Loading...
Park West CC(4)-LR 931220 1E rracon CONSULTANTS, lNG. ~28CI S*.e.'-'mo~s F-eewa],. S~e 907 Ca-'as ~e~as Y523z ~2~ 2z~-B838 Fax {74~ 243-4~'z Ge'ad W Fi-q RE C'emer: B Bomma,.to. FE. _ews Da"ne. Is-ae. PE E-ic J C~eve a"d. F.E December 20, 1993 Dupey Management Corporation 9015 Sterling Street Irving, Texas 75063 Attn: Mr. Robert McCann Re: M J Designs Distribution Center Coppell, Texas Job No. 17931033 Dear Mr. McCann: As requested, a representative of Terracon Consultants, Inc. performed earthwork observation and testing services for the referenced project. This report covers the services performed from Decelnber 1 to December 15, 1993. Services provided during this period consisted of observing stripping operations and performing field density tests, using a nuclear density gauge, on compacted clay fill. On December 1, 1993 the Distribution Center stripping operations were observed in the building pad area, including the drainage ditch located along the east side of the Phase 1 construction. Vegetation and topsoil removed from the building pad area was placed east of the proposed construction. On-site clay fill was then placed in the drainage ditch and on the north side of the building to an elevation of about 3 feet below final subgrade. Based on our Subsurface Exploration Report (see Terracon Report No. 17935076, dated October 8, 1993), clay fill is to be compacted at a density between 92 and 96% of it's maximum standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D-698) at a moisture content at least 3% above it's optimum. Offices of The Terracon Companies, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Engineers .~r.zoqa ~.:csor · C¢.oradc Coor~do Spr;'~§S. Denver F: Cc I-:,s, G-eeley. ~c.q.q:'"¢:~ · ,dado ~o,$e · ,h rois. Blcom ~.~:cn. C"'ca§c-. -'q. oc.~ 's'a:~d · Iowa. Ccaar FA, S Ceda' P. aoos Da,er, po-i Des Moi'~es S:c'm LaKe · Kansas Leqex8. TopeKa. W ch la · M ':~eso:a. S: Pau' · M~ssocr' Kansas C,W · Neu-as,<a. L qcol". Oma-a · Nevada. Las Vegas · C-: ahoma On.aroma Ci;y. Td'sa · Texas: Da!:as Foal Wot:" · U:a" Sa!t ~a,<e C:ty · Wycr": qg. Cheyep-e QUALITY ENGINEERING SINCE 1965 Dupey Management Corporation Terracon Job No. 17931033 December 29, 1993 Results of the field density tests along with three standard Proctor tests are attached. Tests 1 to 40 were perlbrmed in the drainage ditch and tests 41 to 137 were performed in the building area. Test 41 to 137 were referenced to the southeast building corner which was given an assumed station of 0 north and 0 west. If you have any questions regarding this report or in need of any further services, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, C'E~ic ~'ela~,, P-(E. Clement B. Bommarito, P.E. Project Engineer Office Manager EJC:CBB:kms Attachments Copy To: James, Harwick + Partners, Inc. Mr. Mark Wolf Albert Halff & Associates, Inc. Mr. Dennis Chovan Bob Moore Construction, Inc. Mr. Phil Bell City of Coppell Mr. Larry Davis 2 FIELD COMPACTION REPORT Job No. _17931033 _ Job Name and Location M.J. DESIGNS DISTRIBUTION ~ Date 12-15-93 Architect or Engineer JAMES, HARI~CK + P~, INC. Contractor BOB___MQORE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Method