
370 - E .
221 1-b 290 - S LIFT 1 D 125
5 132
2 9
4 120
8 96
410-E . . . .
222 1-6 260 - S LIFT 1 D 5
125 134
0 1
9 122
8 98
470 - E . . . .
223 1-b 290 - S L[FT 1 D 125
5 6
131 8.7 121.0 96
530 - E . .
224 1-6 270 - S
580-E LIFT 1 D 125.5 132.5 9.4 121.1 96
225 1-7 25 FT EAST OF LIFT 3 C 98.5 119.7 25.3 95.5 97 STORM
INLET
226 1-7 50 FT EAST OF LIFT 3 C 98.5 118.9 25.0 95.1 97 STORM
INLET
227 1-7 75 FT EAST OF LIFT 3 C 98.5 119.2 26.0 94.6 96 STORM
INLET
228 1-7 320 - S LIFT 1 D 125
5 132.2 9.5 120.7 96
30-E .
229 1-7 360 - S
10 0 - E LIFT 1 D 125.5 132.0 9.0 121.1 96
230 1-7 310 - S LIFT 1 D 125
5 133.0 9.2 121.7 97
190 - E .
231 1-7 360 - S LIFT 1 D 125
5 131
7 6
8 121
2 97
250 - E . . . .
NOTES: Densities shown: pounds per cubic foot
eater Content: Percent of dry weight
~ ~~ ~~~~
Percent Compaction: Based on maximum dry density obtained on
sample indicated by material mark.
~,
FIELD COMPACTION REPORT
Job No. 17931033
Job Name and Location M.J. DESIGNS DISTRIBUTION CENTER Date 1-15-94
Architect or Engineer JAMES, HAFdn1IQC + PARTNERS, INC.
Contractor BOB MOORE OONSTRUCTION INC.
Datum SITE DATUM
Lift No. Maximum In-Place In-Place
Test Date Location or Mtl. Lab Dry Net Water Dry Percent Comments
No. Elev. Mark Densit Densit Content Densit Co
.
232 1-7 310 - S
310-E LIFT 1 D 125.5 134.0 9.4 122.4 98
233 1-7 360 - S
380-E LIFT 1 D 125.5 133.6 9.0 122.5 98
234 1-7 310 - S
450 - E LIFT 1 D 125.5 132.5 9.2 121.3 97
235 1-7 350 - S
490 - E LIFT 1 D 125.5 131.8 9.5 120.3 96
236 1-7 320 - S
570-E LIFT 1 D 125.5 133.0 9.1 121.9 97
237 1-7 350 - S
580 - E LIFT 1 D 125.5 133.3 9.0 122.2 97
238 1-8 390 - S
20-E LIFT 1 D 125.5 133.1 9.4 121.6 97
239 1-8 440 - S
70 - E LIFT 1 D 125.5 131.0 9.0 120.1 96
240 1-8 380 - S
130-E LIFT 1 D 125.5 131.6 8.5 121.2 97
241 1-8 440 - S
210-E LIFT 1 D 125.5 132.2 9.3 120.9 96
242 1-8 380 - S
290 - E LIFT 1 0 125.5 134.0 9.6 122.2 97
243 1-8 430 - S LIFT 1 D 125
5 132
5 9
6 120
8 96
330 - E . . . .
244 1-8 380 - S
410-E LIFT 1 D 125.5 132.0 9.2 120.8 96
245 1-8 440 - S
470-E LIFT 1 D 125.5 131.3 9.5 119.9 96
246 1-8 380 - S LIFT 1 D 125
5 132
8 9
5 121
2 97
540 - E . . . .
247 1-8 440 - S LIFT 1 D 125
5 133
5 10
2 121
1 96
580-E . . . .
248 1-10 25 FT EAST OF LIFT 4 C 98.5 118.2 26.4 93.5 95 STORM
INLET
249 1-10 50 FT EAST OF LIFT 4 C 98.5 118.5 26.0 94.0 95 STORM
INLET
250 1-10 75 FT EAST OF LIFT 4 C 98.5 119.1 26.6 94.1 96 STORM
INLET
251 1-10 470 - S
20-E LIFT 1 E 125.0 133.6 9.3 122.2 98
252 1-10 520 - S LIFT 1 E 125
0 132
2 9.0 121.2 97
80-E . .
