Riverview Estates-LR 970716ALPHA TESTING, INC.
2209 wisconsin St., Suite 100
Dallas, Texas 75229
(972) 620-8911
DAILY FIELD REPORT
TESTED FOR
HUFFINES & PARTNERS
C/O CCM ENGINEERING
DATE
07/16/97
PROJECT
RIVERVlEW ESTATES
COPPELL, TEXAS
OUR REPORT NO.
97224-20
WEATHER: CLOUDY
TEMPERATURE RANGE:
ALPHA Representative:
75
J.B.
TO:
95
THE ALPHA TECHNICIAN TRAVELED TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED pROJECT AS REQUESTED
TO MONITOR ON-GOING WORK AND PERFORM FIELD TESTING AS REQUESTED.
SUBGPJ~DE FOR PADS 14 THROUGH 21, BLOCK B WAS OBSERVED TO VERIFY THAT AREAS
HAD BEEN PREPARED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS.
A TOTAL OF 14 FIELD DENSITY TESTS WERE PERFORMED ON FILL AND NATUBAL
SUBGPJkDE FOR PAD FILL ARF_~%. SEE ATTACHED REPORT FOR RESULTS OF FIELD
COMPACTION TESTING.
THE SINACOLA REPRESENTATIVE WAS INFORMED OF ALL OBSERVATIONS AND FIELD
TEST RESULTS.
AT THE COMPLETION OF THE SCHEDULED TESTING THE TECHNICIAN RETURNED TO THE
DALLAS OFFICE.
CG01083-29
ALPHA TESTING, INC.
2209 Wisconsin St., Suite 100
Dallas, Texas 75229
(9?2) 620-8911
REPORT OF FIELD
COMPACTION TESTS
TESTEDFOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 07/16/97
C/O CCM ENGINEERING
PROJECT RIVERVIEW ESTATES OUR REPORT NO.
COPPELL, TEXAS
97224-20A
TEST DATA:
TEST I I~ ELEV. SOIL ID OPT,MUM MAXIMUM LAS IN PLACE IN PLACE PERCENT
~J MOISTURE DRY DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY COMMENT*
~NO. DATE DE NUMBER % PCF % PCF COMPACTION
97 07/16 SG 3 22.2 93.8 24.3 92 98 2-A
98 07/16 SG 3 22.2 93,8 23.7 92 98 2-A
99 07/16 SG 3 22.2 93.8 24.4 90 96 2-A
lOO 07/16 SG 3 22,2 93.8 23.0, 93 99 2-A
lol 07/16 SG 3 22.2 93.8 24.7 92 98 2-A
102 07/16 SG 3 22.2 93.8 23.9 91 97 2-A
103 07/16 FG-1.2 2 20.5 99.5 21.5 94 95 1-A
TEST LOCATION:
93 BLOCK B, PAD 11
98 BLOCK B, PAD 13
99 BLOCK B, PAD 15
100 BLOCK B, PAD 17
101 BLOCK B, PAD 19
102 BLOCK A, PAD 21
103 BLOCK A, PAD 2
1. FILL
2. NATURAL SUBGRADE
3. LIME STABILIZED
4. CEMENT TREATED
CG01083-18
IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS
* A.
B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS / Respectfully Submi~d
C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS
D. RETEST
ALPHA TESTING, INC.
2209 wisconsin St., Suite 100
Dallas, Texas 75229
(972) 620-8911
REPORT OF FIELD
COMPACTION TESTS
TESTEDFOR HUFFINES & PARTNERS DATE 07/16/97
C/O CCM ENGINEERING
PROJECT
RIVERVIEW ESTATES
COPPELL, TEXAS
OUR REPORT NO,
97224-20B
TEST DATA:
TEST DATE ~ SOIL ID OPTIMUM MAXIMUM LAB IN PLACE IN PLACE PERCENT
MOISTURE DRY DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY COMPACTION COMMENT*
NO. NUMBER % PCF % PCF
104 07/16 FG-i.7 2 20.5 99.5 21.6 95 95 1-A
105 07/16 FG-2.0 2 20.5 99.5 21.0 95 96 1-A
106 07/16 FG-3.2 2 20.5 99.5 20.8 95 96 1-'A
107 07/16 FG-3.1 2 20.5 99.5 22.0 95 95 1-A
108 07/16 FG-4.0 2 20.5 99.5 20.9 98 98 1-A
109 07/16 FG-2.5 2 20.5 99.5 21.4 96 96 1-A
110 07/16 FG-3.0 2 20.5 99.5 21.6 95 96 1-A
TEST LOCATION:
104 BLOCK A, PA/) 4
105 BLOCK A, PAD 6
106 BLOCK A, PAD 8
107 BLOCK A, PAD 10
108 -BLOCK A, PAD 12
109 BLOCK A, PAD 14
110 BLOCK A, PAD 16
1, FILL
2, NATURAL SUBGRADE
3. LIME STABILIZED
4. CEMENT TREATED
CG01083-18
* A. IN PLACE PERCENT MOISTURE AND PERCENT COMPACTION COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS~ B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS
C. PERCENT IN PLACE MOISTURE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS
D.
RETEST