of Density Measurement Datum SITE DATtl~I I 'Lift No. Haximum In-PLace I In-PLace Test Date Location or Htr. Lab Dry Wet Water Dry Percent Comments No. Etev. Hark Density Density Content Density Comp. 1 12-6 50 FT NORTH OF LIFT 1 A 94.5 112.7 29.8 86.8 92 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 2 12-6 100 FT NORTH LIFT 1 A 94.5 113.3 28.0 88.5 94 DRAINAGE SOUTH END : DITCH 3 12-6 150 FT NORTH OF LIFT 1 A 94.5 113.8 29.6 87.8 93 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 4 12-6 200 FT NORTH OF LIFT 1 A 94.5 114.6 28.9 88.9 94 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 5 12-6 250 FT NORTH OF LIFT 1 A 94.5 113.4 29.2 87.8 93 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 6 12-7 50 FT NORTH OF LIFT 2 A 94.5 114.4 28.0 89.4 95 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 7 12-7 100 FT NORTH OF LIFT 2 A 94.5 113.6 28.1 88.7 94 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 8 12-7 150 FT NORTH OF LIFT 2 A 94.5 113.6 28.0 88.8 94 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 9 12-7 200 FT NORTH OF LIFT 2 A 94.5 112.9 28.0 88.2 93 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 10 12-7 250 FT NORTH OF LIFT 2 A 94.5 113.2 28.5 88.1 93 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 11 12-7 50 FT NORTH OF LIFT 3 A 94.5 115.0 29.6 88.7 94 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 12 12-7 100 FT NORTH OF LIFT 3 A 94.5 113.7 28.8 88.3 93 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 13 12-7 150 FT NORTH OF LIFT 3 A 94.5 113.8 28.0 88.9 94 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 14 12-7 200 FT NORTH OF LIFT 3 A 94.5 114.5 29.3 88.6 94 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 15 12-7 250 FT NORTH OF LIFT 3 A 94.5 114.2 28.5 88.9 94 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 16 12-7 50 FT NORTH OF DRAINAGE SOUTH END LIFT 4 A 94.5 114.6 28.9 88.9 94 DITCH 17 12-7 100 FT NORTH OF LIFT 4 A 94.5 113.3 28.8 88.0 93 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 18 12-7 150 FT NORTH OF LIFT 4 A 94.5 113.8 29.6 87.8 93 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 19 12-7 200 FT NORTH OF LIFT 4 A 94.5 114.1 29.0 88.4 94 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 20 12-7 250 FT NORTH OF LIFT 4 A 94.5 114.2 28.6 88.8 94 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 21 12-7 50 FT NORTH OF LIFT 5 A 94.5 113.7 29.3 87.9 93 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 22 12.7 100 FT NORTH OF LIFT 5 A 94.5 112.4 29.0 87.1 92 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 23 12-7 150 FT NORTH OF LIFT 5 A 94,5 114.8 28.0 89.7 95 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 24 12-7 200 FT NORTH OF LIFT 5 A 94.5 113.9 28.8 88.4 94 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 25 12-7 250 FT NORTH OF LIFT 5 A 94.5 113.5 29.6 87.6 93 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 26 12-8 50 FT NORTH OF LIFT 6 A 94.5 113.8 29.2 88.1 93 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 27 12-8 100 FT NORTH OF LIFT 6 A 94.5 113.2 28.6 88.0 93 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH NOTES: Densities shown: pounds per cubic foot Water Content: Percent of dry weight I rerracon Percent Compaction: Based on maximum dry density obtained on sample indicated by material mark. FIELD COMPACTION REPORT Job No. 17931033 Job Name and Location M.J. DE. SIGNS DISTR~BU~IC~ ~ Date 12-15-93 Architect or Engineer J/LMF~t H/LRg~CK + PA.RTNIgRS, ~'qC. Contractor ...... 