River Ridge Add-LR 940602 2575 Lone Star Drive · P.O. Box 224227 · Dallas, Texas 75222
(214) 631-2700 / FAX (214) 920-1891
REPORT OF
IN-PLACE DENSITY
CUENT: PSR, Znc.
Attn: Bobby Rollings
P.O. Box 796303
Dallas, TX 75379-6303 CLIENT NO.: 3452351
REPORT NO.: 11304A
PROJECT: River Ridge Addition DATE OF SERVICE: 6/01/94
Coppell, Texas AUTHORIZATION:
REPORT DATE: 6/02/94
SERVICES: Perfogm in-place density and moisture content: tests to detegmtne the degree
of field compaction.
PROJECT DATA MOISTURF_./OENSITY RELATIONS
CONTRACTOR: Parco OPTIMUM MAXIMUM
MATERIALS MOISTURE % DENSITY r)cf
TEST OF: Fill Material 94921-Tan & gray shaley, sandy 13.0 120.5
clay with gravel
METHOD OF TEST:
DENSITY: AS~M D 2922 SPECIFICATION
MOISTURE: ASTM D 3017 DENSITY: 95Z MTN. DENSTT~ MOISTURE:--.2Z O?TTlV[U~
REPORT OF TESTS
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCATION (%1 (%1 (Pcfl (Pcfl (% max)
1. Lot C/3, subgrade 14.8 13.0 117.8 120.5 98
2. Lot A/18, 2nd lift 13.4 13.0 116.6 120.5 97
Test results on this report meet project
specifications as noted above.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Technician time: See report 11304
Technician: Thomas Belew
CMl;. Technician
Report(1)(1)(1) Parco cc~ R~R,DIMributi°n: Engineering Inc. Uti [ities, thC. S°uthwesteln~ .
(1) City of CoppeLL F. Kirf~Cook, P.P..
Our letters and reports ,are f.or the .exclusive use of_the client .to whom they are ad.dressed an.d shall not I~e r_epro, duced exqept In
1007 JM full without the apDrovau of me test~n~j lal3orat_ory, ine use Or ou~ name must receive our wrr~en aDprovel, uur ~etters eno reports
apply only to the sample tested and/Or insDecte~l., and are not indicative of the Cluar~ties of apparerg;y identical or similar prooucts.
2575 Lone Star Drive · P.O. Box 224227 · Dallas. Texas 75222
(214) 631-2700 / FAX (214) 920-1891
REPORT OF
IN-PLACE DENSITY
CUENT: RBR, Inc.
Attn: Bobby Rollings
P.O. Box 796303
Dallas, TX 75379-6303 CLIENT NO.: 3452351
REPORT NO.: 11304
PROJECT: River Ridge Addition DATE OF SERVICE: 6/01/94
Coppell, Texas AOTHORIZATION:
REPORT DATE: 6/02/94
SERVICES: Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine the degree
of field compaction.
PROJECT DATA MOISTURE/DENSITY RELATIONS
CONTRACTOR: Pacco OPTIMUM MAXIMUM
MATERIALS MOISTURE % DENSITY Dcf
TEST OF: Fill Material 98102-See remarks 18.5 108.5
98103-Tannish brown clay 22.0 99.0
94052- See remarks 20.5 103.0
METHOD OF TEST:
DENSITY: ASTM D 2922 SPECIFICATION
MOISTURE: AS~M D 3017 DENSITY: 95% MIN. DENSITY MOISTURE: _+2% OPTIt~L~
REPORT OF TESTS
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCATION (%) (%) (Pcfl (Pcfl (% max}
1. Lot D/il, 1st lift 20 5 18.5 104.5 108.5 96
2. Retest, lot D/9, subgrade 20 0 18.5 105.0 108.5 97
3. Lot D/lO, subgrade 20 5 18.5 103.8 108.5 96
4. Lot D/I, 1st lift 20 2 18.5 103.5 108.5 95
5. Lot D/2, subgrade 20 5 18.5 104.5 108.5 96
6. Retest, lot D/3, 1st lift 20 8 * 18.5 104.5 108.5 96
7. Lot D/3, subgrade 20.6 * 18.5 104.5 108.5 96
Report Of Tests Continued On Page 2
Our letters and reports are for the exc us ve use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except In
1007 JM full without the alN~ova of the testnQ laboratory. The use of our name must receive our written approval. Our letters and rel3orts
a13131y only to the sample tested and/Or Insl3ecte~l, and are not indicative of the quantities of al313arently identical or similar 13rocructs.
