Loading...
ST9602-CS000801From: Jack Loggins <Jack. Loggins@DLSCMAQ.com> To: "Scott Young (E-mail)" <syoung@usaengineers.com> Date: Tue, Aug 1, 2000 4:51 PM Subject: P10 Final Comments Attached please find letter and consolidated comments. All comments need to have an action of "A", "D", or "N/A" to proceed to the next submittal. If "D", provide the persons name deleting the comment and the date. If "N/A", provide a complete explanation. If "C" or "E", call and let's discuss before submitting. Names of the commenting person and phone number are provided for you to work out any item. If needed bring the CMAQ office into the discussion. <<038 P10 Final Review.doc>> <<P10 Revised Consolidated Final Review.doc>> Jack W. Loggins, Deputy Program Manager - CMAQ Office Parsons Brinckerhoff, 1701 N. Market Street Dallas, Texas, 75201, (214) 747-6336 x 28 FAX (214) 741-1937 CC: Ivan Nicodemus <lvan.Nicodemus@DLSCMAQ.com>, "Fray... August 1, 2000 Mr. Scott Young, P.E. USA 8700 Stemmons Freeway, Suite 400 Dallas, TX 75247 Subject: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program Consolidated Final ('100%) Review Comments - Project 10 Dear Mr. Young: The PM/E has received and consolidated all comments from TxDOT, City of Coppell, and this office pertaining to Project 10. A copy of this letter will be faxed to you and an electronic copy of the comments will be E-mailed to you today. Enter your responses on the electronic copy and return a hard and electronic copy to this office no later than August 14, 2000. If you feel that some review comments need further discussion, notify this office immediately upon receipt. As a result of numerous mistakes, paper copies of the plan sheets must be submitted for verification before printing and sealing the mylars. The verification plan set can be submitted after approval of the dispositioned comments. If you have any questions, please contact me at 214-747-6336 ext. 26. Questions or further clarification of the review comments can be directed to Jack Loggins at ext. 28. Sincerely, Ivan F. Nicodemus, P.E. Program Manager Attachment: (1 .) Consolidated Final Comments (2.) Mark-ups of Plans (3.) Photos With Comments (9 each) cc: Don Cranford, P.E., Asst. Director, Trans. and Planning, w/o attachments Moosa Saghian, P.E., TxDOT Special Project Office, w/o attachments Kenneth Griffin, P.E., City of Coppell, w/attachments Fraydon Na~ssi, P.E., Texas Department of Transportation, w/attachments Jahor Roy, P.E., Texas Department of Transportation, w/attachments H:\P14CORR\P14-1OU~P10-Usa~2000\038_P10 Final Reviewodoc DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 10 Submittal: Final Review Date: July 19, 2000 Reviewer: Various Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: ( Item I Page No. Comment - (state fully action required, i.e., clarify, change, Response No. Sheet No. add, delete, etc. 1. Cover Change the various listing of BC-Standards to "latest edition" to avoid having to make future changes in the plan set. This is for when the BC-standards are referenced in a note, such as on the cover sheet. On the index the correct sheet should be listed. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Cover Quantity Summary sheet must follow the general notes Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Cover/ Move MacArthur above Denton Tap on the cover sheet PME Note: TxDOT desired Index and change the order of the design drawings, or make the design drawings be c summary sheet match the cover sheet, index, and MacArthur first. This di design drawings. modified to making th Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 intersections consistent package. 1. Index IL-H(M) Horizontal Inlet Ty H must be added to the index of sheets. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Index All BC standards must be updated. Please check all standards for current editions Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Index TCP (1-4) is appropriate for this project. The remainder shown does not pertain to the specifics of this project. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Index Why was IL-H(M) included in this plan set to the exclusion of other TxDOT standards. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Index SMD standards must be updated Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Index WZ(BTS) should be deleted, the work zone standards WZ(CD) and WZ(TD) are required to properly close lanes. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Quantity Current Prep ROW - Needs to show both Summar intersections. y Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Quantity Remove small structures, item 496 is required. Summar Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 Y v Action Codes Dispositioned B A - Agree, Designer will comply D - Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Title: C - Disagree, Designer and E - Exception, Resolution Required Date: Reviewer Resolution Required N/A- Not Applicable H:\P11 Final100\P11-2Review\P10\Consolidated\P10 Revise DESIGN REVIEW COMMENT DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 10 Submittal: Final Review Date: July 19, 2000 Reviewer: Various Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: ( Item I Page No. Comment - (state fully action required, i.e., clarify, change,Response No. Sheet No. add, delete, etc. 1. Quantity Add item 400, excavation. This is required to Summar complement item 464 CL III pipe. y Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Quantity 32 square meters of brick pavers are shown on Summar summary however on paving plans less than that y seems to be called out. Please verify. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Quantity Coppell must provide escrow for pavers. Summar Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 Y 1. Quantity Removal and Salvage of brick pavers should be a Summar removal only, it is not cost effective to remove, store, y and reinstall. Just call out as removal, and then call out new pavers. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Quantity Item 678 Remove Concrete (Curb and Gutter) is Summar subsidiary to remove concrete pavement. Verify that y quantity is correct, remove concrete curb and gutter is a linear item and is only applicable when only the curb and gutter is sawed off and removed. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Quantity Item 666 - Type II is used as a sealer but Type I is Summar always paired as it is placed on top of the sealer (Type y II). Add under same item number. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Quantity Silt fence and hay bales must be added. Must have 2 Summar things, installation and removal. y Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. TCP's Lane Closures - One lane closure 9AM to 4PM is OK. Do Not allow the contractor to close more than one lane. Resolve with Ken Griffin, Coppell (972) 304-3679 1. Title Move McArthur at Beltline above the Denton Tap Sheet intersection, it is the more complex project. Make the same changes to the summary sheet. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 v Action Codes Dispositioned B A - Agree, Designer will comply D - Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Title: C - Disagree, Designer and E - Exception, Resolution Required Date: Reviewer Resolution Required N/A - Not Applicable H :\P11 Final100\P11-2Review\P10\Consolidated\P10 Revise DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 10 Submittal: Final Review Date: July 19, 2000 Reviewer: Various Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: ( Item I Page No. Comment - (state fully action required, i.e., clarify, change, Response No. Sheet No. add, delete, etc. 1. Title Change the comment on the BC standards to the Sheet "latest edition", that way when the standards change there is no need to make changes to an individual listing of the sheets. This is a typical comment for the entire plan set, save the actual index sheet. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. Traffic The pole standards in the plans are wrong. The City Pole has a special designed pole in which we have provided Standar exact details on before. In addition, the color is brown. ds Check spec's for exact color. Change pole design and specifications to match City design. Resolve with Ken Griffin, Coppell (972) 304-3679 1. 1 In letting Signature block, change "19" to 20. Resolve with Jahor Roy, TxDOT 214-319-6405 1. 1, Please use latest BC standard sheets. 2 Resolve with Jahor Roy, TxDOT 214-319-6405 1. 2 Please delete sheet #60. Resolve with Jahor Roy, TxDOT 214-319-6405 1. 2 Need to add RAMP-00A under the list of State Standard Sheet. Resolve with Jahor Roy, TxDOT 214-319-6405 1. 2 Sheet #60 SMA-130(1) - 96(M) should be SMA-130('I) - 99(M). Resolve with Jahor Roy, TxDOT 214-319-6405 1. 2 Sheet # 50 to 58 should be under State Standard Sheets. It is showing DESCRIPTION (PLAN SHEETS). Resolve with Jahor Roy, TxDOT 214-319-6405 1. 3 Cost breakdown for Item #680 is missing. Resolve with Jahor Roy, TxDOT 214-319-6405 1. 8 Reflecting Sheeting for all signs listed in this sheet should be "A". Resolve with Jahor Roy, TxDOT 214-319-6405 1. 9 Insufficient difference between existing and proposed legends. See signal conduit and pedestrian ramps for example. Resolve with Fray/don Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 v Action Codes Dispositioned B A - Agree, Designer will comply D - Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Title: C - Disagree, Designer and E - Exception, Resolution Required Date: Reviewer Resolution Required N/A - Not Applicable H:\P 11 Final 100\P 11-2Review\P10\Consolidated\P10 Revise DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 10 Submittal: Final Review Date: July 19, 2000 Reviewer: Various Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: ( Item J Page No. Comment - (state fully action required, i.e., clarify, change,Response No. Sheet No. add, delete, etc. 1. 10 A. Why is % specified? Show match existing condition. No lime shown for base under pavement. Scale is wrong - Should be 1:100. Remember deliverable is 11 x 17's A 0.6 m saw cut cannot support the dimensions shown on TCP Plan for the placement of chanellizing devices. AC base material should extend behind back of curb by at least 0.3 m. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. 