Shadydale Lots 2-5-CS 990121 CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE: SHADYDALE ACRES, REPLAT OF TRACTS 2,
3, 4 AND $, BLOCK B
P & Z HEARING DATE: January 21, 1999
C.C. HEARING DATE: February 9, 1999
·
LOCATION: Along the south side of Willow Lane; between Oak Trail and
Shadydale Lane.
SIZE OF AREA: 4.15 acres, for the development of 13 residential lots.
CURRENT ZONING: PD-SF-12 (Planned Development, Single Family-12)
REQUEST: Replat approval.
APPLICANT: Developer: Engineer:
The Holmes Builders, Inc. Dowdey, Anderson & Assoc., Inc.
1406 Halsey Way 5225 Village Creek Dr, Ste 200
Carrollton, TX 75007 Piano, TX 75093
(972) 242-1770 (972) 931-0694
Fax: (972) 242-2931 Fax: (972) 931-9538
HISTORY: The property has been zoned SF-12 for over 25 years. The
Shadydale Acres Subdivision has been recorded for 50 years or
more. On September 17, 1998, the Planning Commission denied a
PD for 14 single-family lots on this parcel. In November the
Planning Commission considered a 13 lot subdivision which was
accepted and subsequently approved by Council in December.
Item# 9
TRANSPORTATION: Shadydale Lane and Oak Trail are 2-lane asphalt residential streets
without curb and gutter, each within a 60'-wide right-of-way.
Willow Lane is a similar street, but within a 30'-wide right-of-way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North- Coppell High School; C
South -Single-family residential; SF-12
East - Single-family residential; SF-12
West - Single-family residential; SF-12 ~
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable for
low-density residential use.
DISCUSSION: This repht follows on the heels of a zoning change, which was approved
by City Council in December. The replat shows the same 13 lots which
were approved earlier by both Commission and Council, and contains the
same notes which outline how this development will proceed, i.e., no
alleys, locations of fences, set-backs, etc.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff recommends approval of the replat document, the applicant has met
all City requirements.
ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the replat
2) Recommend disapproval of the replat
3) Recommend modification of the replat
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Replat document
2) Tree Survey
Item # 9