Loading...
Town Center West-CS 991216 CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE: TOWN CENTER WEST, LOTS l&2, BLOCK A PRELIMINARY PLAT P & Z HEARING DATE: December 16, 1999 C.C. HEARING DATE: January 11, 2000 LOCATION: Southwest corner of N. Denton Tap Road and Town Center West Boulevard. SIZE OF AREA: Approximately 4.5 acres of property, being platted into two lots. CURRENT ZONING: PD-C (Planned Development, Commercial) REQUEST: Preliminary Plat approval for one 1.8-acre lot (for retail use), and one 2.6-acre lot (for day care and child development use). APPLICANT: Prospective purchaser: Realtex Ventures Jim Mills 1825 Wimbleton Drive,//21000 Arlington, TX. 76017 (817) 784-9947 Fax: (817) 468-9521 HISTORY: This property has had no recent platting history although a street was delineated on the north side of this parcel and a Conceptual Planned Development was approved in May of 1999. TRANSPORTATION: Denton Tap Road is a P6D, six-lane divided thoroughfare contained within 110-120 feet of right of way. Proposed Town Center Blvd. West will be a 27-foot wide local street allowing access to the Coppell High School property. Item//6 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North- existing single-family development; PD-129, SF-9 South - vacant; "C', Commercial East- Comerica Bank; "TC" Town Center West - single family housing; SF-12 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows the property suitable for retail, commercial uses. DISCUSSION: The Detailed PD which accompanies this application needs a great deal of work before it is acceptable for review (see staff comments re: PD-178 R and 178 RR). Landscaping requiremems have not been followed, stacking/f'Lre lane issues are troublesome, and overall development concepts need further refinement. That being the case, we can not accurately evaluate this request as utility easements, fh-e lanes, building lines, etc. can not be accurately located on the plat documem until the use, building size, parking requiremems, landscape easements, etc. are known. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff recommends DENIAL of this application until the above listed issues have been addressed, and we have had an opportunity to review a plat that contains adequate and acceptable information meeting the City's minimum development standards. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the request 2) Recommend denial of the request ATTACHMENTS: 1) Preliminary Plat Document 2) Site Plan 3) Departmental Comments Item//6 DE VEL OPMENT RE VIE W COMMITTEE FIRE PREVENTION COMMENTS ITEM: TOWN CENTER WEST LOTS 1 & 2 BLK A DRC DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 1999 CONTACT: TRAVIS CRUMP, FIRE MARSHAL. (972) 304-3503 COMMENT S TA TUS: INITIAL PRELIMINARY FINAL 1. Additional fire hydrants will be required. 2. Locate hydrants between 3 - 6 feet from a fire lane. 3. Access gates required for Fire Department access to playgrounds. CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.: PD-178R, TOWN CENTER WEST DETAIL SITE PLAN OF A RETAIL CENTER P & Z HEARING DATE: December 16, 1999 C.C. HEARING DATE: January 11, 2000 LOCATION: Southwest corner of N. Denton Tap Road and Town Center West Boulevard. SIZE OF AREA: An approximate 1.8-acre site out of a 4.5-acre parcel. CURRENT ZONING: PD-C (Planned Development, Commercial) REQUEST: PD amendment to allow the construction of a 13,393 square foot retail facility. APPLICANT: Yorkshire West Capital, Inc., Tr. Alan Hinckley 12201 Merit Drive, Suite 170 Dallas, TX. 75251 (214) 991-4600 HISTORY: This property has had no recent development history, although a street was delineated and a conceptual PD was approved in the summer of 1999. TRANSPORTATION: Denton Tap Road is a P6D, six-lane divided thoroughfare contained within 110-120 feet of right of way. Proposed Town Center Blvd. West will be a 27-foot wide local street allowing access to the Coppell High School property. Item # 4 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North- existing single-family development; PD-129, SF-9 South - vacant; "C', Commercial East- Comerica Bank; "TC" Town Center West -single family housing; SF-12 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows the property suitable for retail, commercial uses. DISCUSSION: When the Conceptual Planned Development District was approved for this parcel, uses were discussed only superficially, hence, the reason for the detailed site plan review. Submitted for consideration is an approximate 13,500 square foot retail building which has very little information regarding specific uses. This lack of specificity is troublesome to staff in that we can not offer substantive advice on whether a specific user would or would not be allowed in the building. Absent that helpful information, the elevations give one the impression that the building meets our regulations, the monument sign is appropriately sized, and parking shown appears to comply with code. However, the landscape plan is deficient in parking islands, a 10 foot landscape buffer is required on the south property line, thirty foot high light fixtures are questionable here adjacent to a residential neighborhood, and staff requested landscape calculations have not been provided. In addition, driveway spacing along Town Center West Boulevard is much too numerous for safety's sake. In sum, PD's offer a certain amount of flexibility in the development process, and can address specific issues relative to individual situations. In this instance, however, the application appears to be totally speculative and from staff's perspective, our concerns with meeting minimum standards have not been met. With building size reduced, landscape requirements being addressed, issues regarding traffic safety being resolved, lowering the light standard height and a number of other minor bothersome concerns undertaken, staff could eventually support a similar request. At this point, though, these concerns have not been properly addressed and are inconsistent with ordinance requirements. This application needs work, and at the present time appears to be a bit too intensive in design. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff recommends DENIAL of this request based upon the comments presented above. Item # 4 ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the request 2) Recommend denial of the request 3) Modify the request 4) Take under advisement for additional information ATTACHMENTS: 1) Architectural Site Plan 2) Proposed Floor Plan Schematic 3) Elevations/Monument Sign 4) Tree Survey 5) Landscape Plan 6) Departmental Comments Item # 4