The URL can be used to link to this page

Riverview Estates-SY 970929Austin Catbird, L.P. 8222 Douglas Avenue, Suite 660 Dallas, Texas 75225 Phone: (214) 750 -1800 Fax: (214) 750 -5900 E -mail: hu_ffinesZ=2,k net September 29, 1997 Mr. Allen Johnson Federal Insurance Administrator Risk Studies Division 500 C Street, Southwest Washington, DC 20472 Re: LOMB -F submittal. Dear Mr. Johnson: Enclosed is one (1) fully executed copy of a LOMR -F submittal and a copy of an $800 check, which has been forwarded directly to the Fee - Collection System Administrator. Please fax your acknowledgment that you have everything needed to process this application to my attention at (214) 750 -5900 and forward an original to that effect via Federal Express overnight delivery (envelope and delivery label enclosed for your convenience). Thank you for your assistance in handling this matter. Sincerely, Donald B. Huffines President of Bellaire Oaks, Inc. General Partner of Austin Catbird, L.P. I 1061 DATE 9/15/1997 PAY To National Flood Insurance Program AMOUNT $ 800,00 FOR Case #: 96- 06 -382C CATEG. Insurance ACCT. Austin Catbird k BANK ONE 10 61 Austin Catbird, L.P. Bank One, Texas, NA 14024 8222 Douglas Avenue, Suite 660 8111 Preston Road, Dallas, Texas 75225 Dallas, TX 76226 ' 32- 61/1110 i - Phone: (214) 760-1 800 - M ood 1nsur -boi Prbgrazu X * *800.00 on ' Eight Hund -nd 0011611, k* ri********** �** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *,� * * * * * * * * * * ** err i i , Case #: 96- 06- 382C.__ "".. � 1 110006 &[X LOG In" &B9 194998 211' t.� "X 912A 01-7 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY fEMA USE ONLY Ex pF S res u�31� 997 PROPERTY INFORMATION PUBLIC BURDEN DISCLOSURE NOTICE w Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average .63 hour per response. The burden estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing and reviewing the form. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Information Collections Management, Federal Emergency Management A ene 500 C Street S.W. Washin ton DC 20472. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless a valid OMB Control Number Is displayed in the upper right corner of this fo This form may be completed by the property owner, registered land surveyor, or registered professional engineer 1. Community Name: C..PPIE.. County: Dal a •c State: U XAS Community Number: 480170 Panel or Map Number: 0007,QE Effective Date: 2. Street Address of Property :1 3. Description of Property Lot and Block (ifa streetadd: ' f 4. Are you requesting that the 51 01 1 A designation be removed from (a) all of the land within the bounds of the property, (b) a portion of land within the bounds of the property (metes and bounds description is required) or (c) the structure(s) on the property? ( Answer "a ", "b" or "c" ) W A 5. Is this request for (a 1 a single residential structure or lot, (b) a single commercial structure or lot, (c) multiple L structures or lots? ( Answer "a ", "b" or "c ") • C � If existing structure, what was the date of construction ? 6. Is this request prior to the transfer of ownership of the property in question from a developer to an individual property owner? 1:1 Yea ® No 7. Is this request for (u) existing conditions or (b) proposed project? ( Answer "a" or "b ") 'A' _ a AS—BUILT a 8. Has fill been placed in an identified SFI I A or to elevate a structure(s) ? Xrg_ If yes, when? � n n�4_ 9. For proposed projects, will fill be placed to elevate this land or structure ? r i i PL,ACFn AFTER CLUMR THIS IS AN AS LONR 10. Do you know of previous requests that have been submitted to FEMA for this property or adjacent properties? If yes, what was the date of PEMA's response letter? OCTOBER + �.fiTTro ATTACHED PLEASE REF!• 11 TOTHE INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE A PPROPRIATE MAILING ADDItE S MT•1 Form 1 Page 1 of 2 F EM A Form 81.87, MAY 96 Property Information form ~ 04/24/97 15:20 CITY OF COPPELL ENGINEERING 4 917 335 5070 Federal Emergency Man Washington, D.C. 20472 The Honorable Tom Morton Mayor, City of Coppell P.O. Box 478 Copped, Texas 75019 -0478 Dear Mayor Morton: OCT 17 1996 IN REPLY REFER TO: Case No.: 96- 06-3820 C City of Coppeil, Taus Community No.: 480170 Map Panel Affected: 00 E . 219.65 -CR M' NO.036 902 Qf.A^ - 703 Sri b2" This respond& to a letter dated June 18, 1996, from Mr. Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E., Assistant City Manager, City Engineer, City of Coppell, rcTxstb* that the Federal Emergency Management ABBY (FEMA) determine whether the property described below viould be located m a Special Flood Hazard Area (SPHA). an area that would be inundated by the flood having a 1- percent chance of being equaled or c=eeded in any given year (base flood). This property will be elevated by the placement of fill ails' tint date of the earliest ... National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map :hawing the area in the SFHA. prn ;ern Dcsjmtion Proposed Riverview Estates C,�.� �^ a..— � C,gminunity a_nd tare S : City of COpped, Texas , V-J ter ,L' On October 8, 1996, we received all information necessary to process this request After �WM this information to the NFIP map for the City of Copped, Texas, we determined that de propccty would nOt be in the SFHA if fill is placed as proposed- This conditional determination is based on the site plan, entitled "Thompson Fill, Elm Fork Trinity River, Floodplain and Floodway Delineation of Existing and Proposed Fill Site," prepared by Morrison Hydrology/Engineering, dated May 1996, and on elevation information provided by Mr. Ronald W. Morrison, P.E., in a IcUcr dated July 26, 1996- Our final determination will be made upon receipt Of a copy of this letter, a copy of the final plat with recordation data, and certified as -built information showing the • elevation of the lov#est ground on the property. In addition, the enclosed form, entitled "Certification of Fill Placement," must be returned, signed and dated by a registered professional engineer, an accredited soils engineer, or the community's NFIP permit official. To minimize the futamial burden on the policyholders while maintaining the NFIP as self- sustaining, FEMA implemented a procedure to remover costs associated with reviewing and processing requests for modifications to published flood information and maps. Effective October 1, 1996, FEMA revised the fee schedule. _ enablishing a flat review and processing fee for each type of request. The fee for your request is $800, and must be submitted before we can begin processing your request. Payment of this fee shall be made in the form of a check or money order in U.S. hinds, made payable to the , or _ by credit card. For Wendfication purposes, the case mhmber referees above mot be included on the check or money order. Payment shall be sent to the following address: Federal Emergency Maoagemem Agency Fee-tollecdon System Adminism P.O. Box 3173 MERRUgELD VA 22116 -3173 15 :20 CITY OF COPPELL ENGINEERING -► 817 335 5070 NO. 836 P03 pease now coat this p ..td be immdawd py a fkood greater than the base flood or by local flooding conditions not shown on the NM map. Flood insurance is available at a reduced coat for properties located outside the SFHA. Also, although we have based our deternma tim ou the flood dam presently available, flood conditions may change or new information may be generated that could superseft this determination. This response is based on the minimum criteria estddisbed by the NM. State and community officials, based on knowledge of local conditions and in the rest of public saffty, may set higher standards for covatruction in the floodplain. If the State, County, or community has adopt more restrk&C and comprehensive floodplain management Criteria those criteria tame precedence over the minimum Federal criteria. This ktUr does not relieve Federal 40M of the teed m comply with Eaecatwc Order 11988 on FloodpWn Management in carrying out their resPOUA tm Wd providing federally undertaken, financed, or assisted construction and improvements, or in their regulating or licensing activities• if you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please contact Ms. Agnes De Coca of our staff in Washington, DC, either by telephone at (202) 646 or by facsimile at (202) 646 Sincerely, C��Ge- j ��i� Michael K. Bucidey, P.E., Chief Hazard Idea WMAtim Branch Mftaiion Direcmraw . Enclosure cc: Mr. Kenneth M. Griffin, P. E. Assistant City Manager/City Engineer City of Coppell 04/24/97 ^ 11. I have enclosed the following documents in support of this request: a. Copy of the flat Map (with recordation data) with recorder's seal OR b. Copy of the Deed (with recordation data), accompanied by a tax assessor's map, plat map or other suitable map showing the surveyed location of the property with recorder's seal (For these maps a map scale must be prouided and they should not be reduced or enlarged) ^ _ X_ c. Copy of the effective FIRM panel on which the property location has been accurately plotted (if the request is for more than one lallstructure, this location must be certified by a licensed land surveyor or ^ registered professional engineer) d. A map showing the location of any structures existing on or proposed for the property (certifted by a licensed land surueyor or registered professional engineer) e. Metes and bounds description and accompanying map (only if the request is for