253 1-10 460 - S LIFT 1 E 125
0 133
0 9
0 122
0 98
150-E . . . .
254 1-10 520 - S LIFT 1 E 125
0 132
5 9
5 121
0 97
190 - E . . . .
255 1-10 460 - S
250-E LIFT 1 E 125.0 134.2 9.6 122.4 98
256 1-10 310 - E LIFT 1 E 125.0 132.2 9.5 120.7 97
257 1-10 460 - S LIFT 1 E 125
0 133
1 9
0 122
1 98
380 - E . . . .
258 1.10 510 - S LIFT 1 E 125
0 132
8 9
8 120
9 97
430 - E . . . .
NOTES: Densities shown: pounds per cubic foot
Hater Content: Percent of dry weight
Percent Compaction: Based on maximum dry density obtained on ~rr~con
sample indicated by material mark.
FIELD COMPACTION REPORT
Job No. 17931033
Job Name and Location M.J. DESIGNS DISTRIBUTION CII~1TII2 Date 1-15-94
Architect or Engineer JAMES, HARWICK + PARTNERS, INC.
Contractor BOB MOORE CONSTRITCTION, INC
Datum SITE DATUM
Lift No. Maximum In-Place In-Place
Test Date Location or Mtl. Lab Dry Net Water Dry Percent Comments
No. Elev. Mark Densit Densit Content Densit C
.
259 1-10 470 - S
480 - E LIFT 1 E 125.0 132.5 9.3 121.2 97
260 1-10 490 - S
550 - E L1FT 1 E 125.0 133.1 9.5 121.5 97
261 1_12 550 - S
30-E LIFT 1 E 125.0 132.6 9.2 121.4 97
262 1_12 590 - S
80-E LIFT 1 E 125.0 130.4 9.0 119.6 96
263 1-12 550 - S
15 0 - E L1FT 1 E 125.0 135.1 9.5 123.3 99
264 1-12 590 - S
230-E LIFT 1 E 125.0 133.7 9.5 122.1 98
265 1-12 540 - S
290 - E LIFT 1 E 125.0 132.5 9.0 121.5 97
266 1.12 590 - S
340-E LIFT 1 E 125.0 133.3 10.2 120.9 97
267 1_12 540 - S
410-E LIFT 1 E 125.0 132.6 9.7 120.8 97
268 1-12 590 - S
480-E LIFT 1 E 125.0 131.4 9.2 120.3 96
269 1-12 540 - S
530 - E LIFT 1 E 125.0 133.5 9.5 121.9 98
270 1_12 590 - S
580-E LIFT 1 E 125.0 132.6 9.3 121.3 97
271 1.13 50 FT EAST OF
INLET LIFT 4 C 98.5 119.3 26.5 94.3 96 STORM
272 1.13 75 FT EAST OF
INLET LIFT 4 C 98.5 120.4 26.0 95.6 97 STORM
273 1.13 100 FT EAST OF LIFT 4 C 98.5 118.9 27.2 93
5 95 STORM
INLET .
274 1-14 590 - S
310-E LIFT 2 E 125.0 132.5 9.6 120.8 97
275 1-14 580 - S
420 - E LIFT 2 E 125.0 134.8 10.4 122.1 98
276 1-14 580 - S
560 - E LIFT 2 E 125.0 132.2 9.2 121.0 97
277 1.14 520 - S
580 - E LIFT 2 E 125.0 134.0 9.6 122.2 98
278 1.14 530 - S
460 - E LIFT 2 E 125.0 133.6 9.1 122.4 98
279 1-14 520 - S
340 E LIFT 2 E 125.0 134.5 9.3 123.0 98
280 1-14 470 - S
320 - E LIFT 2 E 125.0 132.8 9.8 120.9 97
281 1.14 470 - S
440 - E LIFT 2 E 125.0 133.5 9.4 122.0 98
282 1.14 570 - S
550 - E LIFT 2 E 125.0 134.2 9.2 122.8 98
283 1-15 430 - S
330-E LIF7 2 E 125.0 133.6 9.4 122.1 96
284 1-15 430 - S
420 - E LIFT 2 E 125.0 132.2 9.2 121.0 97
285 1-15 430 - S
520 - E LIFT 2 E 125.0 134.0 9.5 122.3 98
NOTES: Densities shown: pounds per cubic foot
Hater Content: Percent of dry weight
Percent Compaction: Based on maximum dry density obtained on
~rr~can
sample indicated by material mark.