13OB lvlOORE O01qSTRUC~IOlq, la'qt. Method of Density Measurement Dalum SIT~: DATUlVl Lift No. Haximum In-Ptace In-Place Test Date Location or Mt[. Lab Dry Net Nater Dry Percent Comments No. Etev. Hark Density Density Content Density Comp. 28 12-8 150 FT NORTH OF DRAINAGE SOUTH END LIFT 6 A 94.5 114.8 28.2 89.5 95 DITCH 29 12-8 200 FT NORTH OF DRAINAGE SOUTH END LIFT 6 A 94.5 113.6 28.6 88.3 93 DITCH 30 12-8 250 FT NORTH OF LIFT 6 A 94.5 114.4 30.1 87.9 93 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 31 12-8 EAST BLD. LINE LIFT 7 A 94.5 113.7 28.6 88.4 94 DRAINAGE 20 FT WEST DITCH 32 12-8 EAST BLD. LINE LIFT 7 A 94.5 115.6 29.6 89.2 94 DRAINAGE 40 FT NEST DITCH 33 ~ 12-8 EAST BLD. LINE DRAINAGE 80 FT NEST LIFT 7 A 94.5 113.5 29.6 87.6 93 DITCH 34 12-8 EAST BLD. LINE LIFT 7 A 94.5 114.3 30.2 87.8 93 DRAINAGE 20 FT WEST DITCH 35 12-8 EAST BLD. LINE LIFT 7 A 94.5 114.8 29.6 88.6 94 DRAINAGE 40 FT NEST DITCH 36 12-8 50 FT NORTH OF DRAINAGE SOUTH END LIFT 8 A 94.5 114.7 28.8 89.1 94 DITCH 37 12-8 100 FT NORTH OF LIFT 8 A 94.5 114.4 29.5 88.3 93 DRAINAGE SOUTH END DITCH 38 12-8 150 FT NORTH OF DRAINAGE SOUTH END LIFT 8 A 94.5 [13.8 29.2 88.1 93 DITCH 39 12-8 200 FT NORTH OF DRAINAGE SOUTH END LIFT 8 A 94.5 114.6 30.3 88.0 93 DITCH 40 12-8 250 FT NORTH OF DRAINAGE SOUTH END LIFT 8 A 94.5 113.9 29.8 87.8 93 DITCH 41 12-9 25 N, 25 g LIFT 1 A 94.5 113.9 29.4 88.0 93 42 12-9 125 N, 60 N LIFT 1 A 94.5 114.2 30.2 87.7 93 43 12-9 300 N, 100 ~ LIFT 1 A 94.5 113.5 29.1 87.9 93 .... 44 12-9 400 N, 70 N I LIFT 1 A 94.5 113.5 29.5 87.6 93 45 12-9 620 N, 25 N ~ LIFT 1 A 94.5 113.3 29.6 87.4 93 46 12-9 30 N, 100 N ! LIFT 2 A 94.5 114.? 29.2 88.8 94 47 12-9 175 N, 50 N LIFT 2 A 94.5 114.4 29.5 88.3 93 48 12-9 290 N, 10 N LIFT 2 A 94.5 113.9 29.8 87.8 93 49 12-9 450 N, 60 N LIFT 2 A 94.5 114.4 29.4 88.4 94 50 12-9 610 N, 100 N LIFT 2 A 94.5 115.3 29.5 89.0 94 51 12-9 70 N, 50 N LIFT 3 C 98.5 119.3 29.2 92.3 94 52 12-9 170 N, 25 N LIFT 3 C 98.5 120.2 29.6 92.7 94 53 12-9 325 N, 75 N LIFT 3 C 98.5 118.8 29.0 92.1 93 54 12-9 420 N, 30 N LIFT 3 C 98.5 119.5 28.4 93.1 94 NOTES: Densities shown: pounds per cubic foot Nater Content: Percent of dry weight 1 Ferracon Percent Com4~action: Based on maximum dry density obtained on sample indicated by materiat mark. FIELD COMPACTION REPORT Job No. 17931033 Job Name and Location M.J. DESIGNS DISTRIBUTION ~ Date 12-15-93 Architect or Engineer JAMES, HARW'ICK + PARI~IERS, INC. Contractor BOB MOORE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Method of Density Measurement Datum SITE DATUM Lift No. Maximum ln-Ptace In-Ptace Test Date Location or Mt[. Lab Dry Uet gater Dry Percent Comments No. E[ev. Mark Density Density Content Density Comp. 55 12-9 600 N, 60 W i LIFT 3 C 98.5 120.5 28.1 94.1 95 56 12-9 20 N, 50 W LIFT 4 ¢ 98.5 119.6 28.5 