a portion of land within the bounds of the property, not structure(s) only) _ f. Elevation Information form W g. Community Acknowledgement form (only 1f fill has been/ ie�,11 be p laced) h. Certification of Fill Compaction form (only if fill has been will be placed and the request is not for a single residential structure) i. Initial fee (see page 7 o instructions for initial fees and exemptions) ann -no Type Or rc4ussty aIr►ountsnelarsd PAYMENT ENCLOSED Check or money order only. Make check or money order payable to: National Flood Insurance Program. If paying by Visa or Mastercard please refer to the credit card -' information form which follows this form. j. Additional information: (please specify) 12. All documents submitted in support of this request are correct to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1001. Applicant's Name: Mailing Address: ES FFINES AND PARTNERS 8222 DOUGLAS AVE. IbbU (please print or type) Daytime Telephone Number: ,2j4- 7!50—j$Qt1 qt g7 e Ptanprty Inlnrma /inn Fnrm RATA Fnrm 1 Pans) n1 100 50 100 _ - UGC " asp vo D e Cr " 1tD r r I I — -- - ` - - - -- t -- - -- - - -- = - - -- pI IN EAGK I ! I i I 617E DISTANCE DETA►L r t • aSi s 45 ✓ S 5'- - E5M T 25 I -GZONT B.t.. \ I 5 S DE �' AR% _ I - --•_ AT STREET - - - - - -- 6C, �5 A��CY 5 V S BIL Tt r' E5M T 15 '5 NISI ®►CITY EA6EMENT aETAI� r t t R '06 aE R = -55 C D_ 1 -t3.2 - 2- D s C °2 -4t t 5 i R PROJt61T BITt i Q p( i 1 RIVERCHASE DRIVE c 2 J i 303 - 4 VICINITY MAi� -- -- R 0^ OCDII IOM �� ti - �L - - -- ♦ -` 5 = -- - t - -s (2O O7 1 153' I - ,, , ------ - - - - -- 67043' 1 -- -- - I � O 54 "F a'' � � 500 °04 r4 "W — — — -�- —• — -- —'� — - �-- 25 00' �, a9 .� 25 0c, R 40.00' in D = 8q °0355 N44 3� 6 ,,W �W W /Q s 545 °08'!O "W T = 3 ' 35 S!' ZONED "R" f L =6218' '- ! CH 5EE MEDIAN I R E T A L GB = 545 °15'03 "E �c E - A m W m DETAIL BELOW �I 3 3806 AO �5aa AC '> , 589 °47'OG "E 441123 ' o e ps !� I ro r 58�i °47'00 "E 743 88' p 5 ALt_EY I Aorlm -- - n '5' ALLEN' n e�.o 3363 _ r ,a r - -, -- - - 7vaz -� T Oa - -err- - , 5_zv_ Do �sao' Fa zafi - �— - 3 ur • 1 56 015' -+S UE �'I f�B'� �i, v £ 3 vE -pi 6..299 - 3 JE 1" w 406E � �I �' pI+ 4� W� eur-1- pT Q�� 6.� t 05 n l ; p :3 ° - �� S < C o r 2S vl` x R R J'�S' o.E _ n n s _ I �i I r: L 4. ; � b ��.a-t s4lbg n r r n r < 1 _ x � D T_ D C• r f f �IZ v r a� 4 5TREE7 G L. CUR DATA - -- UTILITY CERTIFICATE CURVE RADIUS DELTA TANGENT ��Eh6Tf� 5ANDY E3EARING LAKE RD. - 54 OS 1 5 32 °44 Ia 66 0 28 56 Q�55'3 26 52 N 73''50 1! - NII'2'4? 1 5541 VV K' REL CA`EC' 5EF'TEMBER 13 ' -153 RECORDED IN VOLUME 53134 PA&E r' 23 OF —E CES RECORDS OF DAL4-A5 COUNTY TEXAS (CR.DC T 1 ANC ord ao5em6nt5 5hOr+r therecr The ad5er".ents 9ho"r hereor ore BEING M - 7 E LULARL" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOY r TxA3 I ML AJ5 T 1 1N CATBIRD, LP No bv,'ding5 forces trees shrut5ps or other 1mproJemerts or GC*aMEr1G' A - A NG ' RON ROD FOUND FOR A SORNER IN THE SOUTH PARAGON CABLE I LIP R �+aT F - YIA� -,NE 5ANCY -AKE ROAD (A VARIABLE WIDTH ROM) 54IL Ut ty Easerner is ' os shorxr 50 a Jt 'ty Eas en'enC S be,nq PO NT EE " +G ' N_ CORNER OF SAIL 25 045 ACRE TRAG' Hereby rose for the r^ tvo _so ord aGc:� of a ANC A -SC 5E '-*5 - #-'E "+ORTHYVEST CORNER OF A CALLED'3 ACRE TRAC' pub IC, ut e desirino to use o �9 r u sar^G A Ar�Q Qn G' R {3E: �, ' _� i t EARL K FARROM E'Y DEEP REGORDEC IN N OLUP''E p_c lG . t . to ShQI ha ✓e the - a tC 'e-c ✓e Ora keep 'en"C /ea i I I i mpro,er -arts or gror,t hs wh �^ n•o, Ir any ^o? ardarger ,r -- v R i fe - ' c:E '< 3Y DE °AfK' NCB SHE ?�T + R S+~T- OF -AAY SINE OF r� A T ti -A T a , °5C =A . _ A'1L -, ' -AKE RCAD ANC YII THE GOt -MON LI NE C SAID 250. 58 ^espectl /e sus ~e^ - or the vt t. Easements and a pub 'G ACRc: TRACT ANP � 3 6 A 7,RE TRACT A D15TANCE OF 211,4 FEE" TO A vtlllt e5 sna' :t a" timee hove :re + v ' ant Of roress and AKC Ar A` THE °DINT OF BE61NN''vG egress tc o' From ord vpo- the so a vt, t EQ9ernerts fcr the C'vrcc5e cf Co ns truct ra rP, Grstr ct no rscec.t ra pctr. 'Ira ' 5C'R E w T 'HE GOM*+ON �'NE OF' SAID 25 0488 ACRE - R--�_ Ta'rta'n rc' and 0oo to ,, ramp✓ rg F'�r a cr Gdrt5 of t_� ' A`w 3 t AL RE TRAC � A C STAN,C E OP 36C r^ r TC A ', � NU•+ re5peGt 5y5ter- ry t ;.rr3 ^ec_e55,ty of on, time Cr r,,rocur rG� RAN R` r �A �'ui TOR vC�C1vER the peer -551or --f G ^yore t THENCE ` C2 - 4 2C rN ✓N' THE Li NE OF 5A,C 250483 ACRE cs Texas v. s *_re d0u c+ AN:: 'RAGT AN "' 3'6 A RC " E TRAC P A55'N5 A `.CH IRON ROD F OD UN AT 25* 08 lu crc- Ate_ DISTANCE CF 254 30 FEE` TO A , 2 INCH IRON RCC FOJNI✓ N '1 1, iCRT 4 _'NE: /f EAGLE AO1NT Y "-ASE A R /ERC«+A =F� c T T Tv v1 - c T r T A _A Ate✓ ON O `H✓ �c EL `Ex.AS Xv 7 r- �Av' t T ✓ c�� ' 4 • uE 1= ',•. A T y � - T ' Pona'a 8 HLfflnes - `'- F�GE 1F `.k r% _.5 %45e A' RE. A re s (I Be llare OAKS nG "R'AC' AIV^ `;•, E� EAGLE c^ •_ a- R' /fiR A1717'T � A aenerQ' Partner of A)etln Catbird E - - .,c 2 ,.. 6 v FEE _,.: A .. N�_ Ri''. ROL FCR C =RNER 5L Nv `HE :� JT -WC5T C'R`u - R _I_ =>A . . 7 Md G A:oR_r: 'RAC ANZ A - `E .A✓ E rN RQ�' SUR.E`1' ASST NO ''S2 Ak0 RUNG i'J - HE YCST LINE OF THE Cr A - "E EA5T LINE OF= THE D ABST NC' 266 1 • THENCE N C00'4S05" rN NUTr+`rt4E GOk LINE OF °AID 250 -82 ACRE _.rhnty and ;tote o^ tl^'5 day pa'sona'Iu appeared Dcra�d S .*, +ne= MEDIAL DE ♦A'� , Kncl , Nr to ^•e tc be tI a person "nose mare Is svbecribea to tre r � foreoolrg ,ryt -ert And ac<rorvleaged to me that he exeC-U the 5TREE" S.L TANGENT DAT i Same f^ ' the purpose ord Gonslderatlo- UIereln expressed �'ANG°NT `40 BEARING GENb'F 6' ✓e^ user m Hard and sealed of office th 'S the BEET if 4 � t� t Ai r f f �IZ v r a� 4 5TREE7 G L. CUR DATA - -- UTILITY CERTIFICATE CURVE RADIUS DELTA TANGENT ��Eh6Tf� GCRJ �- E3EARING . - 2v0 00 5` "5?" 2 54 2'' 54 OS 1 5 32 °44 Ia 66 0 28 56 Q�55'3 26 52 N 73''50 1! - NII'2'4? r 5 000 21 :8 5541 VV N8q °47 00 "W 1362 70' `' (s T O f J N0 _1E5 - - - MN' JIAA"f R 3� FLOOR _ E v A TION 15 44'00 `a 0 A TO WA NTA N N MEDIANS A` EN`RANCE SANG" -AICE ROAD 1 E� TY EA5E14ENT P E - PE17 AN EASEMENT T U E - TU E-EGTRIG EASEMENT D E - DRA NAGE EASEMENT M'N F; - "1N'MUM F N15H FLOOR ELEVATION R 5 - IRON ROD 5ET WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP R F - IRON ROD FOUND B L - BUILDIN& LINE F 5 L - FENCE SETBACK LINE - IO'x 10' TU ELECTRIC, TRANSFORMER +'AD EASEMENT STREET NAME CHANGE r a 4 �a W V% -.l ki -r c r N ZONED "R' m a .i� m NOW THEREFORE KNOrN AL MEN BY THESE 'RESENTS UTILITY CERTIFICATE I Ty pat COr'°ctiy Aepre°•mf* th• r1Ctulred ytl !ty O-CII mt1 1`01 thl! d/ve CO_NT-' `[xA: AND BEING A PART OF T;$ C ALt_ED 250465 ACRE TRACT C- 01WAM' PAT A,."*fOR1ZEfJ N6%KAnRE desigroting the marsh ab,: ✓e described property a3 R '✓ERV'Err ..i .✓ -•- � •- -•- `� .tea 'C _0HNtiY j E 7'HOMP5ON, ADRIAN F MOORE AND STEVE 4'0 NE � - AR 6A5 W K' REL CA`EC' 5EF'TEMBER 13 ' -153 RECORDED IN VOLUME 53134 PA&E r' 23 OF —E CES RECORDS OF DAL4-A5 COUNTY TEXAS (CR.DC T 1 ANC ord ao5em6nt5 5hOr+r therecr The ad5er".ents 9ho"r hereor ore BEING M - 7 E LULARL" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOY r TxA3 I ML AJ5 T 1 1N CATBIRD, LP No bv,'ding5 forces trees shrut5ps or other 1mproJemerts or GC*aMEr1G' A - A NG ' RON ROD FOUND FOR A SORNER IN THE SOUTH PARAGON CABLE I LIP R �+aT F - YIA� -,NE 5ANCY -AKE ROAD (A VARIABLE WIDTH ROM) 54IL 1 E� TY EA5E14ENT P E - PE17 AN EASEMENT T U E - TU E-EGTRIG EASEMENT D E - DRA NAGE EASEMENT M'N F; - "1N'MUM F N15H FLOOR ELEVATION R 5 - IRON ROD 5ET WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP R F - IRON ROD FOUND B L - BUILDIN& LINE F 5 L - FENCE SETBACK LINE - IO'x 10' TU ELECTRIC, TRANSFORMER +'AD EASEMENT STREET NAME CHANGE r a 4 �a W V% -.l ki -r c r N ZONED "R' m a .i� m NOW THEREFORE KNOrN AL MEN BY THESE 'RESENTS OUbARt GlRTIFIC ATE BUNG A TRACT OF LAND N T HE W PERRY ABS - RACT NO 1 152 IN DALLAS CO_NT-' `[xA: AND BEING A PART OF T;$ C ALt_ED 250465 ACRE TRACT THAT Austin Catbird a does hereby adopt to s p of DESCR'8EC N A CEEC FROM _EAN HUDNAL.,_ 'MARSH AND JC+AN VESLEI desigroting the marsh ab,: ✓e described property a3 R '✓ERV'Err ..i .✓ -•- � •- -•- `� .tea 'C _0HNtiY j E 7'HOMP5ON, ADRIAN F MOORE AND STEVE ESTATES or) Qadlt on to the Glty of Coppe , Texas aro dces K' REL CA`EC' 5EF'TEMBER 13 ' -153 RECORDED IN VOLUME 53134 PA&E hereby de dicate to the pvb'IG v5e fOre.er the streets awGys 23 OF —E CES RECORDS OF DAL4-A5 COUNTY TEXAS (CR.DC T 1 ANC ord ao5em6nt5 5hOr+r therecr The ad5er".ents 9ho"r hereor ore BEING M - 7 E LULARL" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOY nereby raser. ea for pv'pose5 c ndlGdteo AJ5 T 1 1N CATBIRD, LP No bv,'ding5 forces trees shrut5ps or other 1mproJemerts or GC*aMEr1G' A - A NG ' RON ROD FOUND FOR A SORNER IN THE SOUTH groWtns Sho' ca constl` ted o- p ace,a vpo' cue' c• - across t-a R �+aT F - YIA� -,NE 5ANCY -AKE ROAD (A VARIABLE WIDTH ROM) 54IL Ut ty Easerner is ' os shorxr 50 a Jt 'ty Eas en'enC S be,nq PO NT EE " +G ' N_ CORNER OF SAIL 25 045 ACRE TRAG' Hereby rose for the r^ tvo _so ord aGc:� of a ANC A -SC 5E '-*5 - #-'E "+ORTHYVEST CORNER OF A CALLED'3 ACRE TRAC' pub IC, ut e desirino to use o �9 r u sar^G A Ar�Q Qn G' R {3E: �, ' _� i t EARL K FARROM E'Y DEEP REGORDEC IN N OLUP''E p_c lG . t . to ShQI ha ✓e the - a tC 'e-c ✓e Ora keep 'en"C /ea Q or or�I Cat/ a'n99 fe ^ce5 '_lees 5 Or OtnG' mpro,er -arts or gror,t hs wh �^ n•o, Ir any ^o? ardarger ,r - ' c:E '< 3Y DE °AfK' NCB SHE ?