Loading...
Town Center L1B2-LR 980417GEOiECHNICAL ENGINEERING I Consultants, Inc. lEI 10046 Monroe Drive · Dallas, Texas 75229 ° (214) 352-5433 · Fax (214) 352-6972 REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL Density Report No. 5 (298-0165) Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Page of 1 Client: Ewing Properties Material Deacription Maxi~iaal~ Optimum " Dry Moisture Density Content Project: Town Center Shopping-Coppell (I. bs/CuF0 Percent 1. Olive Gray Clay 103.2 17.6 2. Reddish Brown Sandy Clay 99.6 18.4 Test Date: April 15, 1998 (2:00 pm) 3. Brown & Yellowish Brown Silty Clay 98.2 17.8 4. Yellowish Brown Clayey Sand (select fill) 115.0 11.5 Report Date: April 17, 1998 Required Density (%): Min. 95% Required Moisture (%): Opt :t:3% Mat Location/Elevation (and/or) Lift In-Place In-Place Percent No. Dry Density Moistur~ Compaction Test (Lbs/CuFt) Content (%) No. Probe 3 First Lift - NW portion - Building Pad 11 140' E. & 22' N. of SW building pad comer 119.8 12.1 104.2 6" 3 Final Lift - NW portion - Building Pad 12 60' E. &18' N. of SW building pad corner 114.4 12.1 96.8 6" Tests meet project speciflcat/ons Mr. John Maggiore - Ewing Properties Mr. Hank Quigg - Richmond Group Mr. Steve Dial - Hum & Joiner Engineering Mr. Eric Royal - Royal General Contractors Mr. Larry Davis - City of Coppell (2) Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addre~ed. The u~e of our name mint receiv~ our prior wrium approval. Our lettera and repona apply only to the sample teated and/or inspected, and are not necessarily indicative of the quantifies of apparently identical or similar products. · GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING E , oGEE Consultants, Inc. 10046 Monroe Drive · Dallas, Texas 75229 · (214) 352-5433 · Fax (214) 352-6972 REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL Densir Report No. 4 (298-0165) Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Page 1 of 1 Client: Ewing Prol~rties Ma~'~l D~cription M~m O~m D~ Moisture ~i~ C~t Project: To~ Center Shopp~g-Cop~H (LbslCuFt) ~r~t 1. O~e Gray C~y 103.2 17.6 2. R~ Bm~ ~dy C~y ~.6 18.4 Test Dam: April 15, 1998 (~) ~. Bm~ & Y~h Bm~ S~ C~y 98.2 4. Ye~h Bm~ ~y~ ~d (~ ~ I1~.0 11.5 R~ Da~: Ap~l 17, 1998 Re~ed ~miW (%): Min. 95% Req~ed Mois~e (%): Opt ~3% M~ ~o~El~a~on (~o0 Li~ In-Pl~ IwP~ ~t No. D~ ~i~ Mo~mm Co~on T~t (L~/~Ft) Con~t (~) No. 3 Select Fill - F~I D~ - SE po~on 9 105' E. & 15' N. of SW ~fl~g pad corner 114.5 11.5 99.6 6" 3 Select F~I - F~I ~ - SE po~on 10 20' S. & 25' W. of ~ b~g pad corner 117.8 12.5 102.4 6" Tests meet project specifications CCl Mr. John Maggiore - Ewhag Properties Mr. Hank Quigg - Richmond Group Mr. Steve Dial - Hum & Joiner Engineering Mr. Eric Royal - Royal General Contractors Mr. Larry Davis - City of Copper (2) Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed. The use of our name must receive our prior written approvnl. Our le~a's and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or inspected, and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.  · GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 'j GEE Consultants, Inc. E 10046 Monroe Drive · Dallas, Texas 75229 · (214) 352-5433 · Fax (214) 352-6972 REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL Density Repor~ No. 3 (298-0165) Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Page of 1 Client: Ewing Properties M~eriai Oescripaon M~0mum Opmum Dry Mois-,re De~iry Content Project: Town Center Shopping-Coppell (U~s/CuFt) Perce~ 1. Olive Gray Clay I03~ 17.6 2. Reddish Brown Sandy Clay 99.6 18.4 Test Date: April 14, 1998 3. Brown & Yellowish Brown Silty Clay 98.2 17.8 4. Yellowish Brown Clayey Sand (select fill) 11S.0 11.S Repor~ Date: April 17, 1998 Required Density (%): Min. 95% Required Moisture (%): Opt +5% M~ Location/Elevation (and/or) Lift in-Piece In-Place Percent No. Dry Demity Moisture Compaction Test (Lbs/CuFt) Con~nt (%) No. 4 Subgradc - NW half 5 10' N. & 120' W. of SW building pad corner 96.9 22.3 97.7 6" 2 Subgrade - NW half 6 20' S. & 35' E. of NW building pad corner 101.6 17.6 102.0 6" 3 Select Fill - SW half- First Lift 7 25' S. & 100' W. of NE building pad corner 109.2 13.4 95.0 4" 3 Select Fill - SW half- First Lift 8 15' N. & 30' E. of SW building pad corner 118.2 12.5 102.9 6" Tests meet project specifications cc: Mr. John Maggiore - Ewing Properties Mr. Hanlr Quigg - Richmond Group Mr. Steve Dial - Hunt & Joiner Engineering Mr. Eric Royal - Royal General Contractors Mr. Larry Davis - City of Coppell (2) Our lel~ers and repons are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed. The use of otlr name must receive our prior written approval. Our lette~ and repons apply only to the sample tested and/or inspected, and are no~ necessarily indic, alive of the quamities of apparently identical or similar products. [· GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING E I GEE Consultants, Inc. 10046 Monroe Drive · Dallas, Texas 75229 · (214) 352-5433 o Fax (214) 352-6972 REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL Density Report No. 2 (298-0165) Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Page of 1 Client: Ewing Properties Mate~ Description Maximum Optimum Dry Moisture Density Content Project: Town Center Shopping-Coppell (Lbs/CuR) Percent 1. Olive Gray Clay 103.2 17.6 2. Reddish Brown Sandy Clay 99.6 18.4 Test Date: April 13, 1998 3. llrown & Yellowish Brown Silty Clay 98.2 17.8 4. Yellowish Brown Clayey Sand (se/eot fill) 115.0 ILS Report Date: April 17, 1998 Required Density (%): Min. Required Moisture (%): Opt +S% Mat Location/Elevation (and/or) Lift In-Place In-Place Percent No. Dry Density Moisture Compaction Test (L,bs/CuFt) Content (%) No. Probe 3 Retest of #1 3 94.1 20.7 95.8 6" 3 Retest of #2 4 98.2 17.8 100.0 6" Tests meet project specifications cc: Mr. John Maggiore - Ewing Properties Mr. Hank Quigg - Richmond Group Mr. Steve Dial - Hunt & Joiner Engineering Mr. Eric Royal - Royal General Contractors Mr. Larry Davis - City of Coppell (2) Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed. The use of our name faust receive our prior written approval Our letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or inspected, and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.