93.1 94 57 12-9 120 N, 90 W LIFT 4 C 98.5 118.5 29.0 91.9 93 58 12-9 270 N, 50 W LIFT 4 C 98.5 119.5 28.4 93.1 94 59 12-9 370 N, 60 W LIFT 4 C 98.5 119.8 28.3 93.4 95 60 12-9 500 N, 25 W LIFT 4 C 98.5 119.9 28.1 93.6 95 61 12-10 220 N, 120 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.6 28.3 93.2 95 62 12-10 250 N, 140 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.1 29.5 92.0 93 63 12-10 300 N, 125 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 118.6 28.8 92.1 93 64 12-I0 350 N, 140 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.3 29.3 92.3 94 65 12-10 375 N, 140 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 118.5 29.0 91.9 93 66 12-10 425 N, 125 W LIFT 2 C 98.5 118.8 28.5 92.5 94 67 12-10 475 N, 110 W LIFT 2 C 98.5 119.3 29.2 92.3 94 68 12-10 500 N, 150 ~ LIFT 2 C 98.5 119.3 29.0 92.5 94 69 12-10 550 N, 130 W I LIFT 2 C 98.5 118.? 29.4 91.7 93 ?0 12-10 600 N, 100 W LIFT 21 c 98.5 119.2 28.8 92.5 94 71 12-10 250 N, 170 ~ LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.5 28.2 93.2 95 72 i 12-10 350 N, 200 g LIFT 1 C 98.5 118.9 28.2 92.7 94 73 12-10 425 N, 170 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 120.1 29.6 92.7 94 74 12-10 550 N, 160 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.3 29.0 92.5 94 75 12-10 620 N, 190 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.8 28.? 93.1 94 76 12-10 220 N, 180 W LIFT 2 C 98.5 118.? 29.5 91.7 93 7? 12-10 350 N, 175 g LIFT 2 C 98.5 119.5 28.9 92.7 94 78 12-10 440 N, 170 W LIFT 2 C 98.5 119.0 29.3 92.0 93 79 12-10 510 N, 180 9 LIFT 2 C 98.5 119.6 29.6 92.3 94 80 12-10 630 N, 170 W LIFT 2 C 98.5 119.4 29.2 92.4 94 81 12-10 280 N, 150 W LIFT 3 C 98.5 118.8 28.5 92.5 94 NOTES: Densities shown: pounds per cubic foot Water Content: Percent of dry weight 1Ferracan Percent Compaction: Based on maximum dry density obtained on sample indicated by material mark. FIELD COMPACTION REPORT Job No. 17931033 Job Name and Location M.J. DE. SIGNS DISTRIBUTION CI~XlTER Date 12-15-93 Architect or Engineer JAI~S, ~CK + PARTRERS, ]~lC. Contractor BOB MOORE OONSTRUCTION, INC. Method of Density Measure~nent Datum SITE DATUIVl Lift No. Haximum ln-Ptace In-Ptace ] Test Date Location or Htr. Lab Dry Wet Water Dry I Percent Conments No. Etev. Mark Density Density Content Density Comp. 82 12-10 400 N, 100 W ] LIFT 3 C 98.5 119.3 29.0 92.5 94 83 12-10 430 N, 140 W LIFT 3 C 98.5 119.5 28.2 93.2 95 84 12-10 525 N, 120 W LIFT 3 C 98.5 118.6 28.8 92.1 93 85 12-10 600 N, 150 W LIFT 3 C 98.5 119.2 28.8 92.5 94 86 , 12-11 250 N, 190 W LIFT 3 C 98.5 119.3 29.0 92.5 94 87 12-11 350 N, 175 W LIFT 3 C 98.5 119.1 29.5 92.0 93 88 12-11 420 #, 175 W LIFT 3 C 98.5 118.7 29.5 91.7 93 89 12-11 500 N, 180 W LIFT 3 C 98.5 120.5 28.9 93.5 95 90 12-11 500 N, 200 W LIFT 3 C 98.5 118.9 28.2 92.7 94 91 12-11 230 N, 120 W LIFT 4 C 98.5 120.1 29.6 92.7 94 92 12-11 310 N, 140 W LIFT 4 C 98.5 118.8 28.5 92.5 94 93 12-11 400 N, 125 W LIFT 4 C 98.5 119.8 28.? 