�T + R S+~T- OF -AAY SINE OF Irte'Dere , n'tr the const or m okenonce or of + IC erGy c '1:5 =A . _ A'1L -, ' -AKE RCAD ANC YII THE GOt -MON LI NE C SAID 250. 58 ^espectl /e sus ~e^ - or the vt t. Easements and a pub 'G ACRc: TRACT ANP � 3 6 A 7,RE TRACT A D15TANCE OF 211,4 FEE" TO A vtlllt e5 sna' :t a" timee hove :re + v ' ant Of roress and A` THE °DINT OF BE61NN''vG egress tc o' From ord vpo- the so a vt, t EQ9ernerts fcr the C'vrcc5e cf Co ns truct ra rP, Grstr ct no rscec.t ra pctr. 'Ira ' 5C'R E w T 'HE GOM*+ON �'NE OF' SAID 25 0488 ACRE - R--�_ Ta'rta'n rc' and 0oo to ,, ramp✓ rg F'�r a cr Gdrt5 of t_� ' A`w 3 t AL RE TRAC � A C STAN,C E OP 36C r^ r TC A ', � NU•+ re5peGt 5y5ter- ry t ;.rr3 ^ec_e55,ty of on, time Cr r,,rocur rG� RAN R` r �A �'ui TOR vC�C1vER the peer -551or --f G ^yore THENCE ` C2 - 4 2C rN ✓N' THE Li NE OF 5A,C 250483 ACRE cs Texas v. s *_re d0u c+ AN:: 'RAGT AN "' 3'6 A RC " E TRAC P A55'N5 A `.CH IRON ROD F OD UN AT 25* 08 __ ( `% p," au crc- Ate_ DISTANCE CF 254 30 FEE` TO A , 2 INCH IRON RCC FOJNI✓ N '1 1, iCRT 4 _'NE: /f EAGLE AO1NT Y "-ASE A R /ERC«+A =F� c T T Tv v1 - c T r T A _A Ate✓ ON O `H✓ �c EL `Ex.AS Xv 7 r- �Av' AHGT NO ?_ b ANC - �-r Yl Pl!:RR`r _4,R ABS NC 152 A3 ✓ c�� ' 4 • uE 1= ',•. A T y � - T ' Pona'a 8 HLfflnes - `'- F�GE 1F `.k r% _.5 %45e A' RE. A re s (I Be llare OAKS nG "R'AC' AIV^ `;•, E� EAGLE c^ •_ a- R' /fiR A1717'T � A aenerQ' Partner of A)etln Catbird E - - .,c 2 ,.. 6 v FEE _,.: A .. N�_ Ri''. ROL FCR C =RNER 5L Nv `HE :� JT -WC5T C'R`u - R _I_ =>A . . 7 Md G A:oR_r: 'RAC ANZ A - `E .A✓ E rN RQ�' SUR.E`1' ASST NO ''S2 Ak0 RUNG i'J - HE YCST LINE OF THE Cr A - "E EA5T LINE OF= THE D ABST NC' 266 °_-Fore ^-e the - oarsanao n Notary f'x�lc , r and for sa id • THENCE N C00'4S05" rN NUTr+`rt4E GOk LINE OF °AID 250 -82 ACRE _.rhnty and ;tote o^ tl^'5 day pa'sona'Iu appeared Dcra�d S .*, +ne= �C A>`v^ SAID EAGLE PO NT Vlt,.�A!�E AT R'VERCHASE A DISTANCE OF , Kncl , Nr to ^•e tc be tI a person "nose mare Is svbecribea to tre 61 44 FEE- TC A 1/: ANCµ RCN ROD 5ET FOR ;.ORDER AND BE'N6 THE foreoolrg ,ryt -ert And ac<rorvleaged to me that he exeC-U the 5E5 I, ,', `+�7 OF A. 'NCN- TAN6 GUR /E• TC THE _E'r HA ✓IN& H RAC'J5 '?F Same f^ ' the purpose ord Gonslderatlo- UIereln expressed +JO i r EE T A C NOR BEARING l 5 45''505 E A A LiIO ' i :TANGF 6' ✓e^ user m Hard and sealed of office th 'S the BEET if 4 � t� t Ai —ji, r ", 1 4s , !`,5 A,:,ti6 3A.. Furs- 'A�vE .vN2VE "✓ ��€ _EF^ T..ROI�� A ' KiOtdry PvbNc r and far tre State -f - e-05 �.EN '"rCA�. A'i:^ :IF <i� .�� 5c A,R A^, , ARC. E:. 3 r TY THENCE nq ' 1� OC E A D15`AVC.= CF s3 FEET TC A Nv++ FT TOR GONER SATE _ ^F `ExAS E A :. ^'A ^."E OF �_-4 413 FEE` ''C a '2 .G^* CO'.NTY �F DA..�AS R�. c2JG &E' �.NC✓r AL_ MEN EY THESE PRESENTS TY+at 5epohr Pa'n,Qn : ° rCC T - , .. -+'Sh 4a r� A *Isla`. E ;/r ?5 2e rf'ET -, A : 'rCH Gorse tlno Eng,ncere GC he'Oby GOr that prepared th15 pot f' •� ar aG *_.a ora accv'ote svr ey of the and '"fit the cannon monuments shorn rre'e � T_• N C `O4 rte _ A 2 : E CF .2500 F°EE T TC A 2 'NCH properl p aced under m personQ' evper�IS On 'n accordance rr tr R' - t. ROC _E` FOR CORNER ,N - I»E 5A P the G attmg rv Oro ^age otlon5 of t-6 C, t_ of Coppe1 - 6;, o5 5AtiDY" _A►Z: ROAD -„�' =:- y r�f U': 5 . E `= ALA R.�v 'r^E `_K._ r' R r -VIA { ` r- �c y Sep_- r Parr ,Anv �.A L `_-•�'�;�` _AK.E FZCA^✓ A D'�TA *.GE JF 2C C"' cEET '• ; A ..: RO 'StereA PrOfOS9'Or0 ..ord 5vr.e r RC', �cGG 5E' =,?R :! RNER N TrJE NE a= SA P Nc 3466 Tff;r*�CC G ^�"v -z• 5-+ ✓r ✓FEAR' tie T� �'' T>~ R,�-+T_OF- ,�vA'' � "~E L F _ °<1-: R�A✓ A Z✓ 5 _ 2500 IE:E` T A I 2 NCH IRON SET r :?4 CORNER 5 OF y + G vu � � -T / C �G I C, T C A ' /2 `HE'NC E .� 4 5 ✓v A AkNC E J 5 5 EE' v._ r k.7N ROD SET FJR G<:RNEQ 5.9+ore •ne the r,dern 3reo o Nai<ir Pic , c. r ora to ^3 - ANCE Govnty and State, on this day personally appeared 5epanr Porn a'I ",C h A i OF 1 54 Q' TEE" T^ A 1 , crortr to me to be the par5or rihOSe mane Is subscribed to the " ° ore9oIng instrument and aGscnowledged to e that he execvteo the _ _ sA^'e f 0' t►G DvrbCbC and Or''dC *JC'Or LrGrer e1prG99Ca iF �4° d,r, FEE `+ E r'Ctn.T Cr ✓Gr .rAer my nQ'.. .. . -C.: ed .:+ . > at� {j. 5 1¢ ire � - ? Jv ^i N& A a_ rte- T % "v „ ..: A R o AGR 6 �_ ,_ `� A v: •.'�v Rt:. ,.R Notdry r�b'Ac r and for the State cF `e •o_ f 0 ° I • FI Q,r ve ,e �t me ^t Perm'C App Gat Or Lit, Of Gpp�e FlOodp oir Aa-r ttrptr_,' or t Ll pLA .�AriM' i 5'RATGR - _ '"Ile de.elOper by der seller pr agent era InForm Ir rrritino earn prospect' ✓e vvyer of 9ubdi 5 or Ict° or Frocerty 'oc;jred vlith spec a' flood h areo$ of tn S'te trot 9vGh property 'S Ir Cr dent Fied f'GOd arCO and tl`�dt oil dGvC OpMCrt must to the pr0✓15 o f the C'tv CF r" � edr a'r Mar.; creme ^: Crd� ^an ,e3 --,e IN, tter notice 5 cU Ge o ed ire f,��rt4 need O' ReGG"04 ^." GCiL -I fine "Gt �e mv9C aGGGmpu ^ry ire ap: Gdt `r f � ae e- ocmont oe'm.i THE FOi.LOWIN6 VARIANG0 A.RE R�O E�57TI NC A_LFYS BEH'ND _C"5 a tne-_ 5: A AC 5�*�Y(N 4EREON NC A�_EY BEHIND L0 ' BLC: rc A_� 3HOYW� I�EREG CURRENT ZONING = "5F -9" PLATTED AREA = lq 3282 AC TOTAL L-075 = 66 SUR PC4 CONSULTING ETl&NF_ER5, INC. 1 - 0 EMPIRE CENTRAL PLACE 5Ul 305 OALLA5 TEXAS 7524 ;21 630 -5200 C^ a Of 0 , C, i L4 LN '1"C ,rderP arr_•d LrC G t� �°r�rClrlry �t "nC '. tv rt .''�ppe Teri ^ - pert Fes t ^at V'u° I Co , C i !:Y+ - ate tie t, Gc.nc t e gay F D aac sna .'e C1 'C FO ^z0 - -t O" firer dr,� fir- -o aG..t to C s't'et.' "s a e-,5 co -" oosemerC C ue ac e8 ^d note' and severer Ires o5 excrar d Set felt Ir err sciC L:. nom F. t. er 'a, tJ'O^ ZCv t v 't?JUr tG to * ^e x:..,gc t ar _ a t ^srd_ � ::•, s,9r r : r e Horne as �e - ©'r ar;c ; e .0 ✓r t esR ^ *,arc .^ 4 �� - ao y of .��` A E aa'� � •ro log" wsro"a ossff•poarmt .. �. �. ®.. o ... �... �.. �,...., �1..� C'�'`t,^• Gr �L `SA AL— AS n XA.^_ - 4 C-2 j_E: " � F RV -EL . F RE 04 or ..i .✓ -•- � •- -•- `� .tea /�, AJ5 T 1 1N CATBIRD, LP Y G 9�r � •ro log" wsro"a ossff•poarmt .. �. �. ®.. o ... �... �.. �,...., �1..� C'�'`t,^• Gr �L `SA AL— AS n XA.^_ - 4 C-2 j_E: " � F RV -EL . F x NE X zoNE :; 1 1� . \ FIGURE 2 1 FAIRWAY > DRIVE— 1 / LON _ � a r , 'Z ONE X I Iio OELTIINE -- t = 441 ROAD U FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY PIMA USE ONLY O.M.s. NFL. 3007.0147 ELEVATION INFORMATION Expketluly3l, W7 PUBLIC BURDEN DISCLOSURE NOTICE Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average .63 hour per response. The burden estimate Includes the Lime for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing and reviewing the form.. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Information Collections Management, Federal Emergency Management You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless a valid OMB Control Number is displayed in the upper right corner of this form. This form must be completed by a licensed land surveyor or registered professional engineer. These forms should not be used for requests Involving Channelisation. Bridges/Culverts. or Will in the 11PEMA- Designated Floodway. Forms entitled, "Revisions to National hood insurance Program Maps (MT -2)" should be used. The Elevtion Information Form must be included for all requests, unless the request Is for a determination In wbich- the IFIRM already shows the property to be CLEARLY outside the SPHA. Cases In which the determination for the property or structure Is uncertain will require the submittal of elevation data to provide a definitive determination. If an elevation certificate has been completed for the subject property it maybe submitted in lieu of this form. (5.. por. 7u / instruction. for deloitrl 1. Community Name: CORRELL. TEXA- 2. Legal Description of Property: (SEE PRnnFQTY jNFORMATiON SMf.ET S. Flooding Source: 15 N Fner nt: THE Tp I N t TX 4. Based on the FI RM, this property is located in Lone(s) AE 5. Is any portion of this property located in the regulatory ftoodway? ❑ Yes K] No Are any structures (existing or proposed) located in the regulatory floodway? ❑ Yes R) No 6. Is this area subject to land subsidence or uplift? ❑ Yes R3 No, If yes, what is the date of the current releveling? 7. What is the BPE for this property? (Provide elevation to nearest tenth of a foot and datum)* 445 Elevation 1610 Datum 8. How was the BPE determined ? (attach a copy of the Flood Profile or table from the Fla report, if appropriate`, or other necessary supporting information including Forms 3 and 4 from forms entitled, Revisions to National Flood Insurance Program Maps" (MT -2)). TAKEN FROM FEMA MAP AND CLUMR DONE BY HALFF AND ASsnr-iATFC FOR THE ELM FORK OF THE TRioTTY RiyFR SANnX LAKE ROAD BRZDG6 STUDY 9. If a flood profile for the 500 -year flood was provided in the FIS Report, what is the 500 -year flood elevation for this property? X9_83 - 450-26 Elevation NO Datum W. If this request is to remove the SFI I A designation from a parcel of land or lot(s), what Is the existing or proposed elevation of the lowest grade; that is, the lowest ground on the property? (Provide elevation to nearest tenth of a fiat and datum)* 44 ;.g- hlevaLion M6Vn Datum 1 PLEASH Hb:b'b:R TO THE INSTRUCTIONS M0H THE APPROPRIATE MAILING ADDRESS fMA f arm 61 87A, MAY 96 F levaIion Information Form 1 l . if this request is to remove the SF'I I A designation from a structure(s), what is the elevation of the existing or proposed lowest adjacent grade; that is. the lowest ground touching the structure? (Provide elevation to nearest tenth of a foot and datum)' ■A Elevation/Datum 12. If fill has been/will be placed to elevate the structures) on this property, what is the existing or proposed elevation of the lowest floor, Including basement and/or attached garage? (Provide elevation to nearest tenth of a foot and datum)* 11t Elevation/Datum 13. if any of the above elevations were computed based on a datum different than the effective PIS, what is the conversion factor? PIS Datum = Local Datum +/- NA Feet *For multiple lots/structures, complete the appropriate column(s) of the Summary, of Elevations - Individual Lot Breakdown form, identifying the elevation for each lot/structure. To support Items 9, 10, and 11, please note a map (certified by a licensed surveyor or registered professional engineer) may be required to relate the ground elevations and locations of structures or lots. The map should indicate whether it reflects "as- built" or "proposed" conditions. I4. All information submitted in support of this request is correct to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1001. 