11 A. TCP plan must be adjusted based upon a 0.15 m distance for saw cut from face of curb. Note 1 will not work with TCP as shown. Lane widths must be revised to accommodate three lanes. You must have at least one line of lane markings to support an offset and 3.0/3.0/.25/.2 lane configuration. This will require adding pavement markings to summary and pavement marking sheets for both work zone (WZ) markings and pavement markings. Remove existing WZ Add TCP Notes, See Attachment Delete notes 1 & 2. Notes should be connected to TCP. A. Delete note 3. Do Not let contractor close two lanes. Sign 2 Not Required. Sign 4 repetitive of Sign 2 Signs 5 & 6 are only used with lane closure. No longer needed. Note must be added so that it is known plan shown is for off-peak. Sign 7 should be C20-2A "End Road Work" and placed at end of work area. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. 12 A. See previous notes Typical Section must be revised. Only sign 4 is necessary on approach to intersection when there is no construction. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 v Action Codes Dispositioned B A - Agree, Designer will comply D - Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Title: C - Disagree, Designer and E - Exception, Resolution Required Date: Reviewer Resolution Required N/A - Not Applicable H:\P11 Final 100\P11-2Review\P10\Consolidated\P10 Revise DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 10 Submittal: Final Review Date: July 19, 2000 Reviewer: Various Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: ( Item ~ Page No. I Comment - (state fully action required, i.e., clarify, change, Response No. Sheet No. add, delete, etc. 1. 13 A. Modify saw-cut line. A. Corner should be clipped to aid in traffic flow during construction and to lower construction cost. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. 14 A. Should make mention of removals. Correct saw cut to 0.15 m from 0.6 m. Layout information must be on paving Sheet. Leave base dimensions for information. Must show removal of inlet at Sta 9 + 965. Inlet cannot be capped. Add clip of pavement as shown on "Intersection Layout". Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. 15 Notes mentioned Pole P-3. Plan shows Pole P-3 is existing. Pole P-2 is new. Also, notes 2, 3 & 4 mentioned Pole P-3. Make changes on plan sheet or notes. Resolve with Jahor Roy, TxDOT 214-319-6405 1. 15 Roadway elements (conduit run, ramps) are outside the ROW. Resolve with Jahor Roy, TxDOT 214-319-6405 1. 16 In conduit run chart, in run # 9 & 10 need 1-#6 bare. Therefore, the total of #6 bare should be 25.7 M. Resolve with Jahor Roy, TxDOT 214-319-6405 1. 17 A. The two lines for the crosswalk imply paint strip where brick is used for crosswalk. Install of Pavement Markings is called out on sheet but no summary of intersection is given. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 v Action Codes Dispositioned B A - Agree, Designer will comply D - Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Title: C - Disagree, Designer and E - Exception, Resolution Required Date: Reviewer Resolution Required N/A - Not Applicable H:\P11 Final100\P11-2Review\P10\Consolidated\P10 Revise DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM Project:: CMAQ Project 10 Submittal: Final Review Date: July 19, 2000 Reviewer: Various Consolidated Organization: PM/E Reviewer Telephone Number: ( Item I Page No. Comment - (state fully action required, i.e., clarify, change, Response No. Sheet No. add, delete, etc. 1. 18 A. Section is at Station 9 + 930. Retaining wall is shown on plan but not in section. There is no reason for a retainer wall in this location. Median can be graded to meet requirements. Trees that are removed should be salvaged and replaced in median. Where did 2% slope come from for median? Median is an existing berm and is example to remain as such. Correct Scale. Station must be related to section cut. Dimensions are wrong. Dimensions shown for "existing" is really "proposed" and dimensioned between improper limits. Direct to "Match existing slope" rather than call out a number No lime shown for base. Extend base beyond back of curb 0.3 m. Sawcut is shown with no information. Is 'Width varies" necessary? It has no meaning and should be deleted. Curbs to be removed should be subdued, is wrong leave out. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. 19 Same Comments as Previous TCP's. & 20 Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. 19 Section B-B should be revised per previous comments. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. 20 Section A-A should be revised per previous comments Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. 21 Eliminate retaining wall. Resolve with Fraydon Nafissi, TxDOT (214) 320-4434 1. 23 It is not justified to spend 20% of the improvement cost Retainer for this retainer wall. Remove the wall from the plans Wall and provide a berm in it's place. Place sod or hydromulch on the berm. Resolve with Ken Griffin, Coppell (972) 304-3679 1. 25 Loops are not in scale. Resolve with Jahor Roy, TxDOT 214-319-6405 1. 26 In conduit run chart, in run # 4 & 5 need 1-#6 bare. Therefore, the total of #6 bare should be 14.0 M. Resolve with J a hor Roy, TxDOT 214-319-6405 v Action Codes Dispositioned B A - Agree, Designer will comply D - Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment Title: C - Disagree, Designer and E - Exception, Resolution Required Date: Reviewer Resolution Required N/A - Not Applicable H:\P11 Final100\P11-2Review\P10\Consolidated\P10 Revise