93.1 94 94 12-11 510 N, 125 W LIFT 4 C 98.5 118.5 29.0 91.9 93 95 12-11 610 N, 150 W LIFT 4 C 98.5 119.4 29.2 92.4 94 96 12-11 250 N, 160 W LIFT 4 C 98.5 118.2 28.3 92.1 94 97 12-11 380 N, 190 W J LIFT 4 C 98.5 118.1 28.0 92.3 94 98 12-11 510 N, 180 W LIFT 4 C 98.5 120.3 28.5 93.6 95 99 12-11 590 N, 160 W LIFT 4 C 98.5 119.4 29.3 92.3 94 100 12-11 620 N, 200 W i LIFT 4 C 98.5 118.8 29.0 92.1 93 101 12-11 380 N, 210 W I LIFT 1 C 98.5 118.9 28.2 92.? 94 102 12-11 430 N, 240 W I LIFT 1 C 98.5 118.5 29.0 91.9 93 103 12-11 500 N, 230 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.3 29.0 92.5 94 104 12-11 580 N, 220 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 120.1 29.6 92.7 94 105 12-11 630 N, 235 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.6 28.3 93.2 95 106 12-12 350 N, 220 W LIFT 2 C 98.5 118.8 28.6 92.4 94 107 12-12 410 N, 240 W LIFT 2 C 98.5 118.5 29.2 91.? 93 108 12-12 480 N, 210 W LIFT 2 C 98.5 119.6 28.4 93.1 95 NOTES: Densities shown: pounds per cubic foot Water Content: Percent of dry ,eight I brracan Percent Compaction: Based on maximum dry density obtained on sample indicated by material mark. FIELD COMPACTION REPORT Job No. 17931033 Job Name and Location M.J. DESIGNS DISTRXBt~IOH ~ Date 12-15-93 Architect or Engineer J/LIvIE. S, ~CK + P~, ]~IC. Contractor BOB_..~RE CONSTRUCTION, XNC. Method of Density Measurement Datum SITE DATUM I Lift No. Maximum In-Ptace ln-Ptace Test Date Location or Ht[. Lab Dry Wet Water Dry Percent Comments No. Etev. Mark Density Density Content Density Comp. 109 12-12 550 N 240 W LIFT 2 C 98.5 118.5 29.4 91.6 93 110 12-12 600 N, 210 W LIFT 2 C 98.5 118.5 29.0 91.9 93 111 12-14 320 N, 250 W LIFT 3 C 98.5 119.8 29.6 92.4 94 112 12-14 380 N, 225 W LIFT 3 C I 98.5 119.3 29.2 92.3 94 113 12-14 460 N, 210 W ' LIFT 3 C 98.5 118.7 29.3 91.8 93 114 12-14 540 N, 225 W LIFT 3 C 98.5 119.4 29.8 92.0 93 115 12-14 620 N, 240 W LIFT 3 C 98.5 119.2 29.6 92.0 93 116 12-14 320 N, 260 N LIFT 1 C 98.5 120.5 29.3 93.2 95 117 12-14 380 N, 270 W LIFT I C 98.5 118.7 29.6 91.6 93 118 12-14 450 N, 280 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 118.5 30.0 91.2 93 119 12-14 520 N, 275 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.6 29.3 92.5 94 120 12-14 610 N, 275 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.? 29.6 92.4 94 121 12-14 350 N, 300 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 118.5 29.3 91.6 93 122 12-14 400 N, 325 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 120.8 29.7 93.1 95 123 12-14 575 N, 350 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 120.3 30.3 92.3 94 124 12-14 550 N, 325 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.6 29.4 92.4 94 125 12-14 620 N, 310 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.5 29.8 92.1 93 126 12-15 480 N, 360 N LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.6 29.3 92.5 94 127 12-15 540 N, 390 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.9 29.5 92.6 94 128 12-15 610 N, 400 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 118.? 29.4 91.? 