0- Name: RONALD Y MORRISON, P.E.. C.F.R. (pleose print or type) Title: Smug OR HYDROLOG I rT - (pleaw print or type) Rbgistration No. 36fiS1 Expiration Date 3/31/98 St a t e TEXAS Telephone Number: (81Z) (i„6!i-7882 Signature 7 Date sealroptionar Elevation Information form MT -1 Form 2 Page 2 of 2 r- FIDIRAL IMINGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FEMA USE ONLY CERTINCATIO OF FI PLACEMENT O.M.R. Na 1067 -0147 4*01 d 1. July I"? t rVBLIV BUKUNN DISCLOSURE NOTICE 7 ublic reporting burden for this form is estimated to average .35 hour per response. The burden estimate includes the ... I time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing and reviewing tf)e form. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden, tu: Inrurmation Collections Management, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 600 C Strnt. S.W., Washi�n, DC 20472. You are not reyuirsd tp respond to Ibis collection of information unless a vaiid OMB Control Number is displayed in the upper rigbt corn or this forth. r PPFa a . T IEZ gS O * vrsv *ear FetaTt_t Caa reyrcrnst winluany Name ne rte meer reM The Fill is: -_ - Q VNIsting ❑ proposed A.1—BUILT I hereby certify that fill placed on the property to raise the ground surface to or above the base (100 year) flood elevation in order to gain exclusion from a Special Flood Hazard Area (100 year floodplain) sheets the criteria of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 65.54)(6), listed below. For orpipp d Cll, i hereby certJy the it is designed in accordance with these criteria. SEE ATTACHED CERTIFICATION I. That the fill has been compacted to 95 percent of the maximum density obtainable with the Standard Proetor Test method or an acceptable equivalent method for (check one of the following) -x a. Fill pads prepared for the foundations of residential or commercia) structures b. Entire legally defined parcel (Note: if the locWton i /ill uuer the entire legal defined parcel most be L1iiiVID A LEAS, P.E. #1 not been determined, the Lboue criieriai). muter e0 w• Print or type i •% !•.. «...,s'� `�t _ _ • DAVID A. LEWIS _ nature x,, . 47040 1 ____ . _SE PrEMBER 26, 1997 Dete *1 4 y. 0 7 ��f Tide M Ltati6n N1usb.r 2. 'rhaL fill slupos fur granular materials an not steeper than one vertical on one - and - one -half harixunLal ( steePer alve--4 rrtual be justified); end 3. That xduquute erosion protection is provided for fill slopes exposed to moving nom waters (slopes exposed to /toms with s►rlurities of up to S feet per second (fps) during the 130 year lood must, at a Minimum. be protected by v permanent couerofgrass, votes, wredtt, or similar uegelation; slopes exposed to /louts with uelarities greater that 51 during Uhf IOO -,year /rood roust, at a minimum, be protected by appropriu oly rift igned alone, roc. c ,concrete, or other durable products). N IEWC (pie-aim! print m type) mature L - Truie afws aRriBei - M �ia,nywr. l °LEA51•: Ith : }'k ;11'VO I'll l: IN 8 ' 1 '1( UCI'IONS FOU I'HBAPPROI*KIATE MAI LINO ADIJU11S t mik Form 11.470, MA 96 CrnUltatlon of FIN pletontent Form MT. form 3 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS ",JESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING DALLAS, TEXAS PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS .-TEST DATA: DATE 09/24/97 OUR REPORT NO. 97224-72 TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE % MAXIMUM LAB DRY DENSITY PCF IN PLACE MOISTURE % IN PLACE DRY DENS PCF PERCH COMPACTION COMMENT 292 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.0 91 97 1 -A 1 290 1291 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.0 90 96 1 -A 292 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.3 91 98 1 -A L 2 - 93 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.8 92 98 1 -A 294 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 28.0 89 95 1 -A 295 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.8 91 97 1 -A ,296 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.9 93 1 100 1 -A 'EST LOCATION: 290 BLOCK A, PAD 4 291 BLOCK A, PAD 5 292 BLOCK A, PAD 7 1 293 BLOCK A, PAD 13 294 BLOCK A, PAD 14 295 BLOCK A, PAD 20 296 rBLOCK A, PAD 21 FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS �. NATURAL SUBGRADE S. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS Resp mitted 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS -4 CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST LPHA TI G, INC. :1301083-18 _ . ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING DALLAS, TEXAS RIVERVIEW ESTATES PROJECT COPPELL , TEXAS ,JEST DATA: REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS DATE OUR REPORT NO. 09/24/97 97224 -72A ES TEST DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOIS MAXIMUM LAB DRY IN PLACE MOISTURE IN PLACE DRY DENSITY COM ON COMMENT' 297 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.4 93 100 1 -A 298 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.4 90 96 1 -A 299 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 28.3 90 96 1 -A 1� 0 - 0 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.3 91 97 1 -A 301 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.9 90 97 1 -A 302 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.9 90 96 1 -A 303 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.8 91 98 1 -A FCT 1 (V:eTIf1A1- 97 BLOCK A, PAD 23 298 BLOCK B, PAD 1 99 BLOCK B, PAD 3 300 BLOCK B, PAD 5 301 BLOCK B, PAD 7 302 BLOCK B, PAD 8 303 BLOCK B, PAD 9 .... FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS _. NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS Res S 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS j. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST ALP ING INC. G01083 - 18 neiri A (pat 1 gtimf f"Ar ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR PROJECT HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCH ENGINEERING DALLAS, TEXAS DATE 09/24/97 RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -72B .JEST DATA: TT ES ES DATE ELEV. SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE 25.3 MAXIMUM LAB DRY PDM rrY 93.4 IN PLACE MOIS 26.8 IN PLACE DRY POF 89 PERCENT �P�ON 95 COMMENT' 1 -A 304 09/24 FG 4 [305 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.7 90 97 1 -A 306 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.3 89 96 1 -A 07 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 28.3 88 95 1-A 308 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.4 90 96 1 -A 309 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.4 89 96 1 -A [310 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.3 90 96 1 -A EST LOCATION: L304 BLOCK B, PAD 11 305 BLOCK B, PAD 12 306 BLOCK B, PAD 15 [307 BLOCK B, PAD 17 308 BLOCK B, PAD 18 09 BLOCK B, PAD 21 310 BLOCK B, PAD 23 FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS Respectfully 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS .b CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST �_ALPH STING, C. G01083 -18 n- /oa4 t 0 5 tr.o+- ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS HUFFINES & PARTNERS TESTED FOR C/O CCM ENGINEERING DALLAS, TEXAS RIVERVIEW ESTATES PROJECT COPPELL, TEXAS 0— ,TEST DATA: DATE OUR REPORT NO. 09/24/97 97224 -72C NOT DATE ELEV. DEPTH I NUM BER OPTIMUM MOISTURE MAXIMUM LAB DRY P m IN PLACE MOI %RE IN PLACE DRY P DENSITY PERCE COMPACTION COMMENT' 311 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.0 90 96 1 -A 312 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.4 90 97 1 -A 313 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.4 90 97 1 -A 1 314 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.2 91 97 1 -A 315 09/24 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.5 89 96 1 -A EST LOCATION: 311 BLOCK B, PAD 24 312 BLOCK C, PAD 1 313 BLOCK C, PAD 2 314 BLOCK C, PAD 7 315 BLOCK C, PAD 8 FILL . A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS Respectfully Su ed NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST HAT NG, NC. :G01083 -18 DBVJ d (PRt) Stetfn— 9- ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING 0- PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: p- DATE 09/22/97 OUR REPORT NO. 97224-69 TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE MAXIMUM LAB DRY DENSITY MOIST IN PLACE RE IN PLACE DRY PDEENSITY PERCENT COMPACTION COMMENT* 246 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.5 90 97 1 -A 247 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.9 