P, BR, Inc. REPORT NO. 11304
CLIENT NO. 3452351 PAGE 2
DATE OF SERVICE: 6/01/94
REPORT OF TESTS ¢c~=~nued~
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCATION (%) ~%) (PR (PR I% mw)
8. Lot D/4, subgrade 20.0 18.5 103.6 108.5 95
9. Lot D/5, subgrade 24.5 * 22.0 96.5 99.0 97
10. Lot D/7, subgrade 24.5 * 22.0 100.4 99.0 101
11. Lot D/8, subgrade 18.5 18.5 109.6 108.5 101
12. Lot C/10, 1st lift 30.0 * 20.5 90.0 103.0 87 *
13. Lot C/9, 1st lift 32.7 * 20.5 87.1 103.0 85 *
14. Lot C/8, 1st lift 30.1 * 20.5 89.8 103.0 87 *
15. Lot C/7, 1st lift 30.5 * 20.5 89.7 103.0 87 *
16. Lot C/2, 1st lift 26.3 * 22.0 96.4 99.0 97
17. Lot C/2, 2nd lift 24.0 22.0 98.3 99.0 99
18. Lot A/I, subgrade 19.0 18.5 106.6 108.5 98
19. Lot A/I, 1st lift 16.8 18.5 104.9 108.5 97
20 Lot A/2, 1st lift 18.6 18.5 107.6 108.5 99
21 Lot A/2, 2nd lift 17.2 18.5 106.5 108.5 98
22 Lot A/3, 2nd lift 19.5 18.5 106.7 108.5 98
23 Retest, lot A/3, 1st lift 19.5 18.5 103.7 108.5 96
24 Lot A/4, 1st lift 17.9 18.5 107.6 108.5 99
25 Retest, lot A/4, subgrade 20.7 * 18.5 107.9 108.5 99
26 Lot A/5, 1st lift 18.2 18.5 108.5 108.5 100
27 Retest, lot A/5, subgrade 17.8 18.5 108.4 108.5 100
28. Lot A/6, 1st lift 17.8 18.5 109.4 108.5 101
29. Retest, lot A/6, subgrade 17.5 18.5 108.4 108.5 100
Report Of Tests Continued On Page 3
Our letters and reports are for me exclu~ve use of the client.to vv~om they a. re ad.dressed a_n.~ s_h~_i_n_?__b,e r~ep..ro,_du~c~.e.d ..e_x?rPtee~rts
1007 JM fu without the approval of the testing laboratory.. The use OT pu.r. nq..me
apply only to the sample tested and/or Inspectea, aha are not inmcaave oT
REPORT NO. 11304
RBR, Inc. PAGE 3
CLIENT NO. 3452351
DATE OF SERVICE: 6/01/94
REPORT OF TESTS
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
TEST {%)
NO LOCA~ON
30. Retest, loc A/7, sub§rade 17.5 18.5 110.9 108.5 102
31. Retest, lot A/8, subgrade 20.5 18.5 108.9 108.5 100
32. Lot A/9, 1st lift 25.9 * 22.0 97.5 99.0 98
33. Lot A/10, 1st lift 26.0 * 22.0 95.3 99.0 96
34. Lot A/il, 1st lift 23.8 22.0 99.6 99.0 101
35. Lot A/12, 1st lift 17.4 18.5 110.2 108.5 102
36. Lot A/16, sub§fade 18.1 18.5 109.8 108.5 101
37. Loc A/16, 1st lift 16.3 * 18.5 107.5 108.5 99
38. Lot A/17, 1st lift 21.2 22.0 99.0 99.0 100
39. Lot A/18, 1st lift 18.4 18.5 107.2 108.5 99
40. Lot B/ii, 1st lift 8.5 * 18.5 108.5 108.5 100
41. Lot B/II, subgrade 18.1 18.5 109.3 108.5 101
42. Retest, B/8, subgrade 18.5 18.5 109.4 108.5 101
43. Lot B/4, 1st lift 20.4 20.5 102.1 103.0 99
44. Lot B/3, 1st lift 22.3 20.5 103.1 103.0 100
45. LOt 5/22, 1st lift 20.5 18.5 105.4 108.5 97
46. Retest, lot B/22, subgrade 21.3 * 18.5 104.2 108.5 96
47. Lot B/17, 1st lift 18.0 18.5 104.8 108.5 97
48. Lot B/18, 1st lift 18.3 18.5 105.5 108.5 97
49. Lot B/18, subgrade 19.0 18.5 106.2 108.5 98
50. Lot B/19, 1st lift 17.2 18.5 107.4 108.5 99
51. Retest, lot B/19, subgrade 18.2 18.5 108.4 108.5 100
Report Of Tests Continued On Page 4
· are addressed and st~all not be reproduced except in
exclusive use.of the client to whom th y n rovsl O~r letters and re orts
Our letters and reports are for ~e . The use of our name must recel .~...our_~t~t___e_~..aP~l~v~ d-~i-~.l or similar products
1007 JM full wtt~o, ut.~e approve.l, qf _~._e~te_s_a~n,~. ,l~.~o.r~at.~o.ry~ .nd are not indicative of t~le quammes oT uww~- ..... · ........ '
SWLr
RBR, Inc. REPORT NO. 11304
CLIENT NO. 3452351 PAGE 4
DATE OF SERVICE: 6/01/94
REPORT OF TESTS cco~t:i~e~)
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCATION (%) (%) (Pcfl (Pcfl (% max)
52. Lot B/20, 1st lift 19.4 18.5 106.3 108.5 98
53. Lot B/21, 1st lift 18.1 18.5 108.0 108.5 100
An asterisk (*) appears next to test results which
do NOT meet the project specifications as noted on page 1.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
98102-Brown shaley clay with gravel.
94052-Dark brown shaley clay with limestone.
Technician: Thomas Belew Started: 9:00AM Stopped: 5:00PM
CME Technician
Report Distribution: ~~__~~
Southwestern Laboratori , I .
(1) RBR, Inc.
(1) cad Engineering
(1) Pat:co Utilities, Inc.
(1) Cit:y Of topic)eLL F. King ook, P.E,
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not De reproduced except In
1007 JM full without the approval of the testing laboratory The use of our name must receive our written approval. Our letters and reports
apply only to the sample tested and/6r inspecte~l, anti are not indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.