93 129 12-15 475 N, 410 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 120.2 30.3 92.2 94 130 12-15 550 N, 425 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.3 29.2 92.3 94 131 12-15 610 N, 440 9 LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.6 28.8 92.8 94 132 12'15 460 N, 450 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.6 29.9 92.1 93 133 12-15 530 N, 480 W I LIFT 1 C 98.5 120.4 29.8 92.8 94 134 12-15 600 N, 490 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 118.8 30.2 91.2 93 135 12-15 500 N, 510 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.3 28.6 92.8 94 NOTES: Densities shown: pounds per cubic foot Water Content: Percent of dry weight IE~rracan Percent Co~action: Based on maximum dry density obtained on sampte indicated by materiat mark. FIELD COMPACTION REPORT Job No. 17931033 Job Name and Location M.J. DESIGNS DISTRIBUTION ~ Date 12-15-93 Architect or Engineer JAMES, HA.rSqlCK + PARTNERS, INC. Contractor BOB ~OORE CONSTRUCTION, ~qC. Method of Density Measurement ........ Datum SITE DATL~I Lift No. Maximum In-Piece ln-Ptace Test Date Location or Mt[. Lab Dry Wet Water Dry Percent Correnents No. E[ev. Hark Density Density Content Density Comp. 136 12-15 550 N, 525 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.0 29.2 92.1 94 137 12-15 630 N, 590 W LIFT 1 C 98.5 119.7 29.5 92.4 94 NOTES: Densities shown: pounds per cubic foot ~E~rracan Water Content: Percent of dry weight Percent Compaction: Based on maximum dry density obtained on sample indicated by material mark. · 'll'erracan ~35 ~, MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP Job No. 17931033 Date 1219193 ~30 \ ~ Project M.I DESIGNS DISTRIBUTION CENTER - COPPELL. TEXAS Source of Material ON-SITE l~.S '~- Description of Material DARK BRO~VN CLAY \ ~20 ~ Material Designation A Test Method ASTM D-698 {31ETItOD A) 115 \ TEST RF.~ULTS .4-- oo ~ Maximum Dry Density 94.5 PCF .0_ 110 ~ Optimum Water Content 25.0 % "' ATTERBERG LIMITS a. ~0.~ LL PL PI -a 75% 25% 50% o v CURVES OF 100% SATURATION 100 FOR SPECIFIC GRAVITY EQUAL TO: H 80 >- 95 85 80 75 0 5 l0 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 WATER CONTENT (Percent Drg Weight) · ll'err can ,~s \ ~ MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP Job No. 17931033 Date 1219193 130 \ ~ Project MJ DESIGNS DISTRIBUTION ~V CENTER - COPPELL. TEXAS Source of Material ON-SITE 125 Description of Material BROWN CI.AY, WITH GRAVEL Material Designation B 120 Test Method ASTM D-698 ~-IETIIOD A) 115 ~ \ TEST RESULTS oo ~ Maximum Dry Density 103.5 PCF o I l0 I Optimum Water Content 18.0 % o ATrERBERG LIMITS m 105 LL PL '~ 64% 24% 40% o '~' CURVES OF 100% SATURATION 100 FOR SPECIFIC: GRAVITY EQUAL TO: ~ 2.80 tn ~ 2.70 ~- 95 tn ~ 2.60 90 85 80 75 0 5 l0 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 14RTER CONTENT (Percent Dry I, leigh'l') _ ~, · 'lrerracan ~ ' MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP Job No. 17931033 Date 1219193 ]3o ~. ~ Project MJ DESIGNS DISTRIBUTION ,~~~ CENTER - COPPELL, TEXAS Source of Material ON-SITE 125 Description of Material BROSVN & DARK BROWN CLAY 120 Material Designation C Test Method ASTM D-698 (~'IETItOD A) 115 \ TEST RF_~ULTS oo ~ Maximum Dry Density 98.5 PCF o I1O ~ Optimum Water Content 22.0 % o ATTERBERG LIMITS o_ ]05 LL PL PI -o 68% 26% 42% o "=' CURVES OF 100% SATURATION 100 FOR SPECIFIC GRAVITY EQUAL TO: >- 95 9o 85 8o 75 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 WATER CONTENT (Percent Dr9 Wei~lhf)