90 97 1 -A 248 09/22 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 27.1 90 97 1 -A r249 09/22 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 27.0 90 96 1 -A 250 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.3 89 95 1 -A 51 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.5 93 99 1 -A 252 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.4 92 99 1 -A EST LOCATION: 1 246 BLOCK A, PAD 24 247 BLOCK A, PAD 25 46 BLOCK A, PAD 26 1 249 BLOCK A, PAD 27 250 BLOCK A, PAD 27 � 51 BLOCK-A, PAD 28 252 BLOCK A, PAD 29 . FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS Ily mitt 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST :G01083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC REPORT OF FIELD .. Dallas, Texas 75229 Suite 100 �� COMPACTION TESTS (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS DATE 09/22/97 OUR REPORT NO. 97224 TEST DATA: TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE % MAXIMUM LAB DRY DENSITY PCF IN PLACE MOISTURE % IN PLACE DRY DENSITY PCF P ENT COMPACTION COMMENT" 253 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.1 92 99 1 -A n � - 09/22 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 27.7 91 97 1 -A 255 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.9 91 98 1 -A 1 256 09/22 FG -0.6 4 25.3 93.4 26.6 92 98 1 -A 257 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.1 90 97 1 -A 258 09/22 FG -0.6 4 25.3 93.4 26.4 92 99 1--A 259 09/22 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 25.3 93 100 1 -A (EST LOCATION: 1253 BLOCK A, PAD 30 254 BLOCK B, PAD 3 255 BLOCK B, PAD 4 256 BLOCK B, PAD 5 257 BLOCK B, PAD 6 258 BLOCK B, PAD 9 259 BLOCK B, PAD 10 FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS !. NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS R U y S 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST T ,i„T INC :1301083 18 ...mss.., ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES 6 PARTNERS DATE 09/22/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -69B COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: .- EST TEST DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE MAXIMUM LAB DRY DE N SITY IN PLACE MOIS IN PLACE DRY PITY PERCENT COMPACTION COMMENT' 60 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.5 92 99 1 —A z61 09/22 FG -0.6 4 25.3 93.4 26.6 90 97 1 —A 262 09/22 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 28.1 91 97 1 —A [.263 09/22 FG -1.0 4 25.3 93.4 26.5 92 99 1 —A 264 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.9 92 98 1 —A L 65 09/22 FG -1.5 4 25.3 93.4 25.7 93 99 1 —A 266 09/22 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 25.4 93 99 1 —A owl EST LOCATION: L 2 6 0 BLOCK B, PAD 10 ?61 BLOCK B, PAD 11 .62 BLOCK B, PAD 12 263 BLOCK B, PAD 13 -64 BLOCK B, PAD 13 65 BLOCK B, PAD 14 266 BLOCK B, PAD 14 FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATION NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS e WSTET; 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST ST — P G01083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES ... COPPELL, TEXAS ,LEST DATA: DATE 09/22/97 OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -69C EST TEST ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTU RE MAXIMUM LAB DRY PDCF� IN PLACE MOISTURE IN PLACE DRY Pc DENSITY PERCENT P� COMTION COMMENT' _67 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.9 90 96 1 -A 268 09/22 FG -1.6 4 25.3 93.4 27.2 92 98 1 -A ?69 09/22 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 26.1 92 99 1 -A 270 09/22 FG -1.0 4 25.3 93.4 27.6 90 97 1 -A >71 09/22 FIG 4 25.3 93.4 26.8 92 98 1 -A .72 09/22 FG -1.5 4 25.3 93.4 26.1 90 97 1 -A z73 09/22 FG-0.5 4 25.3 93.4 25.9 90 96 1 -A EST LOCATION: J 267 BLOCK B, PAD 14 68 BLOCK B, PAD 15 .69 BLOCK B, PAD 15 270 BLOCK B, PAD 16 :71 BLOCK B, PAD 16 72 BLOCK B, PAD 17 X73 BLOCK B, PAD 17 0- FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST G01083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. A 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 09/22/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -69D �E$T NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE MAXIMUM LAB DRY PDCEF� IN PLACE MOISTURE IN PLACE DR' DENSITY COMMPACTION 99 COMMENT` 1 -A 74 09/22 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 26.5 93 275 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.9 91 98 1 -A 76 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.4 91 97 1 -A L 277 09/22 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 28.3 90 97 1 -A 78 09/22 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 26.7 92 98 1 -A L 79 09/22 FG -1.0 4 25.3 93.4 26.1 93 99 1 -A X80 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.0 92 98 1 -A .ST LOCATION: L 2 7 4 BLOCK B, PAD 19 75 BLOCK B, PAD 19 76 BLOCK B, PAD 22 277 BLOCK B, PAD 23 78 BLOCK B, PAD 24 79 BLOCK B, PAD 25 1 - H BLOCK B, PAD 26 FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST 301083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 �„ Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: DATE 09/22/97 OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -69E TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE % MAXIMUM LAB DRY DENSITY PCF IN PLACE MOISTURE % IN PUKE DRY DENSITY PCF PERCENT COMPACTION COMMENT' 1 281 09/22 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 26.5 90 96 1 -A 282 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.9 92 99 1 -A 283 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.9 91 97 1 -A r284 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 28.3 92 98 1 -A 285 09/22 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 27.5 90 97 1 -A 286 09/22 FG -1.0 4 25.3 93.4 26.9 92 98 1 -A 287 09/22 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 26.7 93 99 1 -A 0- rEST LOCATION: 1 281 BLOCK C, PAD 1 282 BLOCK C, PAD 3 283 BLOCK C, PAD 5 284 BLOCK C PAD 6 285 BLOCK C, PAD 7 286 BLOCK C, PAD 10 287 BLOCK C, PAD 10 0— FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST :G01083 -18 i ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES ,^ COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: I- REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS DATE 09/22/97 OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -69F TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE x MAXIMUM LAB DRY DENSITY PCF IN PLACE MOISTURE x IN PLACE DRY DENSITY PCF PERCENT COMPACTION COMMENT .88 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.2 91 97 1 —A 289 09/22 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.4 92 98 1 —A =ST LOCATION: L 88 BLOCK C, PAD 10 489 BLOCK B, PAD 25 FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS WTETT NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST 301083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 DAILY FIELD REPORT •- ��, Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 09/18/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 COPPELL, TEXAS WEATHER: CLEAR TEMPERATURE RANGE: 75 TO: 95 ALPHA Representative: L THE ALPHA TECHNICIAN TRAVELED TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AS REQUESTED TO MONITOR ON —GOING WORK AND PERFORM FIELD TESTING AS REQUESTED. L WHILE ON SITE THE TECHNICIAN OBTAINED 1 SOIL SAMPLE FOR LABORATORY PROCTOR ANALYSIS. THE SAMPLE WAS OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING LOCATION: L STOCKPILE OF IMPORTED FILL MATERIAL A TOTAL OF 30 FIELD DENSITY TESTS WERE PERFORMED ON FILL FOR PAD AREA- L SEE ATTACHED REPORT FOR RESULTS OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTING. LABORATORY TEST RESULTS FOR ALL RELATED ITEMS REFERENCED ABOVE WILL FOLLOW Z ON A SEPARATE REPORT. DAVE WAS INFORMED OF ALL OBSERVATIONS AND FIELD TEST RESULTS. L AT THE COMPLETION OF THE SCHEDULED TESTING THE TECHNICIAN RETURNED TO THE I DALLAS OFFICE. 301083 -29 0- ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS "' C/O CCM ENGINEERING .- PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: p— DATE 09/18/97 OUR REPORT NO. 97224 TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTU MAXIMUM LAB DRYS m IN PLACE MOIS IN PLACE DRY DENSITY PERCENT COM COMMENT 16 09/18 FG 4 25.3 93.4 28.2 89 95 1 -A 217 09/18 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.9 91 98 1 -A 219 09/18 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 25.4 92 99 1 -A [219 09/18 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 27.9 90 97 1 -A 220 09/18 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.2 91 98 1 -A �21 09/18 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.1 91 97 1 -A 222 09/18 FG -1.0 4 25.3 93.4 27.1 90 96 1 -A ow p- 'EST LOCATION: J L6 — BLOCK A, PAD 1 217 BLOCK A PAD 3 1 218 1 BLOCK A PAD 4 219 BLOCK A, PAD 5 220 BLOCK A, PAD 6 J 221 BLOCK A, PAD 8 t22 BLOCK A, PAD 9 ... FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS J. