River Ridge Add-LR 940413 2575 Lone Star Drive · P.O. Box 224227 · Dallas, Texas 75222
(214) 631-2700 / FAX (214) 920-1891
REPORT OF
IN-PLACE DENSITY
CMENT: RBR, Inc.
Attn: Bobby Rollings
P.O. Box 796303
Dallas, TX 75379-6303 CLIENT NO.: 3452351
REPORT NO.: 98520
PROJECT: River Ridge Addition DATE OF SERVICE: 4/11/94
Coppell, Texas AUTHORIZATION:
REPORT DATE: 4/13/94
SERVICES: Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine the degree
of field compaction.
PROJECT DATA MOISTURE/DENSITY RELATIONS
CONTRACTOR: Patco OFTIMUM MAXIMUM
MATERIALS MOISTURE % DENSITY Dcf
TEST OF: Subgrade/Streets & 98179-Med. brown clay, L/T 23.5 97.5
Alley's 98180-Light brown clay, L/T 21.5 101.5
98233-See remarks 18.0 107.5
METHOD OF TEST:
DENSITY: ASTM D 2922 SPECIFICATION
MOISTURE: ASTM D 3017 DENSITY: 95Z MIN. DENSITY MOISTURE: -1/+4~ OPTIMUM
REPORT OF TESTS
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCATION (~ (%) (Pcfl (Pc~ (% m~)
1. Retest of No. 6 from 4-7-94,
subgrade 20.9 * 23.5 96.5 97.5 99.0
2. Retest of No. 7 from 4-7-94,
subgrade 20.0 * 21.5 97.5 101.5 96.1
3. Retest of No. 8 from 4-7-94,
subgrade 14.2 * '18.0 100.4 107.5 93.4 *
4. Bradford, station 10+40,
subgrade 15.0 * 18.0 103.3 107.5 96.1
Report Of Tests Continued On Page 2
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except In
1007 JM full without the approval of the testing I~boratory. The use of our name must receive our wrEten apDrova Cyr letters and report, s
apply only to the sample tested aha/or respected, and are not indicative of the qusntitie$ of spp&ren[ty identical or ~imilar i~oouczs.
SWLr
[~,R, Inc. REPORT NO. 98520
CMENTNO. 3452351 PAGE 2
DATE OFSERVICE: 4/11/94
REPORT OF TESTS (c~t~r~)
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCATION (%) (%) CP~ (P~ (% max)
5. Bradford, station 6+50,
subgrade 15.7 * 18.0 101.1 107.5 94.0 *
6. Bradford, station 2+50,
subgrade 15.6 * 18.0 104.2 107.5 96.9
7. Retest of No. 3 from 4-7-94,
subgrade 15.9 * 18.0 104.8 107.5 97.5
8. Retest of No. 2 from 4-7-94,
subgrade 16.1 * 18.0 102.1 107.5 95.0
9. Retest of No. 4 from 4-7-94,
subgrade 18.4 * 21.5 97.7 101.5 96.3
An asterisk (*) appears next to test results which
do NOT meet the project specifications as noted on page 1.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
98233-Tannish brown clay with gravel, lime treated.
Technician: Charles Shurtleff Started: 8: 30AM Stopped: 12:30PM
Report Distribution: Southwestern La~, Inc
(1) RBR, ]nc.
(1) (;tM Engineering
(1) Parco Utilities, inc.
(1) City of CoppeL[ F. Kin~ Cook, P.E.
Our letters and reports ,are for the excl,uslve use ofthe client .to whom they are addressed and shall not be re~oduced exce~ In
1(3(37 JM full without the approva; of the testing ;~boratory. ~ne use or .ou[ name must receive our written a~[3roval. Our letters and reports
apply only to the sample teste~l anti/Or mspecteH, and are not educative of the ;3,.~antities of al~p~rerruy Identical or similar products.
2575 Lone S~r D~ve · P.O. Box 224227 · Dai~m, Texas 75222
(214) 631-2700 / FAX (214) B20-1891
REPORT OF
IN-PLACE DENSITY
CUENT: RBR, Inc.
Attn: 5obby Rollings
P.O. Box 796303
Dallas, TX 75379-6303 CLIENT NO.: 3452351
REPORT NO.: 98587
PROJEC'F: River Ridge Addition DATE OF SERVICE: 4/11/94
Coppell, Texas AUTHORIZATION:
REPORT DATE: 4/13/94
SERVICES: Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine the degree
of field compaction.
PROJECT DATA MOISTURE/DENSITY RELATIONS
CONTRACTOR: Parco OPTIMUM MAXIMUM
MATERIALS MOISTURE % DENSITY Dcf
TEST OF: House Pads Subgrade 96605-Dark brown silty clay 20.0 101.5
94906-Brownish tan & gray clay 16.5 111.5
with some shale
METHOD OF TEST:
DENSITY: ASTM D 2922 SPECIFICATION
MOISTURE: ASTM D 3017 DENSITY: 95~ MIN. DENSII~ MOISTURE:-1-2~ OPTIM3J~
REPORT OF TESTS
FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD MAXIMUM
TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY DENSITY
NO LOCATION ~) ~%) ~P~ ~P~ ~ m~)
1. Lot #11, block D 19.0 20.0 100.3 101.5 99
2. Lot #1, block D 16.4 16.5 107.6 111.5 97
3. Lot #9, block D 14.0 * 16.5 103.4 111.5 93 *
4. Lot #4, block C 22.0 20.0 97.6 101.5 96
5. LOt #5, block C 23.7 * 20~0 92.7 101.5 91 *
6. Lot #6, block C 24.2 * 20.0 95.2 101.5 94 *
An asterisk (*) appears next to test results which
do NOT meet the project specifications as noted above.
Report Of Tests Continued On Page 2
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and sba not be reproduced except n
1OO7 JlVi full w~thout the approval of the testing laboratory. The use of our name must receive our written approval Oyr let~er~, and reporls
apply only to the sample tested anti/or inspectei:l, and are not indicative of the QuantKies of apparently Identical or similar products.
SWZr
RBR, Inc. REPORT NO. 98587
CLIENT NO. 3452351 PAGE 2
DATE OF SERVICE: 4/11/94
REPORT OF TESTS (c~tir.~e~)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Technician time: See report 98520
Technician: Charles Shurtleff
Report Distribution:
(1) RBR, inc. Southwestern Laboratories,
(1) CCN Engineering
(1) Parco Utilities, Inc.
(1) City of Coppe[[
F. King ook' P.E.
.Oq..r Iq~ers and reports are. for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in
1007 JM ~u, Without the approval ol the testing laboratory The use of our name must race ye our wr~ten approval. O~r letters and reports
apply only to the 5ample tested and/or inspecteU, and are not Ind*catwe of the quantJties of apparently Identical o~ similar products.