FIELD COMPACTION REPORT
Job No. 17931033
Job Name and Location M.J. DESIGNS DISTRIBUTION CENTII2 Date 1-15-94
Architect or Engineer JAMES HAFtSn1ICK + PARTNIIZS INC.
Contractor BOB MOORE CONSTRUCTION INC.
Datum SITE DATt]NI
Test
No.
Date
Location Lift No.
or
Elev.
Mtl.
Mark Maximum
Lab Dry
Densit In-Place
Net
Densit
Water
Content In-Place
Dry
Densit
Percent
Co
Comments
286 1-15 370 - S
580-E LIFT 2 E 125.0 133.4 9.1 122.2 98
287 1.15 370 - S
450 - E LIFT 2 E 125.0 134.2 9.2 122.8 98
288 1.15 360 - S
330-E LIFT 2 E 125.0 134.1 9.5 122.4 98
289 1-15 310 - S
380 - E LIFT 2 E 125.0 133.7 9.7 121.8 97
290 1-15 310 - S
460 - E LIFT 2 E 125.0 134.3 9.4 122.7 96
291 1-15 310 - S
570 - E LIFT 2 E 125.0 133.1 9.0 122.1 98
NOTES: Densities shown: pounds per cubic foot
Hater Content: Percent of dry weight ~ ~~ ~~~~
Percent Compaction: Based on maximum dry density obtained on
sample indicated by material mark.
1 f~ rr acon
13s
MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
Job No. 17931033 Date 114/94
t3o Project MT DESIGNS DTSTRTBUTION
CENTER - COPPELL, TEXAS
Source of Material OFF SITE-FORT WORTH
125
Description of Material TAN CLAYEY SAND
t20 ~~ Material Designation D
Test Method ASTM D-698 (METHOD Al
1t5
TEST RESULTS
°
o
~ Maximum Dry Density 125.5 PCF
Optimum Watec Content 10.0 °~n
u 110
.a
ATTERBERG LIMITS
~
a
N
~ 18% 13°k 5°k
0
a_
~ CURVES OF 100% SATURATION
r 100 FOR SPECIFIC GRAVITY EQUAL TO:
F-
H
80
2
N
Z .
O 2
70
.
>- 95
o
l 2.60
90
85
80
75
30
WATER CONTENT (Percent Dry Weight)
1 I'~ rr acon
135
MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
Job No. 17931033 Date t /10/94
Project M.T DESIGNS DTSTRIBUTION
13o
CENTER - COPPELL. TEXAS
Source of Material OFF SITE-FORT WORTH
125
Description of Material TAN CLAYEY SAND/SANDY
CLAY
Material Desi
nation E
t2o g
T
t M
th
d ASTM D
698
METHOD Al
es
e
o
-
(
11 s TEST RESULTS
~-
°
o
w Maximum Dry Density 125.0 PCF
Optimum Water Content 9.0 %
u uo
.a
ATTERBERG
LMTS
~,
a
los ~~ ~,_ ~L
~
c 23% 15% S%
0
a
`~ CURVES OF 100`% SATURATION
'
~,,, 100
H FOR SPECIFIC GRAVTI
Y EQUAL TO:
N 80
2
z .
w
0
2
70
>-
s .
9
0 2
60
.
90
S
S
80
75
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
WATER CONTENT (Percent Dry Weight>