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST / G01083 -18 O- ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 09/18/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: p— OUR REPORT NO. 97224 TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE % MAXIMUM LAS DRY DENSITY PCF IN PLACE MOISTURE x IN PLACE DRY DENSITY PCF PERCENT COMPACTION COMMENT' � 23 09/18 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.5 93 99 1 -A 224 09/18 FG -1.0 4 25.3 93.4 25.9 92 98 1 -A 229 09/18 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.6 91 97 1 -A 226 09/18 FG -2.0 4 25.3 93.4 26.2 92 99 1 -A 227 09/18 FG -1.0 4 25.3 93.4 26.6 90 97 1 -A 28 09/18 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.9 91 98 1-A 129 09/18 FG -2.0 4 25.3 93.4 26.4 91 97 1 -A w =QT I nreTInN- [223 BLOCK A, PAD 9 224 BLOCK A, PAD 10 25 BLOCK A, PAD 10 226 BLOCK A, PAD 11 227 BLOCK A, PAD 11 [228 BLOCK A, PAD 11 229 BLOCK A, PAD 12 . ^. FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS ly Itted NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST _ T C. :G01083 -18 0- ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: ... REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS DATE 09/18/97 OUR REPORT NO. 97224-68C TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE x MAXIMUM LAB DRY DENSITY PCF IN PLACE MOISTURE % IN PLACE DRY DENSITY PCF PERCENT COMPACTION COMMENT' � = 30 09/18 FG -1.0 4 25.3 93.4 27.5 89 96 1 -A 23I 09/18 FIG 4 25.3 93.4 27.6 93 99 1 -A 232 09/18 FG -1.5 4 25.3 93.4 25.7 91 97 1 -A 233 09/18 FIG 4 25.3 93.4 26.8 90 97 1 -A 234 09/18 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 26.2 90 97 1 -A 35 09/18 FG -1.0 4 25.3 93.4 26.5 91 97 1 -A 236 09/18 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.2 90 96 1 -A GCT I Clf^.OTICIN• L 23 1 0 BLOCK A, PAD 12 31 BLOCK A PAD 12 -32 BLOCK A, PAD 13 233 BLOCK A, PAD 13 34 BLOCK A, PAD 14 L 2 3 5 BLOCK A, PAD 15 >36 BLOCK A, PAD 15 FILL * A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS Re I itt s. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST P T P T TTN G01083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS 0 TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 09/18/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: .• OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -68D TEST NO. 37 DATE 09/18 ELEV. DEPTH FG SOIL ID NUMBER 4 OPTIMUM MOISTURE % 25.3 MAXIMUM LAB DRY DENSITY PCF 93.4 IN PLACE MOISTURE % 25.9 IN PLACE DRY DENSITY PCF 91 PERCENT COMPAC 1ON 98 COMMENT' 1 -A E 8 09/18 FIG 4 25.3 93.4 26.2 92 99 1 -A 239 09/18 FG -1.0 4 25.3 93.4 25.8 91 97 1 -A [240 09/18 FG 4 25.3 93.4 25.4 92 99 1 -A 7.41 09/18 FG -1.0 4 25.3 93.4 26.1 91 97 1 -A 42 09/18 FG 4 25.3 93.4 26.1 91 98 1 -A 243 09/18 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 26.2 91 97 1-A =QT 1 n(ATInhl- L237 BLOCK A, PAD 16 7.38 BLOCK A, PAD 17 39 BLOCK A, PAD 18 240 BLOCK A, PAD 18 Z41 BLOCK A, PAD 19 42 BLOCK A, PAD 19 243 BLOCK A, PAD 20 ^, FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS #G, NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST A G01083 -18 p T ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 09/18/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -68E COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE % MAXIMUM LAB DRY DENSITY PCF IN PLACE MOISTURE % IN PLACE DRY DENSITY PCF TEST COMP COMMENT' 244 09/18 FG -0.5 4 25.3 93.4 26.1 92 - 99 1 —A 245 09/18 FG 4 25.3 93.4 27.3 90 97 1 —A •ccT I r%rAT1(1N- 1244 BLOCK A, PAD 21 245 BLOCK A t PAD 22 L ~. FILL • A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 1 NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST TIN C. P STETT R •G01083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES .- COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: p— REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS DATE 07/30/97 OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -27 TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE % MAXIMUM LAB DRY DENSITY PCF IN PLACE MOISTURE % IN PLACE DRY DENSITY PCF PERCENT COMPACTION COMMENT• 183 07/30 FG -1.0 2 20.5 99.5 22.5 95 95 1 -A 184 07/30 FG -0.5 2 20.5 99.5 21.1 97 98 1 -A 185 07/30 FG 2 20.5 99.5 21.3 96 96 1 -A L186 07/30 FG -1.1 2 20.5 99.5 20.7 97 97 1 -A 187 07/30 FG -1.5 2 20.5 99.5 21.8 96 97 1 -A 188 07/30 FG -1.0 2 20.5 99.5 21.0 96 96 1 -A 189 07/30 1 FG 1 2 1 20.5 1 99.5 21.9 95 95 1 -A =Qr 1 rW ArinK1- L 183 BLOCK C, PAD # 3 184 BLOCK C, PAD # 6 195 BLOCK C, PAD # 9 186 BLOCK B, PAD #26 187 BLOCK B, PAD #24 288 BLOCK B, PAD #22 189 BLOCK B, PAD #20 .•. FILL • A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS R I 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST ALPHA ST n , -- 301083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS •' C/O CCM ENGINEERING 0- PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS DATE 07/30/97 OUR REPORT NO. 97224-27A r•. ELEV. SOIL ID OPTIMUM MAXIMUM LAB IN PUKE IN PLACE PERCENT TEST DATE MOISTURE DRY DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY COMPACTION COMMENT' NO. DEPTH NUMBER x PCF % PCF 190 07/30 FG -0.7 2 20.5 99.5 20.8 97 97 1 —A 191 07/30 FG -2.0 2 20.5 99.5 22.9 95 95 1 —A l r • "EST LOCATION: 1 190 BLOCK B, PAD #18 191 BLOCK B, PAD #16 L s . FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS �^ !. NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS Res a bmitted / J. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST P TIN N -- STE :GO1083 -18 r • "EST LOCATION: 1 190 BLOCK B, PAD #18 191 BLOCK B, PAD #16 L s . FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS �^ !. NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS Res a bmitted / J. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST P TIN N -- STE :GO1083 -18 s . FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS �^ !. NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS Res a bmitted / J. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST P TIN N -- STE :GO1083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFF INES & PARTNERS DATE 07/29/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING �� PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES •— COPPELL, TEXAS -TEST DATA: OUR REPORT NO. 97224-26 TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE % MAXIMUM LAS DRY DENSITY PCF IN PLACE MOISTURE % IN PLACE DRY DENSITY PCF PERCENT COMPACTION COMMENT' 173 BLOCK FG -0.5 2 20.5 99.5 21.0 96 97 1 —A 171 07/29 172 07/29 FG 2 20.5 99.5 20.6 97 98 1 —A 173 07/29 FG -0.5 2 20.5 99.5 22.9 95 96 1 -A 174 07/29 FG -1.0 2 20.5 99.5 20.8 96 97 1 —A 175 07/29 FG -2.0 2 20.5 99.5 22.0 96 97 1 —A 176 07/29 FG 2 20.5 99.5 22.5 95 95 1 —A 177 07/29 FG -1.0 2 20.5 99.5 20.9 97 97 1 —A [ 171 BLOCK A PAD #1 172 BLOCK A, PAD #2 173 BLOCK A, PAD #3 L 174 BLOCK A, PAD #8 175 BLOCK A, PAD #9 r 176 BLOCK B, PAD #2 177 BLOCK B, PAD #4 sm FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS ctfulty itte NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST H ESTI � , I ST :1301083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFF INES & PARTNERS DATE 07/29/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -26A COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: TEST ES ITS DATE 07/29 ELEV. DEPTH FG -1.2 SOIL ID NUMBER 2 MOISTURE % 20.5 DRY DEET SITYY PcF 99.5 MOISTURE % 22.0 DRY DENSITY PcF 96 PERCENT COMPACTION 96 COMMENT* 1 —A 179 07/29 FG -0.6 2 20.5 99.5 21.7 96 96 1 —A 180 07/29 FG -1.5 2 20.5 99.5 20.9 97 98 1 —A 181 07/29 FG -1.5 2 20.5 99.5 22.6 96 97 1—A 182 07/29 FG -2.5 2 20.5 99.5 20.5 97 98 1 —A 176 BLOCK B, PAD # 6 179 BLOCK B, PAD # 8 180 BLOCK B, PAD #10 lel BLOCK B, PAD #12 182 BLOCK B, PAD #14 FILL NATURAL SUBGRADE 3. LIME STABILIZED 4. CEMENT TREATED G01083 -18 A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS wily nbm B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS G D. RETEST STS r ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING DATE 07/28/97 PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 COPPELL, TEXAS ' „.TEST DATA: TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPT SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM "pl �� MAXIMUM LAB ° p IN PLACE MOIS ' IN PLACE DRY PCFS' 07/28 FG -1. FG -2.0 2 20.5 99.5 23.5 94 160 07/28 FG -2.0 2 20.5 99.5 23.2 95 161 07/28 FG -1.5 2 20.5 99.5 22.6 95 162 07/28 FG -1.5 2 20.5 99.5 22.5 9E 163 07/28 FG -1.1 2 20.5 99.5 20.9 9E 164 07/28 FG -1.5 2 20.5 99.5 21.8 95 165 - 07/28 PE RCENT COMMENT' COMPACTION 1. FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS by Mod 2. NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST CGO1083 -18 " M A , ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT. OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 07/28/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING r PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS ,ZEST DATA OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -25A TEST NO, DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER oPTIMuM MOISTURE % 20.5 20.5 MAXIMUM LAB DRY DENSITY PCIF 99.5 99.5 IN PLACE MOISTURE % 21.4 22.3 IN PLACE DRY DENSITY PcF 97 95 PERCENT 00MPACTroN 97 COMMENT' 1 - A -A 166 07/28 07/28 FG -2.5 FG -1.5 G -1.0 2 2 2 167 168 07/28 169 BLOCK FFG- ..5 2 20.5 99.5 21.1 9 PAD ' 169 07/28 07/28 FIG 2 20.5 99.5 21.5 9 - 170 G CJ I LVVP%I [WIN. BLOCK A, PAD 27 166 167 BLOCK A t PAD 27 BLOCK A, PAD 28 168 169 BLOCK C, PAD 2 170 BLOCK C, PAD 4 7 FILL - A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTUREAND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS R fully S bm' . NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS C ,-4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST :GO1083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFF INES & PARTNERS DATE 07/25/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -24 COPPRLL, TEXAS 1 C71 LVVAI Ivy.. 146 BLOCK A, PAD # 1 ,147 BLOCK A, PAD # 3 148 TEST DATA: TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE MAXIMUM LAS DRY DENSITY 99.5 IN PUCE MOISTURE 21.2 IN PLACE DRY DENSITY C 97 PERCENT COMPACTION COMPACTION 97 COMMENT' 1 -A 146 07/25 FG -1.5 2 20.5 FG -1.6 2 20.5 99.5 22.2 95 96 1 -A 147 07/25 FG -1.5 2 20.5 99.5 22.5 98 98 1 -A 148 07/25 FG -1.0 2 20.5 99.5 21.7 96 96 1 -A 149 07/25 FG -2.0 2 20.5 99.5 21.6 95 96 1 -A 150 07/25 FG -3.0 2 20.5 99.5 21.5 97 97 1 -A 151 07/25 FG -2.0 2 20.5 99.5 21.1 98 98 1 -A 152 07/25 1 C71 LVVAI Ivy.. 146 BLOCK A, PAD # 1 ,147 BLOCK A, PAD # 3 148 BLOCK A, PAD # 5 149 BLOCK A, PAD # 6 150 BLOCK A, PAD # 8 151 BLOCK A, PAD # 9 152 BLOCK A l , PAD #10 ^ 1. FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS Respectfully Sub ted 2. NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS n 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST - STE CGO1083 -18 - j ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR DATE 07/25/97 AUFFINES & PARTNERS C/0 CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -24A COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: TEST NO. 153 154 DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER MOIS 20.5 MAXIMUM LAB DRY DENSITY MOI 99.5 IN PLACE SURE 22.5 IN PLACE DRY DENSITY PCF 94 PERCENT COMPACTION 95 COMMENT' 1 —A 07/25 FG -3.0 2 PAD 2 20.5 99.5 20.5 97 97 1—A 07/25 FG-3.0 2 20.5 99.5 20.9 97 98 1 —A 155 156 157 1- 1 - 58 07/25 FG -2.5 2 20.5 99.5 21.4 95 96 1 —A 07/25 FG -1.5 2 20.5 99.5 22.5 95 95 1 —A 07/25 FG -2.0 2 20.5 99.5 21.6 96 96 1 —A 07/25 FG -1.0 EST LOCATION: J 153 - 1 BLOCK A, PA #11 154 BLOCK A, PAD #12 155 BLOCK A, PAD #13 156 BLOCK A, PAD #14 157 BLOCK A, PAD #15 158 BLOCK A, PAD #16 0 7 FILL • A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS egpeCtfully Submitte NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS A I i I 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST T STET :GO1083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 07/23/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -23 COPPELL, TEXAS ,VEST DATA: TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER �tuM � %RE MAXIMUM LAB DRY � ITM IN PACE MOIS IN oav PLACE srtr PCF COMPACTION COMMENT' 134 135 PAD 4 136 20.5 99.5 22.6 94 95 1 -A 07/23 FG -1.5 2 FG -1.1 2 20.5 99.5 22.1 96 96 1 -A 07/23 FG -1.5 2 20.5 99.5 20.6 98 98 1 -A 136 07/23 J 137 138 139 FG -0.5 2 20.5 99.5 20.6 97 97 1 -A 07/23 FG -2.5 2 20.5 99.5 21.2 97 97 1 -A 07/23 FG -1.5 2 20.5 99.5 20.9 98 98 1 -A 07/23 1140 FG -1.2 2 20.5 99.5 21.3 97 97 1 -A 07/23 'EST LOCATION: 134 BLOCK C , PAD 2 135 BLOCK C, PAD 4 136 BLOCK C, PAD 6 137 BLOCK C, PAD 8 138 BLOCK C, PAD 10 139 BLOCK C, PAD 10 140 BLOCK A, PAD 30 ... FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS Re U '. NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS ALPHA TEST 1 _j. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST PT ST 'G01083 -18 - ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR PROJECT ,TEST DATA: TEST NO. 141 142 143 144 145 HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS DATE 07/23/97 OUR REPORT NO. 97224 DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL � 20.5 D DE S� 99.5 M 22.5 DRY PLACE 96 SP �N 96 COMMENT' 1--A 0 FG -2.1 2 PAD FG -2.5 2 20.5 99.5 21.7 95 95 1 -A 07/23 FG -1.2 2 20.5 99.5 21.9 97 98 1 -A 07/23 FG -1.0 2 20.5 99.5 21.3 96 97 1 -A 07/23 FG -2.5 2 20.5 99.5 22.0 96 96 1 -A 07/23 TEST LOCATION: 141 BLOCK A, PAD 28 142 BLOCK A, PAD 26 143 BLOCK A, PAD 24 144 BLOCK BLOCK A, A, PAD PAD 22 20 145 ^1. FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS pectfully SU fitted 2. NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS �c — 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST pp, R CGO1083.18 ,A ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., suite 100 DAILY FIELD REPORT Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 f HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 07/22/97 TESTED FOR C/O CCM ENGINEERING ^PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -22 COPPELL, TEXAS WEATHER: CLEAR !�^ TEMPERATURE RANGE: 7 TO: 95 f , ALPHA Representative: J .B. THE ALPHA TECHNICIAN TRAVELED TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AS REQUESTED TO MONITOR ON —GOING WORK AND PERFORM FIELD TESTING AS REQUESTED. SUBGRADE FOR PADS 1 THROUGH 10, BLOCK C WAS OBSERVED TO VERIFY THAT AREAS HAD BEEN PREPARED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. L A TOTAL OF 15 FIELD DENSITY TESTS WERE PERFORMED ON FILL AND NATURAL SUBGRADE FOR PAD FILL AREA. SEE ATTACHED REPORT FOR RESULTS OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTING. THE SINACOLA REPRESENTATIVE WAS INFORMED OF ALL OBSERVATIONS AND FIELD TEST RESULTS. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE SCHEDULED TESTING THE TECHNICIAN RETURNED TO THE DALLAS OFFICE. L L L 901083 -29 ALPHA 00 '�_ PAT 55? mlo�� ALPHA TESTING, INC. / 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 i (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 07/22/97 "— C/O CCM ENGINEERING RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -22A PROJECT COPPELL, TEXAS :ST LOCATION: L119 BLOCK C, PAD 1 120 BLOCK C, PAD 3 121 BLOCK C, PAD 5 122 BLOCK C, PAD 7 123 BLOCK C, PAD 9 124 BLOCK B, PAD 1 125 BLOCK B, PAD 3 .r FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIF ONS Respectfull miffed NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS P Eg��IC. 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST E T I � x G01083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 07/22/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -22B COPPELL, TEXAS SST DATA: ELEV. SOIL ID OPTIMUM DRY N MAXIMUM LAB IN PLACE IN PLACE TEST DATE NUMBER MOISTURE DRY DENSITY MOISK RE Cp RR PA a+ COMMENT' NO. DEPTH PCF 126 127 07/22 FG -2.0 2 20.5 9 A, PAD 17 128 BLOCK _ 2 2 20.5 20.5 99.5 99.5 21.3 21.4 96 96 9 ' -A 07/22 FG -2.0 128 07/22 FG -3.0 2 2 20.5 20.5 99.5 99.5 21.4 21.7 94 9 9 ' -A 129 130 131 1 132 07/22 FG -3.0 07/22 FG -3.5 2 20.5 99.5 22.0 9 - 07/22 FG -2.5 1 2 20.5 99.5 20.6 96 ' 07/22 FG -2.0 .ST LOCATION: 126 BLOCK A, PAD 16 127 BLOCK A, PAD 17 128 BLOCK A, PAD 18 129 BLOCK A, PAD 19 130 BLOCK A, PAD 20 131 BLOCK A, PAD 21 132 $LOCK A, PAD 22 s PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS FILL NATURAL SUBGRADE A. IN Respectfully B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST PAT G01083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS w TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 07/22/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING w PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS ,JEST DATA: TEST DATE ELEV. I SOIL ID NO. DEPTH NUMBER 133 07/22 FG -0.5 2 EST LOCATION: 133 BLOCK A, PAD 23 OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -22C DRY PERCENT I COMMENT' COMPACTION FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS peCtfuIly Subm' ed NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS PAA PHA T INC. 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST R :G01083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 wisconsin St., Suite 100 DAILY FIELD REPORT .. ��, Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 L SUBGRADE FOR PADS 25 THROUGH 30, BLOCK A; AND PADS 1 THROUGH 5, BLOCK B; AND PADS 22 THROUGH 26, BLOCK B WAS OBSERVED TO VERIFY THAT AREAS HAD BEEN PREPARED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. I A TOTAL OF 8 FIELD DENSITY TESTS WERE PERFORMED ON FILL AND NATURAL SUBGRADE FOR VARIOUS AREA. SEE ATTACHED REPORT FOR RESULTS OF FIELD 1 COMPACTION TESTING. THE SINACOLA REPRESENTATIVE WAS INFORMED OF ALL OBSERVATIONS AND FIELD TEST RESULTS. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE SCHEDULED TESTING THE TECHNICIAN RETURNED TO THE 1 DALLAS OFFICE. 1 1 G01083 -29 Respectful ubmitteci PAT ALPHA STING, INQ�_, 07/17/97 HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE TESTED FOR C/0 CCM ENGINEERING .., PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 COPPELL, TEXAS CLEAR I WEATHER: TEMPERATURE RANGE: 75 TO: 95 ALPHA Representative: J.B. 1 THE ALPHA TECHNICIAN TRAVELED T OE AS QUESTED TO MONITOR ON —GOING WORK AND ERFORM F TEST NG AS REQUE L SUBGRADE FOR PADS 25 THROUGH 30, BLOCK A; AND PADS 1 THROUGH 5, BLOCK B; AND PADS 22 THROUGH 26, BLOCK B WAS OBSERVED TO VERIFY THAT AREAS HAD BEEN PREPARED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. I A TOTAL OF 8 FIELD DENSITY TESTS WERE PERFORMED ON FILL AND NATURAL SUBGRADE FOR VARIOUS AREA. SEE ATTACHED REPORT FOR RESULTS OF FIELD 1 COMPACTION TESTING. THE SINACOLA REPRESENTATIVE WAS INFORMED OF ALL OBSERVATIONS AND FIELD TEST RESULTS. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE SCHEDULED TESTING THE TECHNICIAN RETURNED TO THE 1 DALLAS OFFICE. 1 1 G01083 -29 Respectful ubmitteci PAT ALPHA STING, INQ�_, ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 07/17/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -21A TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER 2 MOISTURE STt� % 20.5 DRY DENSITY PCF 9 MOISTUR % DRY DENS PC C OMPACTION COMMENT' — M111 07/17 SG +2.5 112 07/17 SG +3.0 2 20.5 99.5 22.7 98 98 1 —A 113 07/17 SG 3 22.2 93.8 23.2 93 99 2 —A 114 07/17 SG 3 22.2 93.8 25.2 91 97 2 —A 115 07/17 SG 3 22.2 93.8 24.9 91 97 2 —A 116 07/17 SG 3 22.2 93.8 24.8 89 95 2 —A 117 07/17 SG 3 22.2 93.8 23.4 92 99 2 —A . r[.T I A/�ATIA \1. L ill RIVERVIEW DRIVE AT STATION #2 +50 112 RIVERVIEW DRIVE AT STATION #2 +50 113 BLOCK A, PAD 25 L Li BLOCK A, PAD 27 115 BLOCK A, PAD 29 L 116 BLOCK B, PAD 23 117 BLOCK B, PAD 25 FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS espectfully Subm ed NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST G01083 -18 ___ ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 w TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES w COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS DATE OUR REPORT NO. 07/17/97 97224 -21B PEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER MOISTURE % DR Y D � m PCF MOISTTU % DRY DENS P� COMPACTIO COMPACTION 118 07/17 SG 3 22.2 93.8 23.9 - A :ST LOCATION: 1 1181 BLOCK B, w FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS Respectfully Sub itted NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST PmP 301083 -18 / ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 DAILY FIELD REPORT /��, Dallas, Texas 75229 , A (972) 620 -8911 { HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 07/16/97 TESTED FOR C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 COPPELL, TEXAS WEATHER: CLOUDY TEMPERATURE RANGE: 75 TO: 95 ALPHA Representative: J. 13. THE ALPHA TECHNICIAN TRAVELED TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AS REQUESTED TO MONITOR ON -GOING WORK AND PERFORM FIELD TESTING AS REQUESTED. SUBGRADE FOR PADS 14 THROUGH 21, BLOCK B WAS OBSERVED TO VERIFY THAT AREAS HAD BEEN PREPARED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. A TOTAL OF 14 FIELD DENSITY TESTS WERE PERFORMED ON FILL AND NATURAL SUBGRADE FOR PAD FILL AREA. SEE ATTACHED REPORT FOR RESULTS OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTING. 'THE SINACOLA REPRESENTATIVE WAS INFORMED OF ALL OBSERVATIONS AND FIELD TEST RESULTS. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE SCHEDULED TESTING THE TECHNICIAN RETURNED TO THE DALLAS OFFICE. Respectfully Subs ALPHA TESTING, INC. 01083.29 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS DATE 07/16/97 0— PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: .. OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -20A ES T T NO DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTU MAxIMLIM LAB DRY PDCP� IN PLACE MOISTURE IN PLACE DRY P DEE DENSITY PERCENT COMPACTION COMMENT' 3 22.2 93.8 24.3 92 98 2 —A 97 07/16 SG 98 �L 07/16 SG 3 22.2 93.8 23.7 92 98 2 —A 99 07/16 — SG 3 22.2 93.8 24.4 90 96 2 —A 1100 L 101 07/16 SG 3 22.2 93.8 23.0 93 99 2—A 07/16 SG 3 22.2 93.8 24.7 92 98 2 —A 102 07/16 SG 3 22.2 93.8 23.9 91 97 2 —A 103 07/16 FG -1.2 2 20.5 99.5 21.5 94 95 1 —A .. EST LOCATION: 101 1 102 103 ^. FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS Respectfully Subm NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS s. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST P T; :G01083 -18 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 07/16/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS „TEST DATA: TEST LOCATION: OUR REPORT NO. 97224-20B TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE % MAXIMUM LAB DRY DENSITY PCF IN PLACE MOISTURE % IN PLACE DRY DENSITY PCF 95 PERCENT A 95 COMMENT` 1-A 104 07/16 FG -1.7 2 20.5 99.5 21.6 105 07/16 FG -2.0 2 20.5 99.5 21.0 95 96 1 -A 106 07/16 FG -3.2 2 20.5 99.5 20.8 95 96 1 -A 107 07/16 FG -3.1 2 20.5 99.5 22.0 95 95 1 -A 108 07/16 FG -4.0 2 20.5 99.5 20.9 98 98 1 -A 109 07/16 FG -2.5 2 20.5 99.5 21.4 96 96 1 -A 110 07/16 FG -3.0 2 20.5 99.5 21.6 95 96 1 -A t. FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS espectfully Submitt 2. NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST P 0GO1083 -18 - ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Sure 100 DAILY FIELD REPORT ��, Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 07/15/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -19 COPPELL, TEXAS WEATHER: CLOUDY TEMPERATURE RANGE: 5 TO: 9 5 ALPHA Repmwntafire: J.B L THE ALPHA TECHNICIAN TRAVELED TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AS REQUESTED TO MONITOR ON -GOING WORK AND PERFORM FIELD TESTING AS REQUESTED. SUBGRADE FOR PADS 1 THROUGH 24, BLOCK A AND PADS 6 THROUGH 13, BLOCK B WAS OBSERVED TO VERIFY THAT AREAS HAD BEEN PREPARED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. A TOTAL OF 19 FIELD DENSITY TESTS WERE PERFORMED ON FILL AND NATURAL SUBGRADE FOR VARIOUS AREAS. SEE ATTACHED REPORT FOR RESULTS OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTING. THE SINACOLA REPRESENTATIVE WAS INFORMED OF ALL OBSERVATIONS AND FIELD 1 TEST RESULTS. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE SCHEDULED TESTING THE TECHNICIAN RETURNED TO THE 1 DALLAS OFFICE. 1 1 301083 -29 ALPHA Submitted PAT ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES ., COPPELL, TEXAS ,.JEST DATA: REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS DATE 07/15/97 OUR REPORT NO. 97224-19A EST TEST DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE MAXIMUM LAS DRY DEN IN PUKE MOISTURE IN PLACE DRY D ENSITY PERCENT COMPACTION COMMENT" 78 07/15 SG 3 22.2 93.8 22.4 93 99 2 — A 79 07/15 SG +0.5 2 20.5 99.5 22.1 96 97 1 —A 80 07/15 SG +1.0 2 20.5 99.5 22.2 97 97 1 —A 8 07/15 SG +1.5 2 20.5 99.5 22.2 96 96 1 —A 82 07/15 SG +2.0 2 20.5 99.5 23.5 95 95 1 —A � 83 07/15 SG 3 22.2 93.8 22.2 89 95 2 —A 84 07/15 SG 3 22.2 93.8 22.5 89 95 2 —A OF 'COT 1 APATIn1J- -78 RIVERVIEW DRIVE AT STATION #2 +50 79 RIVERVIEW DRIVE AT STATION #2 +50 80 RIVERVIEW DRIVE AT STATION #2 +50 81 RIVERVIEW DRIVE AT STATION #2 +50 82 RIVERVIEW DRIVE AT STATION #2 +50 1 83 BLOCK A, PAD 1 s4 BLOCK A, PAD 3 w FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS spectfully Sub fitted _. NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS ,4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST ALPHA TE , INC. PAT S NER :G01083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS ,TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 07/15/97 C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS --'rFRT DATA: OUR REPORT NO. 97224 -19B TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOISTURE x MAXIMUM LAB DRY DENSITY PCF IN PLACE MOISTURE x IN PLACE DRY DENSITY PCF CPS COMMENT' 85 07/15 SG 3 22.2 93.8 23.6 90 96 2 —A F6 07/15 SG 3 22.2 93.8 24.2 90 96 2 —A 87 07/15 SG 3 22.2 93.8 24.9 89 95 2 —A s8 07/15 SG 3 22.2 93.8 23.2 90 96 2 —A 89 07/15 SG. 3 22.2 93.8 23.7 90 96 2 —A lb 90 07/15 SG 3 22.2 93.8 22.5 91 97 2 —A 191 07/15 SG 3 22.2 93.8 23.0 91 97 1 2 —A F85 BLOCK A, PAD 5 86 BLOCK A, PAD 7 67 BLOCK A, PAD 9 88 BLOCK A, PAD 11 89 BLOCK A, PAD 13 90 BLOCK A, PAD 15 91 BLOCK A, PAD 17 1. FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS peCtfuliy Sub fitted 2. NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS P T INC. --4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST CGO1083 -18 ALPHA TESTING, INC. 2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75229 (972) 620 -8911 TESTED FOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS C/O CCM ENGINEERING PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES COPPELL, TEXAS TEST DATA: .. REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS DATE OUR REPORT NO. 07/15/97 97224 -19C TEST NO. DATE ELEV. DEPTH SOIL ID NUMBER OPTIMUM MOIS % MAXIMUM LAB D RY P TM IN PLACE MOISTURE IN PLACE PPCCFF PERCH COMPACTION COMMENT' 92 07/15 SG PAD 23 95 BLOCK B, PAD - �93 07/15 SG 3 22.2 93.8 23.6 90 96 2 -A 94 07/15 SG 3 22.2 93.8 25.1 90 96 2 -A r95 07/15 SG 3 22.2 93.8 22.9 92 98 2 -A 96 07/15 SG 3 22.2 93.8 22.5 93 99 2 -A . "EST LOCATION: l 92 BLOCK A PAD 19 93 BLOCK A, PAD 21 94 BLOCK A, PAD 23 95 BLOCK B, PAD 7 96 BLOCK B, PAD 9 p FILL A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS NATURAL SUBGRADE B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS BpeCtfully Subm' 3. LIME STABILIZED C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS 4. CEMENT TREATED D. RETEST P P P C. :1301083 -18 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FEMA USE ONLY wom No. 3067-0147 COMMUNITY ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF REQUESTS Exp(resluiyd 1, I"? INVOLVING FILL Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average .88 hour per response. The burden estimate Includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing and reviewing the form. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Information Collections Management, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Ct.ruat R W Washington_ DC 20472. P. P not required to respond to I In the upper right corner o Community Name unless a valid OMB Control Number is Pro"rL lW ame or A reas We hereby acknowledge receipt and review of this Letter of Map Revision request and have found that the completed or proposed project meets or Is designed to meet all of the community's applicable floodplain management regulations, Including the requirement that no fill be placed in the adopted regulatory floodway. We understand that this request is being forwarded to FEMA for a possible map revision. For proposed projects, we understand that FEMA Is being asked to provide comments on the potential effects of this project on the flood hazards of our community. Community comments on the proposed project: ? Jeo► s - h O 1 e -E" � w i 4 �' �'l. 2 �� C POI,'6.� O'1` R;,�eV ►pw- L�Qi �.e. - 4 -�-.e_ A1Dn(1nX ?w.1'r2 2�O l.�i s id O� �a�..� Community Official's N or Address: AS.S ctr kw A..: V a CO � 50 IQ (ploom print or type) FILL COMPACTION INFORMATION ATTACHED Daytime Telephone Number: C l' # 3 ;In P- D ata PLEASE RL!''EH TO THE INS't'RUCTEONB rOR THE API'ROE "RIATIC MAILI AU1)RESS r— FFMA Fmm 2147C. MAY 96 CommuMy AdrnewNt maMae Rowpo t Invelvin9 FRI Form MT-1 Form4